Andreea-Alexandra Lupu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Andreea-Alexandra Lupu has a total of 23 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Mădălina Gabriela Iliescu
Faculty of Medicine, Doctoral School, “Ovidius” University of Constanta, 1 University Alley, Campus-Corp B, 900470 Constanta, Romania
5 shared publications - Laszlo Irsay
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinical Rehabilitation Hospital, 400066 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3 shared publications - Viorela Mihaela Ciortea
Department of Physical Medicine, Balneotherapy and Rehabilitation, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3 shared publications - Andreea-Dalila Nedelcu
Faculty of Medicine, Doctoral School, “Ovidius” University of Constanta, 1 University Alley, Campus-Corp B, 900470 Constanta, Romania
2 shared publications - Mihaela Minea
Faculty of Medicine, Doctoral School, “Ovidius” University of Constanta, 1 University Alley, Campus-Corp B, 900470 Constanta, Romania
2 shared publications - Adelina Elena Ungureanu
Medical Doctoral School, Faculty of Medicine, Ovidius University of Constanta, 1 University Alley, Campus—Corp B, 900470 Constanta, Romania
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Reliability in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study of Cartilage Thickness, Osteophytes and Weight-Bearing Meniscal Extrusion
Background and Objectives: Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) is increasingly used to assess structural changes in knee osteoarthritis (KOA), although measurement reproducibility may vary with examination protocol and operator experience. This pilot study aimed to evaluate intra- and inter-observer reliability for assessing cartilage thickness, osteophyte dimensions and meniscal displacement in supine and weight-bearing conditions in patients with KOA. Material and Methods: This prospective reliability study included patients with KOA stages 2–3 on the Kellgren–Lawrence (K-L) scale. Ultrasound (US) evaluation of cartilage thickness and osteophytes was performed in the supine position, while medial and lateral meniscal extrusion was additionally assessed in bipedal and single-leg conditions using a standardized protocol. Intra- and inter-reproducibility were evaluated through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), agreement analysis and kappa statistics. The analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel (version 2019) and IBM SPSS version 26 software. Results: Both inter-reliability and intra-reliability were evaluated, with intra-rater agreement being constantly higher than inter-rater agreement. From the inter-rater reliability, ICC values ranged from 0.48 to 0.88 for quantitative ultrasound measurements, whereas osteophyte assessment showed Cohen’s k values ranging from 0.71 to 0.86, indicating substantial to almost perfect agreement. Both evaluators identified a higher number of knees with medial meniscal extrusion > 3 mm under weight-bearing conditions than in the supine position. Conclusions: Standardized US evaluation demonstrated at least good reproducibility for structural abnormalities in KOA. Medial and lateral meniscal displacement increased under loading conditions, highlighting the added value of dynamic weight-bearing assessment. However, the clinical significance of load-dependent meniscal extrusion requires further investigation.
Open AccessMusculoskeletal Ultrasound Reliability in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study of Cartilage Thickness, Osteophytes and Weight-Bearing Meniscal Extrusion
Background and Objectives: Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) is increasingly used to assess structural changes in knee osteoarthritis (KOA), although measurement reproducibility may vary with examination protocol and operator experience. This pilot study aimed to evaluate intra- and inter-observer reliability for assessing cartilage thickness, osteophyte dimensions and meniscal displacement in supine and weight-bearing conditions in patients with KOA. Material and Methods: This prospective reliability study included patients with KOA stages 2–3 on the Kellgren–Lawrence (K-L) scale. Ultrasound (US) evaluation of cartilage thickness and osteophytes was performed in the supine position, while medial and lateral meniscal extrusion was additionally assessed in bipedal and single-leg conditions using a standardized protocol. Intra- and inter-reproducibility were evaluated through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), agreement analysis and kappa statistics. The analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel (version 2019) and IBM SPSS version 26 software. Results: Both inter-reliability and intra-reliability were evaluated, with intra-rater agreement being constantly higher than inter-rater agreement. From the inter-rater reliability, ICC values ranged from 0.48 to 0.88 for quantitative ultrasound measurements, whereas osteophyte assessment showed Cohen’s k values ranging from 0.71 to 0.86, indicating substantial to almost perfect agreement. Both evaluators identified a higher number of knees with medial meniscal extrusion > 3 mm under weight-bearing conditions than in the supine position. Conclusions: Standardized US evaluation demonstrated at least good reproducibility for structural abnormalities in KOA. Medial and lateral meniscal displacement increased under loading conditions, highlighting the added value of dynamic weight-bearing assessment. However, the clinical significance of load-dependent meniscal extrusion requires further investigation.
- Open Access
Hydrotherapy in the Rehabilitation of Functional Performance and Gait in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background and Objectives: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a degenerative joint disease that affects quality of life through pain, impaired functional performance, and altered gait patterns. Hydrotherapy is a well-tolerated form of physical rehabilitation, especially suitable for patients with severe pain, as water’s properties support movement while reducing joint load. Its effects have been widely studied, primarily focusing on patient-reported outcomes, with limited synthesis of functional performance and gait-related outcomes. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, PEDro, SpringerLink, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search strategy included a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords. For example, the PubMed search strategy was as follows: (“knee osteoarthritis” OR “knee OA”) AND (“hydrotherapy” OR “aquatic therapy” OR “water-based exercise”) AND (“gait” OR “walking” OR “functional performance”). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the last 10 years involving patients with KOA undergoing aquatic therapy were included. Primary outcomes included functional performance assessed by measures such as the 6 min walking test (6MWT), the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, the five sit-to-stand (5 STS) and stair climb (SC) tests, and by using gait-related parameters (e.g., speed, cadence, and step length) assessed clinically or using technology. Patient-reported outcomes, including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster University’s Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), were analyzed as a secondary objective. Results: A total of 479 studies were identified, of which 13 met the eligibility criteria. The results revealed improvements in functional performance, with increases in 6MWT in five studies, the TUG test in four trials, and better performance in the 5-STS and SC tests in five studies. Benefits in gait parameters were noted in four studies. Additionally, one of the articles reported improvements in static and dynamic balance, another showed enhanced proprioception, and a third described more efficient muscle activation during gait following hydrotherapy. Consistent benefits in pain reduction, joint stiffness, and activities of daily living, as reflected by VAS, WOMAC, and KOOS, were also noted immediately and maintained at follow-up. The variability in outcome measures and intervention characteristics limited the possibility of data integration and the calculation of effect sizes. Conclusions: Hydrotherapy as a rehabilitation intervention may be associated with improvements in functional capacity, mobility, and self-reported physical ability in patients with KOA, with some evidence supporting a beneficial effect on gait; however, the certainty of evidence remains low to moderate due to heterogeneity among studies and limited sample sizes. These findings should be interpreted in light of the methodological limitations identified across the included trials.
Open AccessHydrotherapy in the Rehabilitation of Functional Performance and Gait in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background and Objectives: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a degenerative joint disease that affects quality of life through pain, impaired functional performance, and altered gait patterns. Hydrotherapy is a well-tolerated form of physical rehabilitation, especially suitable for patients with severe pain, as water’s properties support movement while reducing joint load. Its effects have been widely studied, primarily focusing on patient-reported outcomes, with limited synthesis of functional performance and gait-related outcomes. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, PEDro, SpringerLink, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search strategy included a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords. For example, the PubMed search strategy was as follows: (“knee osteoarthritis” OR “knee OA”) AND (“hydrotherapy” OR “aquatic therapy” OR “water-based exercise”) AND (“gait” OR “walking” OR “functional performance”). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the last 10 years involving patients with KOA undergoing aquatic therapy were included. Primary outcomes included functional performance assessed by measures such as the 6 min walking test (6MWT), the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, the five sit-to-stand (5 STS) and stair climb (SC) tests, and by using gait-related parameters (e.g., speed, cadence, and step length) assessed clinically or using technology. Patient-reported outcomes, including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster University’s Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), were analyzed as a secondary objective. Results: A total of 479 studies were identified, of which 13 met the eligibility criteria. The results revealed improvements in functional performance, with increases in 6MWT in five studies, the TUG test in four trials, and better performance in the 5-STS and SC tests in five studies. Benefits in gait parameters were noted in four studies. Additionally, one of the articles reported improvements in static and dynamic balance, another showed enhanced proprioception, and a third described more efficient muscle activation during gait following hydrotherapy. Consistent benefits in pain reduction, joint stiffness, and activities of daily living, as reflected by VAS, WOMAC, and KOOS, were also noted immediately and maintained at follow-up. The variability in outcome measures and intervention characteristics limited the possibility of data integration and the calculation of effect sizes. Conclusions: Hydrotherapy as a rehabilitation intervention may be associated with improvements in functional capacity, mobility, and self-reported physical ability in patients with KOA, with some evidence supporting a beneficial effect on gait; however, the certainty of evidence remains low to moderate due to heterogeneity among studies and limited sample sizes. These findings should be interpreted in light of the methodological limitations identified across the included trials.
- Open Access
Prolotherapy as a Regenerative Treatment in the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review
Background: Chronic low back pain markedly impairs quality of life and imposes a significant economic burden on public health. The complex pathophysiology of chronic low back pain arises from the complex anatomical configuration of the lumbar region, which includes a diverse array of structures. Consequently, etiologies may involve intervertebral disc degeneration, facet joint osteoarthritis, spinal stenosis, spondylosis, and spondylolisthesis. Therapeutic interventions for chronic low back pain are equally varied, ranging from pharmacological treatments to physiotherapy, kinetotherapy, balneotherapy, and image-guided local injectable procedures such as prolotherapy. Prolotherapy is a regenerative injection technique designed to stimulate the body’s healing processes by applying a regenerative treatment (typically dextrose), which aims to modulate neurogenic inflammation and diminish nociceptive signaling. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed in alignment with the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Studies published within the last ten years evaluating the effects of prolotherapy on pain reduction in individuals with chronic low back pain were included, following a search across six databases. Results: The review revealed several studies evaluating the influence of prolotherapy on pain in chronic low back pain patients. Findings were heterogeneous, with some studies indicating significant pain reduction and others showing minimal or no improvement. Conclusions: The current evidence regarding the efficacy of prolotherapy for pain relief in chronic low back pain remains inconclusive, highlighting the necessity for further in-depth research. Continued and updated investigations into prolotherapy’s role are imperative for enhancing the quality of life of affected patients.
Open AccessProlotherapy as a Regenerative Treatment in the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review
Background: Chronic low back pain markedly impairs quality of life and imposes a significant economic burden on public health. The complex pathophysiology of chronic low back pain arises from the complex anatomical configuration of the lumbar region, which includes a diverse array of structures. Consequently, etiologies may involve intervertebral disc degeneration, facet joint osteoarthritis, spinal stenosis, spondylosis, and spondylolisthesis. Therapeutic interventions for chronic low back pain are equally varied, ranging from pharmacological treatments to physiotherapy, kinetotherapy, balneotherapy, and image-guided local injectable procedures such as prolotherapy. Prolotherapy is a regenerative injection technique designed to stimulate the body’s healing processes by applying a regenerative treatment (typically dextrose), which aims to modulate neurogenic inflammation and diminish nociceptive signaling. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed in alignment with the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Studies published within the last ten years evaluating the effects of prolotherapy on pain reduction in individuals with chronic low back pain were included, following a search across six databases. Results: The review revealed several studies evaluating the influence of prolotherapy on pain in chronic low back pain patients. Findings were heterogeneous, with some studies indicating significant pain reduction and others showing minimal or no improvement. Conclusions: The current evidence regarding the efficacy of prolotherapy for pain relief in chronic low back pain remains inconclusive, highlighting the necessity for further in-depth research. Continued and updated investigations into prolotherapy’s role are imperative for enhancing the quality of life of affected patients.
- Open Access
Exploring the Connections Between Grip Strength, Nutritional Status, Frailty, Depression, and Cognition as Initial Assessment Tools in Geriatric Rehabilitation—A Pilot Study
Background and Objective: In the context of the rapidly aging global population, the older adult vulnerability poses a significant challenge for public health systems. Frailty, cognitive and nutritional status, depression, and grip strength are essential parameters for staging the vulnerability of older adults. The objective of this study is to identify a rapid but multidimensional geriatric assessment tool that can enhance the rehabilitation process for older adults, tailored to their specific needs. Materials and Methods: This pilot study examines the relationships between grip strength, nutritional status, frailty, depression, and cognition in a group of 80 older adults with a mean age of 69.6 years, 49 male and 31 female, using standardized geriatric scales and digital grip strength measurements. The study employed a digital dynamometer, a portable and reliable tool that facilitated quick and accurate grip strength measurements. Results: The analysis revealed significant correlations among the parameters. Greater grip strength was associated with better cognitive performance (r = 0.237, p = 0.034) and improved nutritional status (r = 0.267, p = 0.016), while it was inversely related to frailty (r = −0.313, p = 0.005). Nutritional status also played a key role, showing an inverse relationship with frailty (r = −0.333, p = 0.003) and depression levels (r = −0.248, p = 0.027). Furthermore, frailty and depression were strongly interconnected, with those experiencing higher frailty levels also displaying more severe depressive symptoms (r = 0.545, p < 0.001). Marital status was also relevant: married participants exhibited higher grip strength, lower frailty, and fewer depressive symptoms, suggesting that social support positively influences both physical and mental health in older adults. Conclusions: These findings not only emphasize the need for integrated care approaches that simultaneously address physical health, nutrition, and cognitive function, but also provide a foundation for the development of a rapid and multidimensional assessment protocol, which consists of using a digital dynamometer and four geriatric scales. Such a tool could play a crucial role in the early detection of frailty syndrome and guide the implementation of multidisciplinary, tailored therapeutic strategies aimed at preserving the autonomy and improving the quality of life of older adults.
Open AccessExploring the Connections Between Grip Strength, Nutritional Status, Frailty, Depression, and Cognition as Initial Assessment Tools in Geriatric Rehabilitation—A Pilot Study
Background and Objective: In the context of the rapidly aging global population, the older adult vulnerability poses a significant challenge for public health systems. Frailty, cognitive and nutritional status, depression, and grip strength are essential parameters for staging the vulnerability of older adults. The objective of this study is to identify a rapid but multidimensional geriatric assessment tool that can enhance the rehabilitation process for older adults, tailored to their specific needs. Materials and Methods: This pilot study examines the relationships between grip strength, nutritional status, frailty, depression, and cognition in a group of 80 older adults with a mean age of 69.6 years, 49 male and 31 female, using standardized geriatric scales and digital grip strength measurements. The study employed a digital dynamometer, a portable and reliable tool that facilitated quick and accurate grip strength measurements. Results: The analysis revealed significant correlations among the parameters. Greater grip strength was associated with better cognitive performance (r = 0.237, p = 0.034) and improved nutritional status (r = 0.267, p = 0.016), while it was inversely related to frailty (r = −0.313, p = 0.005). Nutritional status also played a key role, showing an inverse relationship with frailty (r = −0.333, p = 0.003) and depression levels (r = −0.248, p = 0.027). Furthermore, frailty and depression were strongly interconnected, with those experiencing higher frailty levels also displaying more severe depressive symptoms (r = 0.545, p < 0.001). Marital status was also relevant: married participants exhibited higher grip strength, lower frailty, and fewer depressive symptoms, suggesting that social support positively influences both physical and mental health in older adults. Conclusions: These findings not only emphasize the need for integrated care approaches that simultaneously address physical health, nutrition, and cognitive function, but also provide a foundation for the development of a rapid and multidimensional assessment protocol, which consists of using a digital dynamometer and four geriatric scales. Such a tool could play a crucial role in the early detection of frailty syndrome and guide the implementation of multidisciplinary, tailored therapeutic strategies aimed at preserving the autonomy and improving the quality of life of older adults.
- Open Access
- 26 September 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Clinics and Practice
- Vol. 14 (5) , 1997-2012
Current Evidence on and Clinical Implications of Vitamin D Levels in Pain and Functional Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review
Background: Osteoarthritis is a common chronic disease that affects quality of life and increases public health costs. Knee osteoarthritis is a frequent form, marked by joint degeneration, pain, stiffness, and functional restrictions. Factors such as age, genetics, joint injuries, obesity, and vitamin D deficiency can affect knee osteoarthritis progression. While the exact link between vitamin D and osteoarthritis is still being studied, recent research indicates that low vitamin D levels might influence the articular cartilage’s structure and function, potentially accelerating osteoarthritis. This review aims to analyze the last decade of research on vitamin D’s role in osteoarthritis. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Relevant studies from the last ten years were included to evaluate the association between vitamin D levels and knee osteoarthritis. The inclusion criteria were studies examining the role of vitamin D in cartilage health and osteoarthritis progression and the potential clinical implications for disease management. Results: This review identified a variety of studies exploring the connection between vitamin D and osteoarthritis, with mixed findings. Conclusions: The relationship between vitamin D and knee osteoarthritis remains inconclusive, highlighting the need for further research. An updated evaluation of the literature is crucial for osteoarthritis management strategies and to potentially include vitamin D supplementation in therapeutic protocols.
- 26 September 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Clinics and Practice
- Vol. 14 (5) , 1997-2012
Open AccessCurrent Evidence on and Clinical Implications of Vitamin D Levels in Pain and Functional Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review
Background: Osteoarthritis is a common chronic disease that affects quality of life and increases public health costs. Knee osteoarthritis is a frequent form, marked by joint degeneration, pain, stiffness, and functional restrictions. Factors such as age, genetics, joint injuries, obesity, and vitamin D deficiency can affect knee osteoarthritis progression. While the exact link between vitamin D and osteoarthritis is still being studied, recent research indicates that low vitamin D levels might influence the articular cartilage’s structure and function, potentially accelerating osteoarthritis. This review aims to analyze the last decade of research on vitamin D’s role in osteoarthritis. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Relevant studies from the last ten years were included to evaluate the association between vitamin D levels and knee osteoarthritis. The inclusion criteria were studies examining the role of vitamin D in cartilage health and osteoarthritis progression and the potential clinical implications for disease management. Results: This review identified a variety of studies exploring the connection between vitamin D and osteoarthritis, with mixed findings. Conclusions: The relationship between vitamin D and knee osteoarthritis remains inconclusive, highlighting the need for further research. An updated evaluation of the literature is crucial for osteoarthritis management strategies and to potentially include vitamin D supplementation in therapeutic protocols.