EFElizabeth Cristina Vieira de Freitas

Elizabeth Cristina Vieira de Freitas

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Elizabeth Cristina Vieira de Freitas has a total of 23 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Perfil químico e atividade toxicológica do extrato aquoso de Morinda citrifolia L. (Noni)

    by Vinicius Alves de Lima, Fernanda Morais de Negreiros, Milena Alves de Lima Sampaio, Elizabeth Cristina Vieira de Freitas, Vitor Lucas Araújo Cavalcante Martins, José Weverton Almeida-Bezerra, Damiana Gonçalves de Sousa Freitas, Eveline Naiara Nuvens Oliveira, Ana Letícia Gonçalves Pereira, Anna Lídia Nunes Varela, et al.

  • Open Access

    Co-Extraction of DNA and RNA from Candida albicans Using a Chemical Method in Conjunction with Silicon Carbide with Few Cells

    by Elizabeth Cristina Vieira de Freitas, Francisca Alves dos Santos, Maria Raíssa Vieira Lopes, Dárcio Luiz de Sousa Júnior, Tássia Thaís Al Yafawi, Ana Carolina Ferreira Araújo, Priscilla Ramos Freitas, Irwin Rose Alencar de Menezes, Henrique Douglas Melo Coutinho, Maria Karollyna Do Nascimento Silva Leandro

    Objective: The study aimed to optimize protocols for the joint extraction of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA) from 0.025 × 106 CFU of Candida albicans, targeting to overcome the challenges in the extraction of these genetic materials. Materials and methods: From this, treated silicon carbide (SiC) granules were added to fungal samples from methods 1, 2, and 3 obtained from aliquots of BHI or Sabouraud medium to cause cell lysis and enable the isolation of these macromolecules by phenol and chloroform. The concentration and integrity of the extracted nucleic acids were analyzed, respectively, by spectrophotometry using the A260/A280 ratios and 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Results: Therefore, method 3 is the one that most comprises samples considered pure of both DNA and RNA, simultaneously. Furthermore, the presence of intact RNAs corresponding to the base pair size such as 5.8 S rRNA and tRNA was verified during electrophoresis, considering the particularities of RNA, which makes it very unstable and easily degraded. Conclusions: Thus, it results in a faster and simpler method in addition to obtain promising results using minimal amounts of biological sample and offering a valuable alternative for small laboratories to work with molecular biology.

  • Open Access

    Co-extraction of DNA and RNA from Candida albicans Using a Chemical Method in Conjunction with Silicon Carbide with Few Cells

    by Elizabeth Cristina Vieira de Freitas, Francisca Alves dos Santos, Maria Raíssa Vieira Lopes, Dárcio Luiz de Sousa Júnior, Tássia Thaís Al Yafawi, Ana Carolina Ferreira Araújo, Priscilla Ramos Freitas, Irwin Rose Alencar de Menezes, Henrique Douglas Melo Coutinho, Maria Karollyna Do Nascimento Silva Leandro

    The study aimed to optimize protocols for the joint extraction of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA) from 0.025 x 106 CFU of Candida albicans, aiming to overcome challenges in the extraction of these genetic materials. From this, treated Silicon Carbide (SiC) granules were added to fungal samples from methods 1, 2 and 3 obtained from aliquots of BHI or Sabouraud medium to cause cell lysis and enable the isolation of these macromolecules by phenol and chloroform. The concentration and integrity of nucleic acids were obtained, respectively, by spectrophotometry using A260/A280 ratios and 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Therefore, method 3 is the one that most comprises samples considered pure of both DNA and RNA, simultaneously. Furthermore, the presence of intact RNAs corresponding to the base pair size, such as 5.8 S rRNA and tRNA, was verified during electrophoresis, taking into account the particularities of RNA, which makes it very unstable and easily degraded. Therefore, it results in a faster and simpler method in addition to obtaining promising results using minimal amounts of biological sample, thus offering a valuable alternative for small laboratories working with molecular biology.