Nishank Raisinghani

The rapid evolution of SARS-CoV-2 has led to the emergence of variants with increased immune evasion capabilities, posing significant challenges to antibody-based therapeutics and vaccines. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive structural and energetic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) complexes with neutralizing antibodies from four distinct groups (A–D), including group A LY-CoV016, group B AZD8895 and REGN10933, group C LY-CoV555, and group D antibodies AZD1061, REGN10987, and LY-CoV1404. Using coarse-grained simplified simulation models, rapid energy-based mutational scanning, and rigorous MM-GBSA binding free energy calculations, we elucidated the molecular mechanisms of antibody binding and escape mechanisms, identified key binding hotspots, and explored the evolutionary strategies employed by the virus to evade neutralization. The residue-based decomposition analysis revealed energetic mechanisms and thermodynamic factors underlying the effect of mutations on antibody binding. The results demonstrate excellent qualitative agreement between the predicted binding hotspots and the latest experiments on antibody escape. These findings provide valuable insights into the molecular determinants of antibody binding and viral escape, highlighting the importance of targeting conserved epitopes and leveraging combination therapies to mitigate the risk of immune evasion.

A growing body of experimental and computational studies suggests that the cross-neutralization antibody activity against Omicron variants may be driven by the balance and tradeoff between multiple energetic factors and interaction contributions of the evolving escape hotspots involved in antigenic drift and convergent evolution. However, the dynamic and energetic details quantifying the balance and contribution of these factors, particularly the balancing nature of specific interactions formed by antibodies with epitope residues, remain largely uncharacterized. In this study, we performed molecular dynamics simulations, an ensemble-based deep mutational scanning of SARS-CoV-2 spike residues, and binding free energy computations for two distinct groups of broadly neutralizing antibodies: the E1 group (BD55-3152, BD55-3546, and BD5-5840) and the F3 group (BD55-3372, BD55-4637, and BD55-5514). Using these approaches, we examined the energetic determinants by which broadly potent antibodies can largely evade immune resistance. Our analysis revealed the emergence of a small number of immune escape positions for E1 group antibodies that correspond to the R346 and K444 positions in which the strong van der Waals and interactions act synchronously, leading to the large binding contribution. According to our results, the E1 and F3 groups of Abs effectively exploit binding hotspot clusters of hydrophobic sites that are critical for spike functions along with the selective complementary targeting of positively charged sites that are important for ACE2 binding. Together with targeting conserved epitopes, these groups of antibodies can lead expand the breadth and resilience of neutralization to the antigenic shifts associated with viral evolution. The results of this study and the energetic analysis demonstrate excellent qualitative agreement between the predicted binding hotspots and critical mutations with respect to the latest experiments on average antibody escape scores. We argue that the E1 and F3 groups of antibodies targeting binding epitopes may leverage strong hydrophobic interactions with the binding epitope hotspots that are critical for the spike stability and ACE2 binding, while escape mutations tend to emerge in sites associated with synergistically strong hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions.

The rapid evolution of SARS-CoV-2 has led to the emergence of variants with increased immune evasion capabilities, posing significant challenges to antibody-based therapeutics and vaccines. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive structural and energetic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) complexes with neutralizing antibodies from four distinct groups (A-D), including group A LY-CoV016, group B AZD8895 and REGN10933, group C LY-CoV555, and group D antibodies AZD1061, REGN10987, and LY-CoV1404. Using coarse-grained simplified simulation models, rapid energy-based mutational scanning, and rigorous MM-GBSA binding free energy calculations, we elucidated the molecular mechanisms of antibody binding and group-specific escape mechanisms, identified key binding hotspots, and explored the evolutionary strategies employed by the virus to evade neutralization The structural analysis and mutational profiling revealed distinct binding mechanisms and epitope specificities for each antibody group, which directly influence their neutralization potency and susceptibility to escape mutations. The MM-GBSA binding free energy analysis identified critical binding hotspots and quantified the contributions of van der Waals and electrostatic interactions to antibody binding. The results showed that key binding hotspots, such as F456, F486, and V445, are dominated by van der Waals interactions, while residues like K417, E484, and K444 contribute significantly through electrostatic interactions. Mutations at these sites, including K417N, E484K, and K444Q, are frequently observed in emerging variants and enable immune evasion by disrupting antibody binding. We identified synergistic effects of van der Waals and electrostatic interactions at key residues K417, F486, and K444 underscore their dual role in binding and immune evasion. Mutations at these sites disrupt both types of interactions, leading to significant reductions in binding affinity and susceptibility to escape mutations. These findings align with experimental data, which identify these residues as dominant escape hotspots. The residue-based decomposition analysis revealed energetic mechanisms and thermodynamic factors underlying the effect of mutations on antibody binding. The results of this energetic analysis demonstrate excellent qualitative agreement between the predicted binding hotspots and critical mutations with respect to the latest experiments on average antibody escape scores. These findings provide valuable insights into the molecular determinants of antibody binding and viral escape, highlighting the importance of targeting conserved epitopes and leveraging combination therapies to mitigate the risk of immune evasion.

Proteins often exist in multiple conformational states, influenced by the binding of ligands or substrates. The study of these states, particularly the apo (unbound) and holo (ligand-bound) forms, is crucial for understanding protein function, dynamics, and interactions. In the current study, we use AlphaFold2, which combines randomized alanine sequence masking with shallow multiple sequence alignment subsampling to expand the conformational diversity of the predicted structural ensembles and capture conformational changes between apo and holo protein forms. Using several well-established datasets of structurally diverse apo-holo protein pairs, the proposed approach enables robust predictions of apo and holo structures and conformational ensembles, while also displaying notably similar dynamics distributions. These observations are consistent with the view that the intrinsic dynamics of allosteric proteins are defined by the structural topology of the fold and favor conserved conformational motions driven by soft modes. Our findings provide evidence that AlphaFold2 combined with randomized alanine sequence masking can yield accurate and consistent results in predicting moderate conformational adjustments between apo and holo states, especially for proteins with localized changes upon ligand binding. For large hinge-like domain movements, the proposed approach can predict functional conformations characteristic of both apo and ligand-bound holo ensembles in the absence of ligand information. These results are relevant for using this AlphaFold adaptation for probing conformational selection mechanisms according to which proteins can adopt multiple conformations, including those that are competent for ligand binding. The results of this study indicate that robust modeling of functional protein states may require more accurate characterization of flexible regions in functional conformations and the detection of high-energy conformations. By incorporating a wider variety of protein structures in training datasets, including both apo and holo forms, the model can learn to recognize and predict the structural changes that occur upon ligand binding.

Despite the success of AlphaFold2 approaches in predicting single protein structures, these methods showed intrinsic limitations in predicting multiple functional conformations of allosteric proteins and have been challenged to accurately capture the effects of single point mutations that induced significant structural changes. We examined several implementations of AlphaFold2 methods to predict conformational ensembles for state-switching mutants of the ABL kinase. The results revealed that a combination of randomized alanine sequence masking with shallow multiple sequence alignment subsampling can significantly expand the conformational diversity of the predicted structural ensembles and capture shifts in populations of the active and inactive ABL states. Consistent with the NMR experiments, the predicted conformational ensembles for M309L/L320I and M309L/H415P ABL mutants that perturb the regulatory spine networks featured the increased population of the fully closed inactive state. The proposed adaptation of AlphaFold can reproduce the experimentally observed mutation-induced redistributions in the relative populations of the active and inactive ABL states and capture the effects of regulatory mutations on allosteric structural rearrangements of the kinase domain. The ensemble-based network analysis complemented AlphaFold predictions by revealing allosteric hotspots that correspond to state-switching mutational sites which may explain the global effect of regulatory mutations on structural changes between the ABL states. This study suggested that attention-based learning of long-range dependencies between sequence positions in homologous folds and deciphering patterns of allosteric interactions may further augment the predictive abilities of AlphaFold methods for modeling of alternative protein sates, conformational ensembles and mutation-induced structural transformations.