Charlotte Aaquist Haslund
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Charlotte Aaquist Haslund has a total of 121 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Maj K. Kjeldsen
Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Genomic Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, NSGO-CTU
14 shared publications - Maria Rossing
Center for Genomic Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
14 shared publications - Sakari Hietanen
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
14 shared publications - Anja Oer Knudsen
Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
13 shared publications - Anne Krejbjerg Motavaf
Department of Oncology, Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
13 shared publications - Dina Sofie B. Grønseth
Center for Genomic Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
13 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 26 March 2026
- Published by Elsevier in ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology
- Vol. 12, 100691
The role of socioeconomic position in use of systemic anticancer therapy
- 26 March 2026
- Published by Elsevier in ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology
- Vol. 12, 100691
Open AccessThe role of socioeconomic position in use of systemic anticancer therapy
- Open Access
- 19 March 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Translational Oncology
- Vol. 67, 102740
Exploring survival-associated transcriptomic subtypes in ovarian cancer using RNAseq from FFPE tissues in a clinical trial cohort
- 19 March 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Translational Oncology
- Vol. 67, 102740
Open AccessExploring survival-associated transcriptomic subtypes in ovarian cancer using RNAseq from FFPE tissues in a clinical trial cohort
- Open Access
- 13 May 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
SupplementaryGeneTable S1 from Beyond HRD Status: Unraveling Genetic Variants Impacting PARP Inhibitor Sensitivity in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
All identified pathogenic variants in the samples analyzed.
- 13 May 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementaryGeneTable S1 from Beyond HRD Status: Unraveling Genetic Variants Impacting PARP Inhibitor Sensitivity in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
All identified pathogenic variants in the samples analyzed.
- Open Access
- 3 April 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
SupplementaryGeneTable S1 from Beyond HRD Status: Unraveling Genetic Variants Impacting PARP Inhibitor Sensitivity in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
All identified pathogenic variants in the samples analyzed.
- 3 April 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementaryGeneTable S1 from Beyond HRD Status: Unraveling Genetic Variants Impacting PARP Inhibitor Sensitivity in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
All identified pathogenic variants in the samples analyzed.
- Open Access
- 6 March 2025
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 220, 115339
Immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic or non-resectable melanoma after failure of adjuvant anti-PD-1 treatment. A EUMelaReg real-world evidence study
- 6 March 2025
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 220, 115339
Open AccessImmune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic or non-resectable melanoma after failure of adjuvant anti-PD-1 treatment. A EUMelaReg real-world evidence study
- Open Access
- 6 January 2025
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Neuro-Oncology Advances
- Vol. 7 (1)
Dose-enhanced versus standard TTFields for first recurrence of glioblastoma: A randomized phase 2 clinical trial
BackgroundStudies suggest that high intensities of tumor treating fields (TTFields) correlate with prolonged survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. However, no randomized clinical studies have tested different doses of TTFields, and the treatment remains controversial for recurrent glioblastoma. This study examined the clinical efficacy of dose-enhanced TTFields in first recurrence glioblastoma (rGBM). Methods: This open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted nationwide in Denmark (2020-2024) with planned enrollment of 84 rGBM patients. Inclusion criteria were focal disease, KPS ≥ 70, and eligibility for resection. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive standard or dose-enhanced TTFields in addition to standard-of-care. Dose enhancement (25%-70%) in the tumor was achieved by placing five small cranial burr holes over the tumor bed with overlapping TTFields transducer arrays. The primary outcome was the overall survival (OS) rate at 12 months (OS12). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival, toxicity, steroid use, objective response rate (ORR), and quality of life. Results: We enrolled 58 participants with a mean (SD) age of 59.2 (11.1) years and a median (IQR) KPS of 90 (10). Preplanned interim analysis of the first 52 patients resulted in early trial termination due to futility. Intent-to-treat analysis of the complete cohort showed an OS12 of 56% vs 46% (P = .38) and a median OS of 12.3 vs 11.1 months (P = .93) for intervention and control, respectively. Differences in the secondary outcomes were insignificant. Conclusion: Dose-enhanced TTFields utilizing burr holes over the resection cavity were not associated with improved survival in rGBM, with low study power as the primary limitation.
- 6 January 2025
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Neuro-Oncology Advances
- Vol. 7 (1)
Open AccessDose-enhanced versus standard TTFields for first recurrence of glioblastoma: A randomized phase 2 clinical trial
BackgroundStudies suggest that high intensities of tumor treating fields (TTFields) correlate with prolonged survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. However, no randomized clinical studies have tested different doses of TTFields, and the treatment remains controversial for recurrent glioblastoma. This study examined the clinical efficacy of dose-enhanced TTFields in first recurrence glioblastoma (rGBM). Methods: This open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted nationwide in Denmark (2020-2024) with planned enrollment of 84 rGBM patients. Inclusion criteria were focal disease, KPS ≥ 70, and eligibility for resection. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive standard or dose-enhanced TTFields in addition to standard-of-care. Dose enhancement (25%-70%) in the tumor was achieved by placing five small cranial burr holes over the tumor bed with overlapping TTFields transducer arrays. The primary outcome was the overall survival (OS) rate at 12 months (OS12). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival, toxicity, steroid use, objective response rate (ORR), and quality of life. Results: We enrolled 58 participants with a mean (SD) age of 59.2 (11.1) years and a median (IQR) KPS of 90 (10). Preplanned interim analysis of the first 52 patients resulted in early trial termination due to futility. Intent-to-treat analysis of the complete cohort showed an OS12 of 56% vs 46% (P = .38) and a median OS of 12.3 vs 11.1 months (P = .93) for intervention and control, respectively. Differences in the secondary outcomes were insignificant. Conclusion: Dose-enhanced TTFields utilizing burr holes over the resection cavity were not associated with improved survival in rGBM, with low study power as the primary limitation.
- Open Access
- 26 December 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure 2 from Beyond HRD Status: Unraveling Genetic Variants Impacting PARP Inhibitor Sensitivity in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
Oncoplot showing pathogenic gene alterations. The plot is split into groups by cellular pathways affected by the alteration on the vertical axis and clinical outcome (clinical benefit: PFS ≥12 months, no benefit: PFS ≤6 months) on the horizontal axis. Each column represents one patient. In total, 81 patient samples. See color guide reflecting specific alterations below the plot. # = Reason of “end of treatment” other than progressive disease. Integer “HRD-status and GIS” = the exact GIS reported by MyChoice.
- 26 December 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure 2 from Beyond HRD Status: Unraveling Genetic Variants Impacting PARP Inhibitor Sensitivity in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
Oncoplot showing pathogenic gene alterations. The plot is split into groups by cellular pathways affected by the alteration on the vertical axis and clinical outcome (clinical benefit: PFS ≥12 months, no benefit: PFS ≤6 months) on the horizontal axis. Each column represents one patient. In total, 81 patient samples. See color guide reflecting specific alterations below the plot. # = Reason of “end of treatment” other than progressive disease. Integer “HRD-status and GIS” = the exact GIS reported by MyChoice.
- Open Access
- 26 December 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure 1 from Beyond HRD Status: Unraveling Genetic Variants Impacting PARP Inhibitor Sensitivity in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
Flowchart showing patients included in final gene panel analysis. * Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded. ** TSO500 gene panel by Illumina.
- 26 December 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure 1 from Beyond HRD Status: Unraveling Genetic Variants Impacting PARP Inhibitor Sensitivity in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
Flowchart showing patients included in final gene panel analysis. * Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded. ** TSO500 gene panel by Illumina.