MMMemory Makamba

Memory Makamba

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Memory Makamba has a total of 36 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Mechanisms of action of a community-led HIV prevention and treatment programme for female sex workers in Zimbabwe: a mixed-method analysis

    by Joanna Busza, Harriet S Jones, Primrose Matambanadzo, Tsitsi Hove, Sungai T Chabata, Tatenda Kujeke, Memory Makamba, Gracious Madimutsa, Fortunate Machingura, Frances M Cowan, et al.

    Background: Community-led interventions for female sex workers (FSW) can improve HIV prevention and treatment outcomes by lowering self-stigma and strengthening social cohesion to improve service uptake. In Zimbabwe, the AMETHIST intervention trial integrated peer-led microplanning with self-help groups for FSW and demonstrated improved HIV treatment outcomes. We investigated the role of social cohesion and self-stigma in explaining these findings. Method: We conducted a mixed-method analysis of data collected during AMETHIST. We re-analysed qualitative data from interviews and group discussions to identify narratives linking self-stigma, engagement with microplanners and/or self-help groups and HIV service use. We analysed quantitative data from endline respondent-driven sampling surveys for differences in self-reported measures of social cohesion and self-stigma between trial arms, and between those who did and did not participate in intervention activities or access services. Results: In both arms, FSW self-reported engaging with peer supporters, participating in self-help groups and accessing HIV services. Qualitative narratives suggested peer support and group participation could reduce self-stigma and support service uptake. Lower levels of self-stigma were seen in the intervention arm (58.6% vs 63.2%; aOR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61-0.86). Social cohesion exceeded 50% across the whole sample, but was not associated with study arm, nor with engagement in intervention-related activities. Discussion: Although qualitative data suggested some FSW felt their uptake of services was influenced by intervention components, quantitative analyses did not suggest either variable was on the causal pathway to the outcomes of the intervention. A limitation may have been the measurement of these complex constructs and the high levels of social cohesion across both study arms. Contributions to the literature: - Community-led, empowerment-based interventions are the cornerstone of effective HIV responses for sex workers. The hypothesised mechanisms of improved social cohesion and self-efficacy through which these work to increase HIV services uptake are less well understood. - Our study contributes to evidence on the social mechanisms through which community based interventions work to improve HIV outcomes among female sex workers in Zimbabwe - Our study found that female sex workers who more frequently accessed HIV services were more likely to report higher levels of social cohesion, but was unable to establish whether this was a mechanism along the pathway between intervention engagement and improved HIV outcomes Our study indicated that reductions in self-stigma through peer-led community-based support are important for HIV programme implementation; increasing the uptake of HIV services and improving HIV outcomes

  • Open Access

    Comparing the test performance of dried-blood-spot and plasma HIV recent infection testing samples in a nationally scaled sex worker programme in Zimbabwe

    by Brian D. Rice, Harriet S. Jones, Fortunate Machingura, Leah Gaihai, Memory Makamba, Thomas Chanyowedza, Panganai Masvikeni, Edward Matsikire, Primrose Matambanadzo, Sithembile Musemburi, et al.

    Recency testing can provide strategic insights as to whether a person newly diagnosed with HIV recently acquired their infection or not. To understand potential biases associated with HIV recency testing, we explored the extent sample type influences whether a person is assigned as being recent. Implementing a laboratory-based Recent Infection Testing Algorithm (RITA) across the Centre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR) key populations programme in Zimbabwe between October 2021 and January 2023, we compared plasma-based and dried-bloodspot (DBS) HIV recency samples. Over the study period, 24,976 individual female sex workers HIV tested, of whom 9.5% (2,363/24,979) newly tested HIV positive. Of these 2,363 women, 55.5% (1311/2,363) were offered and gave consent for a sample to be taken for DBS recency and viral load testing, among whom 11.7% (153/1,311) were classified as having a recent infection. A subset of 464 women were offered and consented to paired sample collection, among whom 10.1% (47) and 12.3% (57) of plasma and DBS samples, respectively, were classified as recent. Overall, categorical determination was good, with 97% of results concordant. Of 58 women with paired sample collection who had a test result classified as recent, 46 (79.3%) were concordant recent on both DBS and plasma, with 12 (20.7%) being discordant. Of these 12 women’s samples, 11 were deemed long-standing by the plasma assay but recent by the paired DBS, and one deemed long-standing by DBS but recent by the paired plasma sample. On average, plasma samples had a higher normalised optical density than DBS samples (mean difference of 0.53). Depending on use-case and setting, there are trade-offs when considering DBS or plasma-based samples between test performance and ease of implementation. Our data can help inform statistical adjustments to harmonise cut-offs on DBS and plasma assays, thereby improving the use and interpretation of recency assays in population-level HIV surveillance activities.

  • Open Access

    Comparing the test performance of dried-blood-spot and plasma HIV recent infection testing samples in a nationally scaled sex worker programme in Zimbabwe

    by Brian D Rice, Harriet S Jones, Fortunate Machingura, Leah Gaihai, Memory Makamba, Thomas Chanyowedza, Panganai Masvikeni, Edward Matsikire, Primrose Matambanadzo, Sithembile Musemburi, et al.

    Recency testing can provide strategic insights as to whether a person newly diagnosed with HIV recently acquired their infection or not. To understand potential biases associated with HIV recency testing, we explored the extent sample type influences whether a person is assigned as being recent. Implementing a laboratory-based Recent Infection Testing Algorithm (RITA) across the Centre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR) key populations programme in Zimbabwe between October 2021 and January 2023, we compared plasma-based and dried-bloodspot (DBS) HIV recency samples. Over the study period, 24,976 individual female sex workers HIV tested, of whom 9.5% (2,363/24,979) newly tested HIV positive. Of these 2,363 women, 55.5% (1311/2,363) were offered and gave consent for a sample to be taken for DBS recency and viral load testing, among whom 11.7% (153/1,311) were classified as having a recent infection. A subset of 464 women were offered and consented to paired sample collection, among whom 10.1% (47) and 12.3% (57) of plasma and DBS samples, respectively, were classified as recent. Overall, categorical determination was good, with 97% of results concordant. Of 58 women with paired sample collection who had a test result classified as recent, 46 (79.3%) were concordant recent on both DBS and plasma, with 12 (20.7%) being dis-concordant. Of these 12 women’s samples, 11 were deemed long-standing by the plasma assay but recent by the paired DBS, and one deemed long-standing by DBS but recent by the paired plasma sample. Depending on use-case and setting, there are trade-offs when considering DBS or plasma-based samples between test performance and ease of implementation. Our data can help inform statistical adjustments to harmonise cut-offs on DBS and plasma assays, thereby improving the use and interpretation of recency assays in population-level HIV surveillance activities.

  • Open Access

    Preferences for oral-fluid-based or blood-based HIV self-testing and provider-delivered testing: an observational study among different populations in Zimbabwe

    by Webster Mavhu, Memory Makamba, Karin Hatzold, Galven Maringwa, Albert Takaruza, Miriam Mutseta, Getrude Ncube, Frances M. Cowan, Euphemia L. Sibanda

    Background: There is limited data on client preferences for different HIV self-testing (HIVST) and provider-delivered testing options and associated factors. We explored client preferences for oral-fluid-based self-testing (OFBST), blood-based self-testing (BBST) and provider-delivered blood-based testing (PDBBT) among different populations. Methods: At clinics providing HIV testing services to general populations (1 urban, 1 rural clinic), men seeking voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC, 1 clinic), and female sex workers (FSW, 1 clinic), clients had the option to test using OFBST, BBST or PDBBT. A pre-test questionnaire collected information on demographics and testing history. Two weeks after collecting a self-test kit, participants responded to a questionnaire. We used logistic regression to determine predictors of choices. We also conducted 20 in-depth interviews to contextualise quantitative findings. Results: May to June 2019, we recruited 1244 participants of whom 249 (20%), 251 (20%), 244 (20%) and 500 (40%) were attending urban general, rural, VMMC and FSW clinics, respectively. Half (n = 619, 50%) chose OFBST, 440 (35%) and 185 (15%) chose BBST and PDBBT, respectively. In multivariable analysis comparing those choosing HIVST (OFBST and BBST combined) versus not, those who had never married aOR 0.57 (95% CI 0.34–0.93) and those previously married aOR0.56 (0.34–0.93) were less likely versus married participants to choose HIVST. HIVST preference increased with education, aOR 2.00 (1.28–3.13), 2.55 (1.28–5.07), 2.76 (1.48–5.14) for ordinary, advanced and tertiary education, respectively versus none/primary education. HIVST preference decreased with age aOR 0.97 (0.96–0.99). Urban participants were more likely than rural ones to choose HIVST, aOR 9.77 (5.47–17.41), 3.38 (2.03–5.62) and 2.23 (1.38–3.61) for FSW, urban general and VMMC clients, respectively. Comparing those choosing OFBST with those choosing BBST, less literate participants were less likely to choose oral fluid tests, aOR 0.29 (0.09–0.92). Conclusions: Most testing clients opted for OFBST, followed by BBST and lastly, PDBBT. Those who self-assessed as less healthy were more likely to opt for PDBBT which likely facilitated linkage. Results show importance of continued provision of all strategies in order to meet needs of different populations, and may be useful to inform both HIVST kit stock projections and tailoring of HIVST programs to meet the needs of different populations.