Krista Eckels
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Krista Eckels has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Barbara Gomes
Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
1 shared publication - Beatriz Sanguedo
Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, Coimbra, 3000-548, Portugal
1 shared publication Dorothy A. Olet
Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, Coimbra, 3000-548, Portugal; Institute of Hospice and Palliative Care in Africa, Hospice Africa Uganda, Plot 130 Mobutu Road P.O.Box 7757, Kampala, Uganda
1 shared publication- Elizabeth Namukwaya
Department of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
1 shared publication - Emmanuelle Bélanger
Brown University School of Public Health
1 shared publication - Jenny Theodora van der Steen
King's College London Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care Policy and Rehabilitation London UK
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 7 October 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Health & Place
- Vol. 96, 103534
Places of end-of-life care and death in health policies of four countries (EOLinPLACE Project)
- 7 October 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Health & Place
- Vol. 96, 103534
Open AccessPlaces of end-of-life care and death in health policies of four countries (EOLinPLACE Project)
- 14 September 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Advances in Health Sciences Education
- Vol. 30 (3) , 679-709
Mapping the complexity of task demands during constant observation of patients with complex health behaviors
Unlicensed patient care assistants (PCAs) are often tasked with providing constant observation (CO) of patients with complex health behaviors. The unique demands of CO are poorly understood, making it challenging to design effective training. Four-component instructional design theory suggests the tasks associated with CO feature non-recurrent challenges, such that effective, simulation-based deliberate practice must reflect real-life variability. This study aimed to elucidate the variety of challenges PCAs encounter during CO of patients with complex health behaviors. We used a qualitative descriptive design and developed a preliminary framework to code interviews. The data collection framework was designed to support creating numerous realistic scenarios to support generalized and transferable learning. From our interviews with 16 participants, we identified 1,066 statements associated with variations in CO tasks. We grouped our findings by two domains, “patient factors” and “environmental contexts.” Our results revealed many recurring and non-recurring challenges inherent in CO, requiring a range of skills to maintain patient and staff safety. Instructional design elements may include scenarios incorporating environment and resource assessment, cognitive feedback for non-recurrent tasks, novel methods of self-harm initiated by the patient, and incorporating interdisciplinary staff in which the learner must navigate a complex conversation. This study clarifies the task demands of CO and is useful as a task analysis to guide scenario development for simulation-based experiences. A less systematic approach would risk underrepresenting the difficulties inherent in the task, reinforcing a limited set of behaviors that may not generalize well to the non-recurrent challenges in CO.
- 14 September 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Advances in Health Sciences Education
- Vol. 30 (3) , 679-709
Mapping the complexity of task demands during constant observation of patients with complex health behaviors
Unlicensed patient care assistants (PCAs) are often tasked with providing constant observation (CO) of patients with complex health behaviors. The unique demands of CO are poorly understood, making it challenging to design effective training. Four-component instructional design theory suggests the tasks associated with CO feature non-recurrent challenges, such that effective, simulation-based deliberate practice must reflect real-life variability. This study aimed to elucidate the variety of challenges PCAs encounter during CO of patients with complex health behaviors. We used a qualitative descriptive design and developed a preliminary framework to code interviews. The data collection framework was designed to support creating numerous realistic scenarios to support generalized and transferable learning. From our interviews with 16 participants, we identified 1,066 statements associated with variations in CO tasks. We grouped our findings by two domains, “patient factors” and “environmental contexts.” Our results revealed many recurring and non-recurring challenges inherent in CO, requiring a range of skills to maintain patient and staff safety. Instructional design elements may include scenarios incorporating environment and resource assessment, cognitive feedback for non-recurrent tasks, novel methods of self-harm initiated by the patient, and incorporating interdisciplinary staff in which the learner must navigate a complex conversation. This study clarifies the task demands of CO and is useful as a task analysis to guide scenario development for simulation-based experiences. A less systematic approach would risk underrepresenting the difficulties inherent in the task, reinforcing a limited set of behaviors that may not generalize well to the non-recurrent challenges in CO.