Dursun Karakaş
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Dursun Karakaş has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Bedirhan Sarı
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey
1 shared publication - Emine Çetin Duru
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Adana City Research and Training Hospital, Adana, Turkiye
1 shared publication - Fatih Yuvacı
Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, İstanbul University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye
1 shared publication - Hakan Uslu
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences, Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey
1 shared publication - Hayati Durmaz
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine Istanbul Turkey
1 shared publication - Oğuzhan Çiçek
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Adana City Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Adana 01230, Turkey
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 15 July 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Rheumatology International
- Vol. 46 (8)
Comparative effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and high-intensity laser therapy in trigger finger: a randomized controlled trial
Trigger finger (TF) is stenosing tenosynovitis causing pain and impaired hand function. To compare extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) as adjuncts to home exercise in TF. In this three-arm randomized controlled trial, patients were allocated to ESWT, HILT, or home exercise alone. Active modalities were applied for 3 weeks (nine sessions), and all groups followed the same exercise program. Assessments were performed at baseline, week 3, and week 12. The primary outcome was week 12 QuickDASH; secondary outcomes were VAS, Quinnell grade, grip strength, tip-pinch strength, Assessment of Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT), and Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT). Analyses included 116 completers (ESWT n = 39, HILT n = 45, home exercise n = 32). Week 12 QuickDASH scores differed significantly among groups (ESWT: 42.6 ± 18.3; HILT: 26.6 ± 16.5; home exercise: 51.2 ± 14.5; p < 0.001); effect sizes favored HILT versus home exercise (d = 1.60) and ESWT (d = 0.92). VAS scores were lowest in the HILT group at both follow-ups (p < 0.001). Quinnell grading favored HILT at week 3 (p = 0.009) and week 12 (p = 0.001). Grip strength was higher in both active-treatment groups than in home exercise at week 3 and week 12 (p = 0.007 and p < 0.001), whereas tip-pinch strength did not differ. PPT differed only at week 3 (p = 0.009), and baseline 9HPT imbalance was absent during follow-up. HILT may provide greater short-term improvements in pain and patient-reported function, while ESWT remains a useful non-invasive adjunct to home exercise.
- 15 July 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Rheumatology International
- Vol. 46 (8)
Comparative effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and high-intensity laser therapy in trigger finger: a randomized controlled trial
Trigger finger (TF) is stenosing tenosynovitis causing pain and impaired hand function. To compare extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) as adjuncts to home exercise in TF. In this three-arm randomized controlled trial, patients were allocated to ESWT, HILT, or home exercise alone. Active modalities were applied for 3 weeks (nine sessions), and all groups followed the same exercise program. Assessments were performed at baseline, week 3, and week 12. The primary outcome was week 12 QuickDASH; secondary outcomes were VAS, Quinnell grade, grip strength, tip-pinch strength, Assessment of Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT), and Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT). Analyses included 116 completers (ESWT n = 39, HILT n = 45, home exercise n = 32). Week 12 QuickDASH scores differed significantly among groups (ESWT: 42.6 ± 18.3; HILT: 26.6 ± 16.5; home exercise: 51.2 ± 14.5; p < 0.001); effect sizes favored HILT versus home exercise (d = 1.60) and ESWT (d = 0.92). VAS scores were lowest in the HILT group at both follow-ups (p < 0.001). Quinnell grading favored HILT at week 3 (p = 0.009) and week 12 (p = 0.001). Grip strength was higher in both active-treatment groups than in home exercise at week 3 and week 12 (p = 0.007 and p < 0.001), whereas tip-pinch strength did not differ. PPT differed only at week 3 (p = 0.009), and baseline 9HPT imbalance was absent during follow-up. HILT may provide greater short-term improvements in pain and patient-reported function, while ESWT remains a useful non-invasive adjunct to home exercise.
- Open Access
- 21 March 2025
- Published by Anatolian Current Medical Journal in Anatolian Current Medical Journal
- Vol. 7 (2) , 159-163
Comparison of outcomes of banding, nail brace, and Winograd techniques in the treatment of ingrown toenails
Aims: This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of three commonly used treatment methods—banding, nail brace, and the Winograd procedure—in patients with Heifetz stage 2 ingrown toenails. Parameters such as recurrence rate, infection rate, postoperative pain, and patient satisfaction were assessed to guide clinical decision-making. Methods: This retrospective study included 91 patients diagnosed with Heifetz stage 2 ingrown toenail, who were treated using one of three methods. Patients were divided into three groups: banding, nail brace, and Winograd procedure. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were recorded on the third postoperative day to assess pain levels. The short-term outcomes, recurrence rates, and complications were analyzed. Ethical approval was obtained and the study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Results: The nail brace method showed a significantly shorter return-to-work duration (mean 10.2±9.5 days) compared to the Winograd procedure (19.0±6.4 days, p
- 21 March 2025
- Published by Anatolian Current Medical Journal in Anatolian Current Medical Journal
- Vol. 7 (2) , 159-163
Open AccessComparison of outcomes of banding, nail brace, and Winograd techniques in the treatment of ingrown toenails
Aims: This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of three commonly used treatment methods—banding, nail brace, and the Winograd procedure—in patients with Heifetz stage 2 ingrown toenails. Parameters such as recurrence rate, infection rate, postoperative pain, and patient satisfaction were assessed to guide clinical decision-making. Methods: This retrospective study included 91 patients diagnosed with Heifetz stage 2 ingrown toenail, who were treated using one of three methods. Patients were divided into three groups: banding, nail brace, and Winograd procedure. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were recorded on the third postoperative day to assess pain levels. The short-term outcomes, recurrence rates, and complications were analyzed. Ethical approval was obtained and the study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Results: The nail brace method showed a significantly shorter return-to-work duration (mean 10.2±9.5 days) compared to the Winograd procedure (19.0±6.4 days, p
- 29 August 2024
- Published by Bilimsel Tip Publishing House in TOTBID Dergisi
- Vol. 23 (5) , 479-487
Elit sporcularda el ve el bileği kırıkları
- 29 August 2024
- Published by Bilimsel Tip Publishing House in TOTBID Dergisi
- Vol. 23 (5) , 479-487
Elit sporcularda el ve el bileği kırıkları