Eric Gillett
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Eric Gillett has a total of 23 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jeffrey C. Pearson
Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts
4 shared publications - Brandon Dionne
Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts
3 shared publications - Alex Rock
Massachusetts General Hospital
2 shared publications - Brian T. Chan
Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts
2 shared publications - David W. Kubiak
Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts
2 shared publications Adetoun Okenla
Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 15 June 2026
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
- Vol. 6 (1)
Outcomes of early oral antibiotic transition for the treatment of uncomplicated enterococcal bacteremia
Objective: To compare clinical outcomes in adults with uncomplicated enterococcal bacteremia treated with intravenous (IV) therapy alone versus an early oral (PO) transition and evaluate treatment characteristics and safety outcomes. Design: Retrospective cohort study between January 1, 2021, and August 1, 2024. The primary outcome was clinical cure at 90 days after antibiotic completion. Secondary outcomes included treatment failure, infection-related readmission, hospital length of stay (HLOS), and 90-day mortality. Setting: Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, two tertiary care centers in Boston, MA. Patients: Adult patients with at least one positive blood culture with Enterococcus spp. Patients were excluded if they had polymicrobial or persistent bacteremia, invasive infection, incomplete source control, died before completing therapy, or received fewer than 7 days of antibiotics. Results: 209 patients were included, of which 119 received IV therapy alone and 90 underwent early PO transition. Gastrointestinal (41.6%) and genitourinary (32.1%) sources were most common, and 86 patients (41.1%) had immunocompromising conditions. Clinical cure was similar between the IV and early PO transition groups (73.9% vs 82.2%; P = .156), with no significant differences in secondary and safety outcomes. HLOS was significantly shorter in the early PO transition group (9 days vs 20 days; P < .001). Conclusion: Early PO transition appears to be a safe and effective strategy for uncomplicated enterococcal bacteremia and was associated with reduced HLOS.
- 15 June 2026
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
- Vol. 6 (1)
Open AccessOutcomes of early oral antibiotic transition for the treatment of uncomplicated enterococcal bacteremia
Objective: To compare clinical outcomes in adults with uncomplicated enterococcal bacteremia treated with intravenous (IV) therapy alone versus an early oral (PO) transition and evaluate treatment characteristics and safety outcomes. Design: Retrospective cohort study between January 1, 2021, and August 1, 2024. The primary outcome was clinical cure at 90 days after antibiotic completion. Secondary outcomes included treatment failure, infection-related readmission, hospital length of stay (HLOS), and 90-day mortality. Setting: Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, two tertiary care centers in Boston, MA. Patients: Adult patients with at least one positive blood culture with Enterococcus spp. Patients were excluded if they had polymicrobial or persistent bacteremia, invasive infection, incomplete source control, died before completing therapy, or received fewer than 7 days of antibiotics. Results: 209 patients were included, of which 119 received IV therapy alone and 90 underwent early PO transition. Gastrointestinal (41.6%) and genitourinary (32.1%) sources were most common, and 86 patients (41.1%) had immunocompromising conditions. Clinical cure was similar between the IV and early PO transition groups (73.9% vs 82.2%; P = .156), with no significant differences in secondary and safety outcomes. HLOS was significantly shorter in the early PO transition group (9 days vs 20 days; P < .001). Conclusion: Early PO transition appears to be a safe and effective strategy for uncomplicated enterococcal bacteremia and was associated with reduced HLOS.
- Open Access
- 24 September 2025
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Open Forum Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 12 (10)
Evaluating the Efficacy of Crushed Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Administered via Tube
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viral suppression was evaluated after receipt of crushed or dissolved bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) administered via enteral tube during hospitalization. Eighty-nine percent of patients (17/19) were virally suppressed (<200 copies/mL) within 1 year of receiving B/F/TAF via tube, suggesting that administration via tube is a reasonable alternative to changing antiretroviral regimens.
- 24 September 2025
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Open Forum Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 12 (10)
Open AccessEvaluating the Efficacy of Crushed Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Administered via Tube
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viral suppression was evaluated after receipt of crushed or dissolved bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) administered via enteral tube during hospitalization. Eighty-nine percent of patients (17/19) were virally suppressed (<200 copies/mL) within 1 year of receiving B/F/TAF via tube, suggesting that administration via tube is a reasonable alternative to changing antiretroviral regimens.
- Open Access
- 24 September 2025
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Open Forum Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 12 (10)
Evaluation of the Safety of Cefazolin Monotherapy in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy at a Large Academic Medical Center
In outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy, weekly lab monitoring is often standard practice, even for antimicrobials with low complication rates. We reviewed 420 patients treated with cefazolin: lab abnormalities associated with readmission or treatment changes occurred in 2% of patients. Reduced-frequency monitoring may be reasonable for patients treated with cefazolin outpatient.
- 24 September 2025
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Open Forum Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 12 (10)
Open AccessEvaluation of the Safety of Cefazolin Monotherapy in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy at a Large Academic Medical Center
In outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy, weekly lab monitoring is often standard practice, even for antimicrobials with low complication rates. We reviewed 420 patients treated with cefazolin: lab abnormalities associated with readmission or treatment changes occurred in 2% of patients. Reduced-frequency monitoring may be reasonable for patients treated with cefazolin outpatient.
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 13 January 2025
- Published by Elsevier in CMI Communications
- Vol. 2 (1)
Tetracyclines, the old and the new: A narrative review
- 13 January 2025
- Published by Elsevier in CMI Communications
- Vol. 2 (1)
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessTetracyclines, the old and the new: A narrative review
- Open Access
- 18 October 2024
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Open Forum Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 11 (11) , ofae600
Implementation of a Pharmacist-Driven Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Monitoring Program Using Bayesian Modeling in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy
Background: Current vancomycin monitoring guidelines recommend monitoring 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to minimum inhibitory concentration ratios for patients with serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. However, there are sparse data on the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of vancomycin AUC monitoring for outpatients. Traditional AUC pharmacokinetic calculations require 2 concentrations, while bayesian software allows for single-concentration AUC estimations. Methods: We conducted a single-center, quasi-experimental, interrupted time series study of patients enrolled in the outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program at our institution for vancomycin management. Our institution implemented a pharmacist-driven vancomycin AUC monitoring program from September 2019 to February 2020, and again from September 2022 to March 2023. Patients enrolled underwent vancomycin monitoring using an AUC goal of 400–600 mg⋅h/L, estimated through bayesian modeling. Patients enrolled in the outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program from July 2021 through August 2022 for trough-based monitoring were used for comparison. The primary outcome was nephrotoxicity incidence, defined as a serum creatinine increase by ≥0.5 mg/dL or ≥50% during outpatient vancomycin therapy. Results: We enrolled 63 patients in the AUC group and 60 patients in the trough-based group. Nephrotoxicity was significantly lower in the AUC cohort (6.3% vs 23.3%; P = .01). The number of unusable vancomycin concentrations was also significantly lower in the AUC cohort (0% vs 6%; P < .01). There was no difference in composite 90-day all-cause mortality or readmission (33.3% vs 38.3%; P = .56). Conclusions: Following implementation of a pharmacist-driven AUC monitoring program, patients were less likely to develop nephrotoxicity during outpatient vancomycin therapy.
- 18 October 2024
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Open Forum Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 11 (11) , ofae600
Open AccessImplementation of a Pharmacist-Driven Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Monitoring Program Using Bayesian Modeling in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy
Background: Current vancomycin monitoring guidelines recommend monitoring 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to minimum inhibitory concentration ratios for patients with serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. However, there are sparse data on the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of vancomycin AUC monitoring for outpatients. Traditional AUC pharmacokinetic calculations require 2 concentrations, while bayesian software allows for single-concentration AUC estimations. Methods: We conducted a single-center, quasi-experimental, interrupted time series study of patients enrolled in the outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program at our institution for vancomycin management. Our institution implemented a pharmacist-driven vancomycin AUC monitoring program from September 2019 to February 2020, and again from September 2022 to March 2023. Patients enrolled underwent vancomycin monitoring using an AUC goal of 400–600 mg⋅h/L, estimated through bayesian modeling. Patients enrolled in the outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program from July 2021 through August 2022 for trough-based monitoring were used for comparison. The primary outcome was nephrotoxicity incidence, defined as a serum creatinine increase by ≥0.5 mg/dL or ≥50% during outpatient vancomycin therapy. Results: We enrolled 63 patients in the AUC group and 60 patients in the trough-based group. Nephrotoxicity was significantly lower in the AUC cohort (6.3% vs 23.3%; P = .01). The number of unusable vancomycin concentrations was also significantly lower in the AUC cohort (0% vs 6%; P < .01). There was no difference in composite 90-day all-cause mortality or readmission (33.3% vs 38.3%; P = .56). Conclusions: Following implementation of a pharmacist-driven AUC monitoring program, patients were less likely to develop nephrotoxicity during outpatient vancomycin therapy.