Angela Leone
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Angela Leone has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Chiara Cambise
Department of Emergency, University-Hospital Gemelli IRCSS, 00168 Roma, Italy
1 shared publication - Elisa Meacci
Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli”, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Flaminio Sessa
Department of Emergency, Anesthesiologic and Reanimation Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Giovanna Beccia
Department of Emergency, Anesthesiological and Reanimation Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Giovanni Punzo
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli”, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Liliana Sollazzi
Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e della Rianimazione, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 20 September 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 13 (18) , 5589
Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Using Pulse Pressure Variation in Thoracic Surgery Requiring One-Lung Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: Intraoperative fluid management based on pulse pressure variation has shown potential to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and improve clinical outcomes in various surgical settings. However, its efficacy and safety have not been assessed in patients undergoing thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation. Methods: Patients scheduled for pulmonary lobectomy using uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery approach were randomly assigned to two groups. In the PPV group, fluid administration was guided by the pulse pressure variation parameter, while in the near-zero group, it was guided by conventional hemodynamic parameters. The primary outcome was the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/ fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio 15 min after extubation. The secondary outcomes included extubation time, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the first three postoperative days, and the length of hospital stay. Results: The PaO2/FiO2 ratio did not differ between the two groups (364.48 ± 38.06 vs. 359.21 ± 36.95; p = 0.51), although patients in the PPV group (n = 44) received a larger amount of both crystalloids (1145 ± 470.21 vs. 890 ± 459.31, p = 0.01) and colloids (162.5 ± 278.31 vs 18.18 ± 94.68, p = 0.002) compared to the near-zero group (n = 44). No differences were found in extubation time, type and number of PPCs, and length of hospital stay. Conclusions: PPV-guided fluid management in thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation does not improve pulmonary gas exchange as measured by the PaO2/FiO2 ratio and does not seem to offer clinical benefits. Additionally, it results in increased fluid administration compared to fluid management based on conventional hemodynamic parameters.
- 20 September 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 13 (18) , 5589
Open AccessGoal-Directed Fluid Therapy Using Pulse Pressure Variation in Thoracic Surgery Requiring One-Lung Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: Intraoperative fluid management based on pulse pressure variation has shown potential to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and improve clinical outcomes in various surgical settings. However, its efficacy and safety have not been assessed in patients undergoing thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation. Methods: Patients scheduled for pulmonary lobectomy using uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery approach were randomly assigned to two groups. In the PPV group, fluid administration was guided by the pulse pressure variation parameter, while in the near-zero group, it was guided by conventional hemodynamic parameters. The primary outcome was the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/ fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio 15 min after extubation. The secondary outcomes included extubation time, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the first three postoperative days, and the length of hospital stay. Results: The PaO2/FiO2 ratio did not differ between the two groups (364.48 ± 38.06 vs. 359.21 ± 36.95; p = 0.51), although patients in the PPV group (n = 44) received a larger amount of both crystalloids (1145 ± 470.21 vs. 890 ± 459.31, p = 0.01) and colloids (162.5 ± 278.31 vs 18.18 ± 94.68, p = 0.002) compared to the near-zero group (n = 44). No differences were found in extubation time, type and number of PPCs, and length of hospital stay. Conclusions: PPV-guided fluid management in thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation does not improve pulmonary gas exchange as measured by the PaO2/FiO2 ratio and does not seem to offer clinical benefits. Additionally, it results in increased fluid administration compared to fluid management based on conventional hemodynamic parameters.