Kimberly Glover
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Kimberly Glover has a total of 31 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Amanda Gauld
Diabetes Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Clinic, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
1 shared publicationBruce Neal
The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
1 shared publicationClaudia Nau
Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Department of Research and Evaluation, Pasadena, CA, United States of America; Kaiser Permanente J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, United States of America
1 shared publication- Daisy Hannah Coyle
The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia
1 shared publication Dariush Mozaffarian
Food is Medicine Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States of America
1 shared publicationDavid Simmons
School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia; Macarthur Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism Service, Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 15 April 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Vol. 153, 107915
Produce prescription to improve health among adults with type 2 diabetes in Australia: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- 15 April 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Vol. 153, 107915
Produce prescription to improve health among adults with type 2 diabetes in Australia: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- Open Access
- 8 October 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 21 (10) , 1330
Stakeholder Perspectives on the Acceptability, Design, and Integration of Produce Prescriptions for People with Type 2 Diabetes in Australia: A Formative Study
Produce prescription programs can benefit both individuals and health systems; however, best practices for integrating such programs into the Australian health system are yet unknown. This study explored stakeholders’ perspectives on the acceptability, potential design and integration of produce prescription programs for adults with type 2 diabetes in Australia. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 22 participants for an online workshop, representing six stakeholder groups (government, healthcare service, clinician, food retailer, consumer, non-government organisation). Participant responses were gathered through workshop discussions and a virtual collaboration tool (Mural). The workshop was video-recorded and transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis was conducted using a deductive–inductive approach. Stakeholders recognised produce prescription as an acceptable intervention; however, they identified challenges to implementation related to contextuality, accessibility, and sustainability. Stakeholders were vocal about the approach (e.g., community-led) and infrastructure (e.g., screening tools) needed to support program design and implementation but expressed diverse views about potential funding models, indicating a need for further investigation. Aligning evaluation outcomes with existing measures in local, State and Federal initiatives was recommended, and entry points for integration were identified within and outside of the Australian health sector. Our findings provide clear considerations for future produce prescription interventions for people with type 2 diabetes.
- 8 October 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 21 (10) , 1330
Open AccessStakeholder Perspectives on the Acceptability, Design, and Integration of Produce Prescriptions for People with Type 2 Diabetes in Australia: A Formative Study
Produce prescription programs can benefit both individuals and health systems; however, best practices for integrating such programs into the Australian health system are yet unknown. This study explored stakeholders’ perspectives on the acceptability, potential design and integration of produce prescription programs for adults with type 2 diabetes in Australia. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 22 participants for an online workshop, representing six stakeholder groups (government, healthcare service, clinician, food retailer, consumer, non-government organisation). Participant responses were gathered through workshop discussions and a virtual collaboration tool (Mural). The workshop was video-recorded and transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis was conducted using a deductive–inductive approach. Stakeholders recognised produce prescription as an acceptable intervention; however, they identified challenges to implementation related to contextuality, accessibility, and sustainability. Stakeholders were vocal about the approach (e.g., community-led) and infrastructure (e.g., screening tools) needed to support program design and implementation but expressed diverse views about potential funding models, indicating a need for further investigation. Aligning evaluation outcomes with existing measures in local, State and Federal initiatives was recommended, and entry points for integration were identified within and outside of the Australian health sector. Our findings provide clear considerations for future produce prescription interventions for people with type 2 diabetes.