Viktor Szabó

Viktor Szabó

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Viktor Szabó has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    Deep Learning-Based Periapical Lesion Detection on Panoramic Radiographs

    by Viktor Szabó, Kaan Orhan, Csaba Dobó-Nagy, Dániel Sándor Veres, David Manulis, Matvey Ezhov, Alex Sanders, Bence Tamás Szabó

    Background/Objectives: Our study aimed to determine the accuracy of the artificial intelligence-based Diagnocat system (DC) in detecting periapical lesions (PL) on panoramic radiographs (PRs). Methods: 616 teeth were selected from 357 panoramic radiographs, including 308 teeth with clearly visible periapical radiolucency and 308 without any periapical lesion. Three groups were generated: teeth with radiographic signs of caries (Group 1), teeth with coronal restoration (Group 2), and teeth with root canal filling (Group 3). The PRs were uploaded to the Diagnocat system for evaluation. The performance of the convolutional neural network in detecting PLs was assessed by its sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, as well as the diagnostic accuracy value. We investigated the possible effect of the palatoglossal air space (PGAS) on the evaluation of the AI tool. Results: DC identified periapical lesions in 240 (77.9%) cases out of the 308 teeth with PL and detected no PL in 68 (22.1%) teeth with PL. The AI-based system detected no PL in any of the groups without PL. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of DC were 0.78, 1.00, and 0.89, respectively. Considering these parameters for each group, Group 2 showed the highest values at 0.84, 1.00, and 0.95, respectively. Fisher’s Exact test showed that PGAS does not significantly affect (p = 1) the detection of PL in the upper teeth. The AI-based system showed lower probability values for detecting PL in the case of central incisors, wisdom teeth, and canines. The sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of DC for detecting PL on canines showed lower values at 0.27 and 0.64, respectively. Conclusions: The CNN-based Diagnocat system can support the diagnosis of PL on PRs and serves as a decision-support tool during radiographic assessments.


  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    Validation of artificial intelligence application for dental caries diagnosis on intraoral bitewing and periapical radiographs

    by Viktor Szabó, Bence Tamás Szabó, Kaan Orhan, Dániel Sándor Veres, David Manulis, Matvey Ezhov, Alex Sanders