Emma Lenssen
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Emma Lenssen has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Catharina van Oostveen
Erasmus School for Health Policy and Management, section Health Services Management and Organisation, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam, PA 3062, the Netherlands
1 shared publication - Frits van Merode
Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
1 shared publication - Hester Vermeulen
IQ Health Science Department Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands
1 shared publication - Julia van Kraaij
Radboud university medical center, IQ Health science department, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
1 shared publication - RN2Blend Consortium1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 4 November 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Nursing Reports
- Vol. 14 (4) , 3346-3360
Organizational Rigidity and Demands: A Qualitative Study on Nursing Work in Complex Organizations
Background/Objectives: The nursing work environment is a critical element in healthcare delivery and a strong predictor of both patient and nurse outcomes. Understanding the complexity and multifaceted nature of this environment is essential for improving nursing practices and optimizing healthcare systems. This study aimed to gain insights into the perceived characteristics of the nursing work environment, considering it as a complex and multifaceted system. Methods: A qualitative research approach was employed, involving 42 semi-structured interviews with 43 nurses and managers from academic, teaching, and general hospitals in The Netherlands. Data were collected between July 2020 and August 2021 through convenience sampling. Thematic coding was conducted to identify key patterns and themes. Results: The findings revealed that nurses demonstrated flexibility and a strong commitment to high-quality care, despite grappling with rigorous organizational tasks and processes. Four key themes emerged: (1) direct patient care as a standard feature of nursing work; (2) nurses’ flexibility for hospital productivity; (3) interdependencies, which decrease autonomous nursing practices; and (4) organizational structures that determine how nurses can shape their work. Nurses found it difficult to balance direct care with broader tasks due to organizational rigidity, revealing a gap between ideal nursing practices and daily reality. Conclusions: This study highlighted the challenges within the nursing work environment, particularly in balancing direct care with organizational demands. Addressing this gap between ideal nursing practice and reality requires a systems approach. This includes autonomous practices, supportive management, and flexible structures, allowing nurses to shape their work and enhance job satisfaction and care quality.
- 4 November 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Nursing Reports
- Vol. 14 (4) , 3346-3360
Open AccessOrganizational Rigidity and Demands: A Qualitative Study on Nursing Work in Complex Organizations
Background/Objectives: The nursing work environment is a critical element in healthcare delivery and a strong predictor of both patient and nurse outcomes. Understanding the complexity and multifaceted nature of this environment is essential for improving nursing practices and optimizing healthcare systems. This study aimed to gain insights into the perceived characteristics of the nursing work environment, considering it as a complex and multifaceted system. Methods: A qualitative research approach was employed, involving 42 semi-structured interviews with 43 nurses and managers from academic, teaching, and general hospitals in The Netherlands. Data were collected between July 2020 and August 2021 through convenience sampling. Thematic coding was conducted to identify key patterns and themes. Results: The findings revealed that nurses demonstrated flexibility and a strong commitment to high-quality care, despite grappling with rigorous organizational tasks and processes. Four key themes emerged: (1) direct patient care as a standard feature of nursing work; (2) nurses’ flexibility for hospital productivity; (3) interdependencies, which decrease autonomous nursing practices; and (4) organizational structures that determine how nurses can shape their work. Nurses found it difficult to balance direct care with broader tasks due to organizational rigidity, revealing a gap between ideal nursing practices and daily reality. Conclusions: This study highlighted the challenges within the nursing work environment, particularly in balancing direct care with organizational demands. Addressing this gap between ideal nursing practice and reality requires a systems approach. This includes autonomous practices, supportive management, and flexible structures, allowing nurses to shape their work and enhance job satisfaction and care quality.