Ben O’grady

Heart rate variability (HRV), particularly the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), is widely used as a non-invasive indicator of autonomic nervous system activity and physiological recovery. This study examined whether daily short-term HRV, measured under standardised morning conditions, was associated with self-reported wellness in a non-clinical adult population. Over a 14-day period, 41 participants completed daily five-minute HRV recordings using a Polar H10 chest sensor and the Kubios mobile app, followed by ratings of sleep quality, fatigue, stress, and physical recovery. Bayesian ordinal mixed-effects models revealed that higher RMSSD values were associated with better self-reported sleep (β = 0.510, 95% HDI: 0.239 to 0.779), lower fatigue (β = 0.281, 95% HDI: 0.020 to 0.562), and reduced stress (β = 0.353, 95% HDI: 0.059 to 0.606), even after adjusting for covariates. No association was found between RMSSD and perceived muscle soreness. These findings support the interpretability of RMSSD as a physiological marker of daily recovery and stress in real-world settings. While the effect sizes were modest and individual variability remained substantial, results suggest that consistent HRV monitoring may offer meaningful insight into subjective wellness—particularly when contextualised and tracked over time.

Background: The increasing prevalence of sedentary lifestyles has prompted the development of innovative public health interventions, such as smartphone apps that deliver personalized exercise programs. The widespread availability of mobile technologies (eg, smartphone apps and wearable activity trackers) provides a cost-effective, scalable way to remotely deliver personalized exercise programs to users. Using machine learning (ML), specifically reinforcement learning (RL), may enhance user engagement and effectiveness of these programs by tailoring them to individual preferences and needs. Objective: The primary aim was to investigate the impact of the Samsung-developed i80 BPM app, implementing ML for exercise prescription, on user satisfaction and exercise intensity among the general population. The secondary objective was to assess the effectiveness of ML-generated exercise programs for remote prescription of exercise to members of the public. Methods: Participants were randomized to complete 3 exercise sessions per week for 12 weeks using the i80 BPM mobile app, crossing over weekly between intervention and control conditions. The intervention condition involved individualizing exercise sessions using RL, based on user preferences such as exercise difficulty, selection, and intensity, whereas under the control condition, exercise sessions were not individualized. Exercise intensity (measured by the 10-item Borg scale) and user satisfaction (measured by the 8-item version of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale) were recorded after the session. Results: In total, 62 participants (27 male and 42 female participants; mean age 43, SD 13 years) completed 559 exercise sessions over 12 weeks (9 sessions per participant). Generalized estimating equations showed that participants were more likely to exercise at a higher intensity (intervention: mean intensity 5.82, 95% CI 5.59‐6.05 and control: mean intensity 5.19, 95% CI 4.97‐5.41) and report higher satisfaction (RL: mean satisfaction 4, 95% CI 3.9-4.1 and baseline: mean satisfaction 3.73, 95% CI 3.6-3.8) in the RL model condition. Conclusions: The findings suggest that RL can effectively increase both the intensity with which people exercise and their enjoyment of the sessions, highlighting the potential of ML to enhance remote exercise interventions. This study underscores the benefits of personalized exercise prescriptions in increasing adherence and satisfaction, which are crucial for the long-term effectiveness of fitness programs. Further research is warranted to explore the long-term impacts and potential scalability of RL-enhanced exercise apps in diverse populations. This study contributes to the understanding of digital health interventions in exercise science, suggesting that personalized, app-based exercise prescriptions may be more effective than traditional, nonpersonalized methods. The integration of RL into exercise apps could significantly impact public health, particularly in enhancing engagement and reducing the global burden of physical inactivity.

The widespread use of wearable devices has enabled continuous monitoring of biometric data, including heart rate variability (HRV) and resting heart rate (RHR). However, the validity of these measurements, particularly from consumer devices like Apple Watch, remains underexplored. This study aimed to validate HRV measurements obtained from Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2 against the Polar H10 chest strap paired with the Kubios HRV software, which together served as the reference standard. A prospective cohort of 39 healthy adults provided 316 HRV measurements over a 14-day period. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to assess the difference in HRV between devices, accounting for repeated measures. Apple Watch tended to underestimate HRV by an average of 8.31 ms compared to the Polar H10 (p = 0.025), with a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 28.88% and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 20.46 ms. The study found no significant impact of RHR discrepancies on HRV differences (p = 0.156), with RHR showing a mean difference of −0.08 bpm, an MAPE of 5.91%, and an MAE of 3.73 bpm. Equivalence testing indicated that the HRV measurements from Apple Watch did not fall within the pre-specified equivalence margin of ±10 ms. Despite accurate RHR measurements, these findings underscore the need for improved HRV algorithms in consumer wearables and caution in interpreting HRV data for clinical or performance monitoring.