Gizem Yildirim

Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard treatment for relapsed or high-risk lymphoma. While disease-related factors are well-known, the impact of host-related factors like nutritional status remains less defined. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and other factors in lymphoma patients undergoing ASCT. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study including adult patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma who underwent ASCT between January 2015 and December 2023. Pre-transplant clinical, laboratory, and transplant-related variables were analyzed. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was calculated using serum albumin and absolute lymphocyte count and dichotomized according to the cohort median. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses. We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study including adult patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma who underwent ASCT between January 2015 and December 2023. Results: A total of 43 patients were included. Median age was 38 years, and 72.1% were male. Patients transplanted in complete remission (CR) had significantly longer PFS compared with those transplanted in partial remission (PR) (log-rank p = 0.022). Patients with higher pre-ASCT PNI demonstrated significantly improved PFS (median 45 vs. 7 months; log-rank p = 0.021). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, both higher PNI (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.16–0.97; p = 0.043) and complete remission prior to ASCT (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.17–0.98; p = 0.046) remained independently associated with improved PFS. Higher infused CD34⁺ (hematopoietic stem cell) dose was associated with shorter hospitalization but showed no statistically significant association with engraftment kinetics or survival. No variable was independently associated with OS, likely due to the limited number of death events. Conclusions: Pre-transplant prognostic nutritional index and disease response independently predict progression-free survival after ASCT in lymphoma. These findings highlight the complementary role of host-related and disease-related factors in transplant outcomes and suggest that PNI may serve as a practical tool for pre-transplant risk stratification and patient optimization. Given the small sample size and limited number of events, these findings should be interpreted with caution.

Background/Objectives : Accurate prognostic assessment remains crucial in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), especially as treatment options have expanded beyond vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapies to include immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and ICI–TKI combinations. The widely used IMDC classification shows important limitations in the modern therapeutic era, highlighting the need for complementary prognostic tools. In this context, the Meet-URO and CANLPH scores—incorporating clinical, inflammatory, and nutritional markers—have emerged as promising alternatives. To evaluate and compare the prognostic performance of the Meet-URO and CANLPH scoring systems in a real-world mRCC cohort predominantly treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy due to limited access to ICI-based combinations. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 112 patients with mRCC. The Meet-URO score was calculated for all patients, while the CANLPH score was assessed in 56 patients with complete laboratory data. CAR, NLR, and PHR were computed using baseline pre-treatment measurements. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), the latter defined exclusively for first-line therapy, were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Correlations between inflammatory markers and survival outcomes were analyzed using Spearman’s rho. Results: Meet-URO demonstrated clear prognostic stratification across all five categories, with the most favorable outcomes in score group 2 and progressively poorer OS and PFS in higher-risk groups. CANLPH also showed meaningful survival discrimination, with the highest inflammatory group (score 3) exhibiting markedly reduced OS and PFS. CAR was the strongest individual predictor of survival, while NLR and PHR showed weaker associations. Conclusions: Both Meet-URO and CANLPH provide strong, complementary prognostic information in mRCC, even in a cohort largely treated with TKI monotherapy. Their integration into routine risk assessment may enhance clinical decision-making, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Background: Accurate prognostic assessment remains crucial in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), especially as treatment options have expanded beyond vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)–targeted therapies to include immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and ICI–TKI combinations. The widely used IMDC classification shows important limitations in the modern therapeutic era, highlighting the need for complementary prognostic tools. In this context, the Meet-URO and CANLPH scores—incorporating clinical, inflammatory, and nutritional markers have emerged as promising alternatives. Objective: To evaluate and compare the prognostic performance of the Meet-URO and CANLPH scoring systems in a real-world mRCC cohort predominantly treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy due to limited access to ICI-based combinations. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 112 patients with mRCC. The Meet-URO score was calculated for all patients, while the CANLPH score was assessed in 56 patients with complete laboratory data. CAR, NLR, and PHR were computed using baseline pre-treatment measurements. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) the latter defined exclusively for first-line therapy—were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Correlations between inflammatory markers and survival outcomes were analyzed using Spearman’s rho. Results: Meet-URO demonstrated clear prognostic stratification across all five categories, with the most favorable outcomes in score group 2 and progressively poorer OS and PFS in higher-risk groups. CANLPH also showed meaningful survival discrimination, with the highest inflammatory group (score 3) exhibiting markedly reduced OS and PFS. CAR was the strongest individual predictor of survival, while NLR and PHR showed weaker associations. Conclusion: Both Meet-URO and CANLPH provide strong, complementary prognostic information in mRCC, even in a cohort largely treated with TKI monotherapy. Their integration into routine risk assessment may enhance clinical decision-making, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Background/Objectives: Metastatic testicular germ cell tumor (mGCT) is a highly curable disease with first-line cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with metastatic testicular cancer in a nationwide multicenter cohort. Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 316 male patients diagnosed with mGCT who were treated with first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy across 10 institutions in Turkey between 2011 and 2024. Clinical and pathological data, including International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) risk classification, treatment details, and survival outcomes, were analyzed. Results: The median age of the cohort was 28 years, and 76.3% of patients were diagnosed with non-seminoma. According to IGCCCG risk stratification, 53.2% had good-risk, 25.3% intermediate-risk, and 21.5% poor-risk disease. Median follow-up was 38.4 months. Among patients with seminoma, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 100% in the good-risk group and 87.5% in the intermediate-risk group. In patients with non-seminoma, 5-year OS rates were 96.6%, 86.9%, and 65.1% in the good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk groups, respectively. Among 125 patients who received salvage treatment, high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) significantly improved survival in the International Prognostic Factors Study Group (IPFSG) very high-risk group (3-year OS: 55.0% vs. 16.3% with conventional-dose chemotherapy (CDCT), p = 0.007). Conclusions: This study provides the first large-scale nationwide dataset on mGCT outcomes in Turkey, demonstrating overall survival rates comparable to international cohorts. The findings emphasize the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, adherence to treatment guidelines, and optimal surgical interventions in improving patient outcomes.

Background and Objectives: ROS1 rearrangement is a rare but targetable alteration in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), occurring in 1–2% of cases. Crizotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials, but real-world data remain limited. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged NSCLC patients in a real-world setting. Materials and Methods: This multicenter, retrospective research included 43 individuals with advanced/metastatic NSCLC and confirmed ROS1 rearrangements. Patients were treated with crizotinib in first- or second-line settings. Efficacy endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Safety was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Results: The median follow-up was 45.8 months. The ORR for first-line crizotinib was 72.1%, with a DCR of 79%. The median PFS was 20.9 months (95% CI: 6.02–35.69), and the median OS was 52.7 months (95% CI: 13.08–92.31). ECOG performance status was a significant prognostic factor for ORR (p = 0.02). The most common adverse events were fatigue (16.2%), elevated transaminases (13.9%), and vision disorders (11.6%). All reported adverse events were grade 1 or 2, with no grade ≥ 3 events observed. Conclusions:Crizotinib demonstrated significant efficacy and a favorable safety profile in real-world individuals with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. These findings align with pivotal trials, underscoring crizotinib’s role as a standard treatment for this molecular subset. Further prospective studies are warranted to explore intracranial efficacy and long-term outcomes.

Objective: Extragonadal germ cell tumours have a more unfavourable prognosis than gonadal germ cell tumours. We aimed to evaluate the survival analysis, response rates, and factors affecting responses to high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with relapsed/refractory extragonadal germ cell tumours. Methods: This study included patients diagnosed with extragonadal germ cell tumours who underwent HDCT + ASCT between November 2016 and January 2023 at Gülhane Training and Research Hospital. Clinical characteristics and follow-up data from patient records and the hospital’s electronic system were retrospectively analysed. Patients under 18 years of age and those without medical records were excluded. Patient characteristics, post-HDCT progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) data, and factors affecting survival were examined. The relationship between clinical factors and OS/PFS was analysed. Results: Twenty-five patients were included in this study. Complete response (CR) was observed in seven patients (28%), partial response (PR) was observed in nine patients (36%), stable disease (SD) was observed in one patient, and progressive disease (PD) was observed in eight patients (32%) after HDCT + ASCT. The median follow-up period was 25.4 months. The median PFS and OS after HDCT + ASCT were calculated as 6.1 months and 12.2 months, respectively. Conclusions: Salvage HDCT + ASCT is an option in the treatment of extragonadal germ cell tumours, offering the potential for prolonged survival and curing.