Haolin Shen
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Haolin Shen has a total of 39 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alexander Marson
University of California, San Francisco 1 Department of Medicine San Francisco, California
1 shared publication - Anika Wadhera
Gladstone-UCSF Institute of Genomic Immunology, San Francisco, USA
1 shared publication - Ansuman T. Satpathy
Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, USA
1 shared publication - Brian Rudolph Shy
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA 94143; Gladstone-UCSF Institute of Genomic Immunology, San Francisco, CA USA 94158
1 shared publication - Danielle L. Swaney
University of California, San Francisco
1 shared publication - Dmytro Dorovskyi
Gladstone-UCSF Institute of Genomic Immunology, San Francisco, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 10 November 2025
- Published by Rockefeller University Press in Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Vol. 223 (1)
Splenic cDC1 efferocytosis and cross-presentation to CD8 T cells are promoted by GPR34 and lysophosphatidylserine
Spleen conventional dendritic cells type 1 (cDC1) take up apoptotic cells (AC) and cross-present associated antigens to CD8 T cells. The receptors promoting AC uptake are incompletely defined. Here, we tested the function of GPR34, a receptor that responds to the phosphatidylserine (PS) catabolite lysoPS. GPR34 deficiency led to reduced AC uptake by cDC1 but not cDC2 or macrophages. Uptake of soluble antigen or heat-killed bacteria was unaffected, whereas uptake of eryptotic RBCs was reduced. Using AC harboring OVA, activation and proliferation of OT-I T cells were compromised in GPR34-deficient mice. Reciprocally, GPR34 overexpression led to enhanced AC uptake and OT-I proliferation. The enzymes PLA1A and ABHD16A have been implicated in generating lysoPS that can act on GPR34. PLA1A but not ABHD16A deficiency was associated with a reduced OT-I response to AC-associated OVA. In conclusion, we identify a receptor requirement for cDC1 efferocytosis and cross-presentation and suggest a model where PLA1A catabolizes PS on AC to generate GPR34 ligands.
- 10 November 2025
- Published by Rockefeller University Press in Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Vol. 223 (1)
Open AccessSplenic cDC1 efferocytosis and cross-presentation to CD8 T cells are promoted by GPR34 and lysophosphatidylserine
Spleen conventional dendritic cells type 1 (cDC1) take up apoptotic cells (AC) and cross-present associated antigens to CD8 T cells. The receptors promoting AC uptake are incompletely defined. Here, we tested the function of GPR34, a receptor that responds to the phosphatidylserine (PS) catabolite lysoPS. GPR34 deficiency led to reduced AC uptake by cDC1 but not cDC2 or macrophages. Uptake of soluble antigen or heat-killed bacteria was unaffected, whereas uptake of eryptotic RBCs was reduced. Using AC harboring OVA, activation and proliferation of OT-I T cells were compromised in GPR34-deficient mice. Reciprocally, GPR34 overexpression led to enhanced AC uptake and OT-I proliferation. The enzymes PLA1A and ABHD16A have been implicated in generating lysoPS that can act on GPR34. PLA1A but not ABHD16A deficiency was associated with a reduced OT-I response to AC-associated OVA. In conclusion, we identify a receptor requirement for cDC1 efferocytosis and cross-presentation and suggest a model where PLA1A catabolizes PS on AC to generate GPR34 ligands.
- Open Access
- 11 December 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 637 (8047) , 930-939
Central control of dynamic gene circuits governs T cell rest and activation
The ability of cells to maintain distinct identities and respond to transient environmental signals requires tightly controlled regulation of gene networks1–3. These dynamic regulatory circuits that respond to extracellular cues in primary human cells remain poorly defined. The need for context-dependent regulation is prominent in T cells, where distinct lineages must respond to diverse signals to mount effective immune responses and maintain homeostasis4–8. Here we performed CRISPR screens in multiple primary human CD4+ T cell contexts to identify regulators that control expression of IL-2Rα, a canonical marker of T cell activation transiently expressed by pro-inflammatory effector T cells and constitutively expressed by anti-inflammatory regulatory T cells where it is required for fitness9–11. Approximately 90% of identified regulators of IL-2Rα had effects that varied across cell types and/or stimulation states, including a subset that even had opposite effects across conditions. Using single-cell transcriptomics after pooled perturbation of context-specific screen hits, we characterized specific factors as regulators of overall rest or activation and constructed state-specific regulatory networks. MED12 — a component of the Mediator complex — serves as a dynamic orchestrator of key regulators, controlling expression of distinct sets of regulators in different T cell contexts. Immunoprecipitation–mass spectrometry revealed that MED12 interacts with the histone methylating COMPASS complex. MED12 was required for histone methylation and expression of genes encoding key context-specific regulators, including the rest maintenance factor KLF2 and the versatile regulator MYC. CRISPR ablation of MED12 blunted the cell-state transitions between rest and activation and protected from activation-induced cell death. Overall, this work leverages CRISPR screens performed across conditions to define dynamic gene circuits required to establish resting and activated T cell states.
- 11 December 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 637 (8047) , 930-939
Open AccessCentral control of dynamic gene circuits governs T cell rest and activation
The ability of cells to maintain distinct identities and respond to transient environmental signals requires tightly controlled regulation of gene networks1–3. These dynamic regulatory circuits that respond to extracellular cues in primary human cells remain poorly defined. The need for context-dependent regulation is prominent in T cells, where distinct lineages must respond to diverse signals to mount effective immune responses and maintain homeostasis4–8. Here we performed CRISPR screens in multiple primary human CD4+ T cell contexts to identify regulators that control expression of IL-2Rα, a canonical marker of T cell activation transiently expressed by pro-inflammatory effector T cells and constitutively expressed by anti-inflammatory regulatory T cells where it is required for fitness9–11. Approximately 90% of identified regulators of IL-2Rα had effects that varied across cell types and/or stimulation states, including a subset that even had opposite effects across conditions. Using single-cell transcriptomics after pooled perturbation of context-specific screen hits, we characterized specific factors as regulators of overall rest or activation and constructed state-specific regulatory networks. MED12 — a component of the Mediator complex — serves as a dynamic orchestrator of key regulators, controlling expression of distinct sets of regulators in different T cell contexts. Immunoprecipitation–mass spectrometry revealed that MED12 interacts with the histone methylating COMPASS complex. MED12 was required for histone methylation and expression of genes encoding key context-specific regulators, including the rest maintenance factor KLF2 and the versatile regulator MYC. CRISPR ablation of MED12 blunted the cell-state transitions between rest and activation and protected from activation-induced cell death. Overall, this work leverages CRISPR screens performed across conditions to define dynamic gene circuits required to establish resting and activated T cell states.
- 7 October 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Immunology
- Vol. 25 (11) , 2043-2056
Optimization of the Irf8 +32-kb enhancer disrupts dendritic cell lineage segregation
Autoactivation of lineage-determining transcription factors mediates bistable expression, generating distinct cell phenotypes essential for complex body plans. Classical type 1 dendritic cell (cDC1) and type 2 dendritic cell (cDC2) subsets provide nonredundant functions for defense against distinct immune challenges. Interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8), the cDC1 lineage-determining transcription factor, undergoes autoactivation in cDC1 progenitors to establish cDC1 identity, yet its expression is downregulated during cDC2 differentiation by an unknown mechanism. This study reveals that the Irf8 +32-kb enhancer, responsible for IRF8 autoactivation, is naturally suboptimized with low-affinity IRF8 binding sites. Introducing multiple high-affinity IRF8 sites into the Irf8 +32-kb enhancer causes a gain-of-function effect, leading to erroneous IRF8 autoactivation in specified cDC2 progenitors, redirecting them toward cDC1 and a novel hybrid DC subset with mixed-lineage phenotypes. Further, this also causes a loss-of-function effect, reducing Irf8 expression in cDC1s. These developmental alterations critically impair both cDC1-dependent and cDC2-dependent arms of immunity. Collectively, our findings underscore the significance of enhancer suboptimization in the developmental segregation of cDCs required for normal immune function.
- 7 October 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Immunology
- Vol. 25 (11) , 2043-2056
Optimization of the Irf8 +32-kb enhancer disrupts dendritic cell lineage segregation
Autoactivation of lineage-determining transcription factors mediates bistable expression, generating distinct cell phenotypes essential for complex body plans. Classical type 1 dendritic cell (cDC1) and type 2 dendritic cell (cDC2) subsets provide nonredundant functions for defense against distinct immune challenges. Interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8), the cDC1 lineage-determining transcription factor, undergoes autoactivation in cDC1 progenitors to establish cDC1 identity, yet its expression is downregulated during cDC2 differentiation by an unknown mechanism. This study reveals that the Irf8 +32-kb enhancer, responsible for IRF8 autoactivation, is naturally suboptimized with low-affinity IRF8 binding sites. Introducing multiple high-affinity IRF8 sites into the Irf8 +32-kb enhancer causes a gain-of-function effect, leading to erroneous IRF8 autoactivation in specified cDC2 progenitors, redirecting them toward cDC1 and a novel hybrid DC subset with mixed-lineage phenotypes. Further, this also causes a loss-of-function effect, reducing Irf8 expression in cDC1s. These developmental alterations critically impair both cDC1-dependent and cDC2-dependent arms of immunity. Collectively, our findings underscore the significance of enhancer suboptimization in the developmental segregation of cDCs required for normal immune function.