Mi Rong
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Mi Rong has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Yuan Yao
School of Foreign Languages, Central South University Changsha Hunan China
5 shared publications - Xuchuan (Winnie) Chen
National University of Defense Technology
2 shared publications - Nigel Mantou Lou
University of Victoria
1 shared publication Qingping Li
School of Foreign Languages, Central South University
1 shared publicationWendi Yang
School of Foreign Languages, Central South University , No. 932 Lushan South Road , Changsha City , Hunan Province , 410083 , China
1 shared publication- Xinhua Zhu
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 11 November 2026
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching
Using scaffolding to enhance student engagement with GenAI-generated feedback in L2 writing
Student engagement with generative AI (GenAI) feedback is central to effective second language (L2) writing development. However, behavioral, cognitive, and emotional challenges often undermine this engagement, limiting the pedagogical potential of GenAI feedback. This study examines the changes in 10 college students’ engagement with GenAI feedback associated with teacher and peer scaffolding in a Chinese English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) context. Data were collected through chat logs, essay drafts, and semi-structured interviews. The results show descriptive increases in students’ engagement with GenAI feedback during the interaction and revision phases, although to varying degrees. Teacher scaffolding such as systematic modeling, guided reflection, and real-time feedback, as well as peer scaffolding such as interpersonal relationship and group collaboration were found to be related to enhanced engagement. This study contributes to the literature on enhancement of student engagement with GenAI feedback and provides practical recommendations for GenAI use in L2 writing classes.
- 11 November 2026
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching
Using scaffolding to enhance student engagement with GenAI-generated feedback in L2 writing
Student engagement with generative AI (GenAI) feedback is central to effective second language (L2) writing development. However, behavioral, cognitive, and emotional challenges often undermine this engagement, limiting the pedagogical potential of GenAI feedback. This study examines the changes in 10 college students’ engagement with GenAI feedback associated with teacher and peer scaffolding in a Chinese English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) context. Data were collected through chat logs, essay drafts, and semi-structured interviews. The results show descriptive increases in students’ engagement with GenAI feedback during the interaction and revision phases, although to varying degrees. Teacher scaffolding such as systematic modeling, guided reflection, and real-time feedback, as well as peer scaffolding such as interpersonal relationship and group collaboration were found to be related to enhanced engagement. This study contributes to the literature on enhancement of student engagement with GenAI feedback and provides practical recommendations for GenAI use in L2 writing classes.
- Open Access
- 17 July 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Second Language Writing
- Vol. 73
Can GenAI deliver growth-oriented feedback? Evidence for enhancing learners’ growth mindset and adaptive motivation in second language writing
- 17 July 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Second Language Writing
- Vol. 73
Open AccessCan GenAI deliver growth-oriented feedback? Evidence for enhancing learners’ growth mindset and adaptive motivation in second language writing
- Open Access
- 10 April 2026
- Published by SAGE Publications in ECNU Review of Education
- Vol. 9 (2)
From Assistance to Advancement: A Systematic Review of How GenAI Supports L2 Writing Learning From the Lens of Activity Theory
Purpose: Despite the rapid proliferation of empirical studies on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in second language (L2) writing, a systematic review of how GenAI supports L2 writing learning remains scarce. This study aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive synthesis of existing research. Design/Approach/Method: We conducted a systematic review of 55 pertinent articles published in SSCI journals between January 2023 and July 2025, employing Activity Theory as our analytical framework. The review systematically examined six key components within the activity system: subjects (participant characteristics), tools (research instruments), community (research contexts), division of labor (social roles and power distribution), rules (procedural norms), and objects (learning goals). Findings: Our analysis revealed that tools, division of labor, and rules serve as mediating components that exert both positive and negative effects on learning objects (i.e., the goals of learning activities). The framework effectively captured the complex interactions among different elements within GenAI-assisted L2 writing research. Originality/Value: This study contributes to the literature by providing the first systematic review of GenAI-assisted L2 writing research within a theoretical framework. The Activity Theory perspective offers novel insights into understanding how different components interact in this emerging field.
- 10 April 2026
- Published by SAGE Publications in ECNU Review of Education
- Vol. 9 (2)
Open AccessFrom Assistance to Advancement: A Systematic Review of How GenAI Supports L2 Writing Learning From the Lens of Activity Theory
Purpose: Despite the rapid proliferation of empirical studies on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in second language (L2) writing, a systematic review of how GenAI supports L2 writing learning remains scarce. This study aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive synthesis of existing research. Design/Approach/Method: We conducted a systematic review of 55 pertinent articles published in SSCI journals between January 2023 and July 2025, employing Activity Theory as our analytical framework. The review systematically examined six key components within the activity system: subjects (participant characteristics), tools (research instruments), community (research contexts), division of labor (social roles and power distribution), rules (procedural norms), and objects (learning goals). Findings: Our analysis revealed that tools, division of labor, and rules serve as mediating components that exert both positive and negative effects on learning objects (i.e., the goals of learning activities). The framework effectively captured the complex interactions among different elements within GenAI-assisted L2 writing research. Originality/Value: This study contributes to the literature by providing the first systematic review of GenAI-assisted L2 writing research within a theoretical framework. The Activity Theory perspective offers novel insights into understanding how different components interact in this emerging field.
- Top Cited Papers
- 30 July 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Computer Assisted Language Learning
- p. 1-30
Exploring student engagement with artificial intelligence-guided chatbot feedback in EFL writing: interactions and revisions
- 30 July 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Computer Assisted Language Learning
- p. 1-30
Top Cited PapersExploring student engagement with artificial intelligence-guided chatbot feedback in EFL writing: interactions and revisions
- 10 September 2024
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Applied Linguistics
- Vol. 35 (1) , 344-362
Investigating EFL teacher agency in instructional practice of blended learning in Chinese higher education: An activity theory perspective
Teacher agency is considered a key driver of teacher professional growth, student improvement, and educational change. This study contributes to the sparse research on language teacher agency in blended learning (BL). Using activity theory to conceptualize teacher agency, this study explores how two English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers exerted agency while implementing BL at a Chinese university. This study also examines the factors that mediate the exercise of agency. Data were collected through classroom observations, interviews with both teachers and their students, and course documents to provide a thorough understanding of teachers’ experiences with blended teaching. The data analysis revealed that successful agentic actions to address contradictions included selecting the appropriate delivery to match learning goals, making good use of online tools for interaction, assigning students active roles, flexibly enacting rules, and building a supportive climate. However, some contradictions within the instructional activity system remain unresolved. Mediating factors such as tools (teachers’ expertise and beliefs), community (students and other professors), and rules (curriculum assessment) were found to shape teacher agency in the BL context. This study contributes to the literature on teacher agency in BL, and provides practical recommendations for teacher professional development and curriculum reform.
- 10 September 2024
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Applied Linguistics
- Vol. 35 (1) , 344-362
Investigating EFL teacher agency in instructional practice of blended learning in Chinese higher education: An activity theory perspective
Teacher agency is considered a key driver of teacher professional growth, student improvement, and educational change. This study contributes to the sparse research on language teacher agency in blended learning (BL). Using activity theory to conceptualize teacher agency, this study explores how two English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers exerted agency while implementing BL at a Chinese university. This study also examines the factors that mediate the exercise of agency. Data were collected through classroom observations, interviews with both teachers and their students, and course documents to provide a thorough understanding of teachers’ experiences with blended teaching. The data analysis revealed that successful agentic actions to address contradictions included selecting the appropriate delivery to match learning goals, making good use of online tools for interaction, assigning students active roles, flexibly enacting rules, and building a supportive climate. However, some contradictions within the instructional activity system remain unresolved. Mediating factors such as tools (teachers’ expertise and beliefs), community (students and other professors), and rules (curriculum assessment) were found to shape teacher agency in the BL context. This study contributes to the literature on teacher agency in BL, and provides practical recommendations for teacher professional development and curriculum reform.