José Ángel Hernández-Mariano

Introducción: La salud mental infantil es fundamental para el desarrollo integral de los niños, pero factores estresores en el día a día, como problemas en salud, escuela y familia, pueden alterar su bienestar psicológico. La exposición constante a estos estresores, sumada al uso de estrategias de afrontamiento inadecuadas, puede agravar dificultades emocionales y modificar su capacidad de adaptación. Objetivo: El presente estudio tuvo como finalidad identificar los principales estresores cotidianos que enfrentan niños escolares mexicanos y analizar las estrategias de afrontamiento que emplean. Metodología: Se realizó un estudio transversal en 297 niños de 9 a 12 años, seleccionados mediante muestreo no probabilístico en instituciones del municipio de Hidalgo, México. Se emplearon el Inventario Infantil de Estresores Cotidianos (IIEC) y la Escala de Afrontamiento para Niños (EAN) para recopilar datos. El análisis estadístico incluyó frecuencias, pruebas chi-cuadrado y modelos de regresión logística para determinar asociaciones. Resultados: Más de la mitad de los niños (53.9%) reportaron estresores en salud, escuela y familia. La mayoría utilizaba estrategias improductivas, como evitación y conductas agresivas. La presencia de estresores aumentaba significativamente la posibilidad de emplear estrategias ineficaces, con un riesgo relevante de sufrimiento emocional y dificultades de adaptación. Conclusión: Los estresores cotidianos en ámbitos clave se asocian con un mayor uso de estrategias de afrontamiento inadecuadas en niños. El fortalecimiento de recursos de afrontamiento en la infancia es esencial para promover su salud mental y bienestar psicológico.

Background/Objectives: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are globally recognized as a high-risk group for tuberculosis (TB) infection. However, limited data exist on the prevalence of latent TB infection (LTBI) and associated occupational risk factors in the Mexican context. Identifying the burden of LTBI is essential for effective prevention. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of LTBI among HCWs in a tertiary care hospital in Mexico and to explore associated risk factors. Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 300 HCWs (including physicians, nurses, and stretcher-bearers) at a tertiary-level hospital in Mexico. Sociodemographic and occupational data were collected through a structured questionnaire. LTBI screening was performed using the tuberculin skin test (TST), with positive results confirmed via the QuantiFERON-TB Gold assay. Associations between relevant variables and LTBI were assessed using logistic regression models, adjusted for potential confounders. Results: The prevalence of LTBI was 16.7%. After adjusting for confounders, male HCWs had significantly higher odds of LTBI compared to females (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06–3.80). Although elevated odds of LTBI were also observed among physicians, stretcher-bearers, and those with direct contact with TB patients, these associations were not statistically significant. Conclusion: LTBI represents a relevant occupational health issue among HCWs, with nearly one in six workers affected. Early detection and prevention of TB in healthcare settings are critical to protecting individual workers and public health. These findings highlight the need to strengthen occupational TB surveillance and prevention strategies in similar healthcare environments.

Previous studies suggest that nursing diagnoses (NDs) could predict clinical outcomes, such as mortality, among patients with non-communicable diseases. However, evidence in patients with COVID-19 is still scarce. Objective: To evaluate the association between NDs and COVID-19 mortality among hospitalized patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 498 paper clinical records of patients hospitalized for at least 72 h in the internal medicine unit for COVID-19 from June to December 2020. The interest association was assessed using logistic regression models. Results: NDs focused on COVID-19 pulmonary responses, such as impaired gas exchange (OR = 3.04; 95% CI = 1.87, 4.95), impaired spontaneous ventilation (OR = 3.67; 95% CI = 2.17, 6.21), or ineffective airway clearance (OR = 2.47; 95% CI = 1.48, 4.12), were significant predictors of mortality. NDs on COVID-19 extrapulmonary responses, such as risk for unstable blood glucose level (OR = 2.45; 95% CI = 1.45, 4,15), risk for impaired liver function (OR = 2.02; 95% CI = 1.11, 3.63), hyperthermia (OR = 2.08; 95% CI = 1.29, 3.35), decreased cardiac output (OR = 2.95; 95% CI = 1.42, 6.11), or risk for shock (OR = 3.03; 95% CI = 1.28, 7.13), were associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality. Conversely, patients with NDs of fear (OR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.35, 0.89) and anxiety (OR = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.26, 0.77) had a lower risk of death. Conclusions: NDs on pulmonary and extrapulmonary responses to COVID-19 were associated with in-hospital mortality, suggesting that they are indicators of the severity of these patients. Therefore, NDs may help nursing staff identify individuals who require closer monitoring and guide early interventions for their recovery.

Purpose: Previous evidence suggests that non-adherence to medication among patients with chronic diseases might negatively affect their health-related quality of life (HRQoL); however, the evidence in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is not conclusive, and information is scarce in the Mexican context. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the association between medication adherence and HRQoL among Mexican adults with T2D. Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted on a sample of 320 adults with T2D. Participants were recruited from two community health centers in Hidalgo, Mexico. The four-item Morisky Green Levine Medication Adherence Scale and the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) were used to assess medication adherence and HRQoL, respectively. The associations between the variables of interest were evaluated using logistic regression models. Results: It was found that 78.4% of the participants were non-adherent to medication. After adjusting for confounders, we observed that non-adherent adults were more likely to have poor HRQoL in six domains of SF-36: physical functioning (adjusted odds ratio [ORa] =2.02; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] =1.06, 3.80); physical role (ORa = 2.37; 95% CI = 1.13, 4.96); bodily pain (ORa = 2.71; 95% CI = 1.45, 5.06); general health (ORa = 2.57; 95% CI = 1.37, 4.80); vitality (ORa = 3.30; 95% CI = 1.70, 6.39); social functioning (ORa = 2.97; 95% CI = 1.56, 5.65); and mental health (ORa = 2.66; 95% CI = 1.42, 4.98). Conclusion: Non-adherence to medication was independently associated with HRQoL in Mexican adults with T2D. Therefore, it is necessary to plan awareness interventions to encourage adherence to therapeutic recommendations during routine clinical consultations in primary care.