Byung Jae Kang
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Byung Jae Kang has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Hee Soo Yoon
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan Hospital, Ansan 15355, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - June Choi
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan 15208, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Kang Hyeon Lim
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan Hospital, Ansan 15355, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Min Jin Kim
Department of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 08308, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Min Suk Kim
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan Hospital, Ansan 15355, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Yoon Chan Rah
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan Hospital, Ansan 15355, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 10 September 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 14 (18) , 2000
Evaluating Prediction Models with Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly in Chronic Otitis Media Patients
Background: This retrospective, cross-sectional study aimed to assess the functional hearing capacity of individuals with Chronic Otitis Media (COM) using prediction modeling techniques and the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE) questionnaire. This study investigated the potential of predictive models to identify hearing levels in patients with COM. Methods: We comprehensively examined 289 individuals diagnosed with COM, of whom 136 reported tinnitus and 143 did not. This study involved a detailed analysis of various patient characteristics and HHIE questionnaire results. Logistic and Random Forest models were employed and compared based on key performance metrics. Results: The logistic model demonstrated a slightly higher accuracy (73.56%), area under the curve (AUC; 0.73), Kappa value (0.45), and F1 score (0.78) than the Random Forest model. These findings suggest the superior predictive performance of the logistic model in identifying hearing levels in patients with COM. Conclusions: Although the AUC for the logistic regression did not meet the benchmark, this study highlights the potential for enhanced reliability and improved performance metrics using a larger dataset. The integration of prediction modeling techniques and the HHIE questionnaire shows promise for achieving greater diagnostic accuracy and refining intervention strategies for individuals with COM.
- 10 September 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 14 (18) , 2000
Open AccessEvaluating Prediction Models with Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly in Chronic Otitis Media Patients
Background: This retrospective, cross-sectional study aimed to assess the functional hearing capacity of individuals with Chronic Otitis Media (COM) using prediction modeling techniques and the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE) questionnaire. This study investigated the potential of predictive models to identify hearing levels in patients with COM. Methods: We comprehensively examined 289 individuals diagnosed with COM, of whom 136 reported tinnitus and 143 did not. This study involved a detailed analysis of various patient characteristics and HHIE questionnaire results. Logistic and Random Forest models were employed and compared based on key performance metrics. Results: The logistic model demonstrated a slightly higher accuracy (73.56%), area under the curve (AUC; 0.73), Kappa value (0.45), and F1 score (0.78) than the Random Forest model. These findings suggest the superior predictive performance of the logistic model in identifying hearing levels in patients with COM. Conclusions: Although the AUC for the logistic regression did not meet the benchmark, this study highlights the potential for enhanced reliability and improved performance metrics using a larger dataset. The integration of prediction modeling techniques and the HHIE questionnaire shows promise for achieving greater diagnostic accuracy and refining intervention strategies for individuals with COM.