Manuel Ferreira

Canine hip dysplasia (CHD) screening relies on radiographic assessment, but traditional scoring methods often lack consistency due to inter-rater variability. This study presents an AI-driven system for automated measurement of the femoral head center to dorsal acetabular edge (FHC/DAE) distance, a key metric in CHD evaluation. Unlike most AI models that directly classify CHD severity using convolutional neural networks, this system provides an interpretable, measurement-based output to support a more transparent evaluation. The system combines a keypoint regression model for femoral head center localization with a U-Net-based segmentation model for acetabular edge delineation. It was trained on 7967 images for hip joint detection, 571 for keypoints, and 624 for acetabulum segmentation, all from ventrodorsal hip-extended radiographs. On a test set of 70 images, the keypoint model achieved high precision (Euclidean Distance = 0.055 mm; Mean Absolute Error = 0.0034 mm; Mean Squared Error = 2.52 × 10⁻⁵ mm²), while the segmentation model showed strong performance (Dice Score = 0.96; Intersection over Union = 0.92). Comparison with expert annotations demonstrated strong agreement (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients = 0.97 and 0.93; Weighted Kappa = 0.86 and 0.79; Standard Error of Measurement = 0.92 to 1.34 mm). By automating anatomical landmark detection, the system enhances standardization, reproducibility, and interpretability in CHD radiographic assessment. Its strong alignment with expert evaluations supports its integration into CHD screening workflows for more objective and efficient diagnosis and CHD scoring.

Canine hip dysplasia (CHD) screening relies on accurate positioning in the ventrodorsal hip extended (VDHE) view, as even mild pelvic rotation can affect CHD scoring and impact breeding decisions. This study aimed to assess the association between pelvic rotation and asymmetry in obturator foramina areas (AOFAs) and to develop a computer vision model for automated AOFA measurement. In the first part, 203 radiographs were analyzed to examine the relationship between pelvic rotation, assessed through asymmetry in iliac wing and obturator foramina widths (AOFWs), and AOFAs. A significant association was found between pelvic rotation and AOFA, with AOFW showing a stronger correlation (R² = 0.92, p < 0.01). AOFW rotation values were categorized into minimal (n = 71), moderate (n = 41), marked (n = 37), and extreme (n = 54) groups, corresponding to mean AOFA ± standard deviation values of 33.28 ± 27.25, 54.73 ± 27.98, 85.85 ± 41.31, and 160.68 ± 64.20 mm², respectively. ANOVA and post hoc testing confirmed significant differences in AOFA across these groups (p < 0.01). In part two, the dataset was expanded to 312 images to develop the automated AOFA model, with 80% allocated for training, 10% for validation, and 10% for testing. On the 32 test images, the model achieved high segmentation accuracy (Dice score = 0.96; Intersection over Union = 0.93), closely aligning with examiner measurements. Paired t-tests indicated no significant differences between the examiner and model’s outputs (p > 0.05), though the Bland–Altman analysis identified occasional discrepancies. The model demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC = 0.99) with a standard error of 17.18 mm². A threshold of 50.46 mm² enabled effective differentiation between acceptable and excessive pelvic rotation. With additional training data, further improvements in precision are expected, enhancing the model’s clinical utility.

Accurate radiographic screening evaluation is essential in the genetic control of canine HD, however, the qualitative assessment of hip congruency introduces some subjectivity, leading to excessive variability in scoring. The main objective of this work was to validate a method-Hip Congruency Index (HCI)-capable of objectively measuring the relationship between the acetabulum and the femoral head and associating it with the level of congruency proposed by the Fédération Cynologique Internationale (FCI), with the aim of incorporating it into a computer vision model that classifies HD autonomously. A total of 200 dogs (400 hips) were randomly selected for the study. All radiographs were scored in five categories by an experienced examiner according to FCI criteria. Two examiners performed HCI measurements on 25 hip radiographs to study intra- and inter-examiner reliability and agreement. Additionally, each examiner measured HCI on their half of the study sample (100 dogs), and the results were compared between FCI categories. The paired t-test and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showed no evidence of a systematic bias, and there was excellent reliability between the measurements of the two examiners and examiners’ sessions. Hips that were assigned an FCI grade of A (n = 120), B (n = 157), C (n = 68), D (n = 38) and E (n = 17) had a mean HCI of 0.739 ± 0.044, 0.666 ± 0.052, 0.605 ± 0.055, 0.494 ± 0.070 and 0.374 ± 0.122, respectively (ANOVA, p < 0.01). Therefore, these results show that HCI is a parameter capable of estimating hip congruency and has the potential to enrich conventional HD scoring criteria if incorporated into an artificial intelligence algorithm competent in diagnosing HD.