Yixing Dong
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Yixing Dong has a total of 73 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Raphael Gottardo
Biomedical Data Science Center, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
4 shared publications - Daria Buszta
Biomedical Data Science Center, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
3 shared publications - Stéphanie Tissot-Renaud
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
3 shared publications Sylvie Andre
Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital; Swiss Cancer Center Leman, Lausanne, Switzerland
3 shared publicationsAlmudena Espin Perez
Owkin, Paris, France
2 shared publicationsAtanas Kamburov
Owkin, Paris, France
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Orchestrating Spatial Transcriptomics Analysis with Bioconductor
Spatial transcriptomics technologies provide spatially-resolved measurements of gene expression through assays that can either target selected genes or capture transcriptome-wide expression profiles. The complexity and variability of these technologies and their associated data necessitate multi-step workflows integrating diverse computational methods and software packages. We provide a freely accessible, open-source, continuously updated and tested online book containing reproducible code examples, datasets, and discussion about data analysis workflows for spatial omics data using Bioconductor in R, including interoperability with Python.
Open AccessOrchestrating Spatial Transcriptomics Analysis with Bioconductor
Spatial transcriptomics technologies provide spatially-resolved measurements of gene expression through assays that can either target selected genes or capture transcriptome-wide expression profiles. The complexity and variability of these technologies and their associated data necessitate multi-step workflows integrating diverse computational methods and software packages. We provide a freely accessible, open-source, continuously updated and tested online book containing reproducible code examples, datasets, and discussion about data analysis workflows for spatial omics data using Bioconductor in R, including interoperability with Python.
- Open Access
- 12 May 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 16 (1) , 1-18
Transcriptome analysis of archived tumors by Visium, GeoMx DSP, and Chromium reveals patient heterogeneity
Recent advancements in probe-based, full-transcriptome technologies for FFPE tissues, such as Visium CytAssist, Chromium Flex, and GeoMx DSP, enable analysis of archival samples, facilitating the generation of data from extensive cohorts. However, these methods can be labor-intensive and costly, requiring informed selection based on research objectives. We compare these methods on FFPE tumor samples in Breast, NSCLC and DLBCL showing 1) good-quality, highly reproducible data from all methods; 2) GeoMx data containing cell mixtures despite marker-based preselection; 3) Visium and Chromium outperform GeoMx in discovering tumor heterogeneity and potential drug targets. We recommend the use of Visium and Chromium for high-throughput and discovery projects, while the manually more challenging GeoMx platform with targeted regions remains valuable for specialized questions.
- 12 May 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 16 (1) , 1-18
Open AccessTranscriptome analysis of archived tumors by Visium, GeoMx DSP, and Chromium reveals patient heterogeneity
Recent advancements in probe-based, full-transcriptome technologies for FFPE tissues, such as Visium CytAssist, Chromium Flex, and GeoMx DSP, enable analysis of archival samples, facilitating the generation of data from extensive cohorts. However, these methods can be labor-intensive and costly, requiring informed selection based on research objectives. We compare these methods on FFPE tumor samples in Breast, NSCLC and DLBCL showing 1) good-quality, highly reproducible data from all methods; 2) GeoMx data containing cell mixtures despite marker-based preselection; 3) Visium and Chromium outperform GeoMx in discovering tumor heterogeneity and potential drug targets. We recommend the use of Visium and Chromium for high-throughput and discovery projects, while the manually more challenging GeoMx platform with targeted regions remains valuable for specialized questions.
- Open Access
From Transcripts to Cells: Dissecting Sensitivity, Signal Contamination, and Specificity in Xenium Spatial Transcriptomics
Spatial transcriptomics has transformed our ability to map gene expression within intact tissues at cellular and subcellular resolution. Among current platforms, Xenium is widely adopted for its reliability, accessibility, and high data quality. Yet, the properties and limitations of Xenium-derived data remain poorly characterized. Here, we present one of the most comprehensive Xenium datasets to date, encompassing over 40 breast and lung tumor sections profiled using a diverse set of gene panels. Leveraging this resource, we systematically dissect technical noise—including transcript diffusion—alongside assay specificity, panel performance, and segmentation strategies. Our comparison of targeted panels with the newer 5K panel reveals that although the latter captures more transcripts overall, it suffers from reduced per-gene sensitivity and persistent diffusion, even with enhanced chemistry. We demonstrate that single-nucleus RNA-seq (snRNA-seq) markedly improves cell type annotation and enables more precise quantification of diffusion. Building on this, we introduce SPLIT (Spatial Purification of Layered Intracellular Transcripts), a novel method that integrates snRNA-seq with RCTD deconvolution to enhance signal purity. SPLIT effectively resolves mixed transcriptomic signals, improving background correction and cell-type resolution. Together, our findings provide a critical benchmark for Xenium performance and introduce a scalable strategy for signal refinement—advancing the accuracy and utility of spatial transcriptomics.
Open AccessFrom Transcripts to Cells: Dissecting Sensitivity, Signal Contamination, and Specificity in Xenium Spatial Transcriptomics
Spatial transcriptomics has transformed our ability to map gene expression within intact tissues at cellular and subcellular resolution. Among current platforms, Xenium is widely adopted for its reliability, accessibility, and high data quality. Yet, the properties and limitations of Xenium-derived data remain poorly characterized. Here, we present one of the most comprehensive Xenium datasets to date, encompassing over 40 breast and lung tumor sections profiled using a diverse set of gene panels. Leveraging this resource, we systematically dissect technical noise—including transcript diffusion—alongside assay specificity, panel performance, and segmentation strategies. Our comparison of targeted panels with the newer 5K panel reveals that although the latter captures more transcripts overall, it suffers from reduced per-gene sensitivity and persistent diffusion, even with enhanced chemistry. We demonstrate that single-nucleus RNA-seq (snRNA-seq) markedly improves cell type annotation and enables more precise quantification of diffusion. Building on this, we introduce SPLIT (Spatial Purification of Layered Intracellular Transcripts), a novel method that integrates snRNA-seq with RCTD deconvolution to enhance signal purity. SPLIT effectively resolves mixed transcriptomic signals, improving background correction and cell-type resolution. Together, our findings provide a critical benchmark for Xenium performance and introduce a scalable strategy for signal refinement—advancing the accuracy and utility of spatial transcriptomics.
- Open Access
Transcriptome Analysis of Archived Tumor Tissues by Visium, GeoMx DSP, and Chromium Methods Reveals Inter- and Intra-Patient Heterogeneity
Recent advancements in probe-based, full-transcriptome, high-resolution technologies for Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) tissues, such as Visium CytAssist, Chromium Flex (10X Genomics), and GeoMx DSP (Nanostring), have opened new opportunities for studying decades-old archival samples in biobanks, facilitating the generation of data from extensive cohorts. However, the experimental protocols can be labor-intensive and costly; therefore, it is thus essential for researchers to carefully evaluate the strengths and limitations of each technology in relation to their specific research objectives. Here, we report the results of a comparative analysis of the three methods mentioned above on FFPE archival tumor samples from four non-small cell lung cancer, four breast cancer and six diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. We highlight some relative advantages and disadvantages of each method in the context of operational challenges, bioinformatic analysis and biological discovery. Our results show that: 1) all three methods yielded good-quality, highly reproducible transcriptomic data from serial sections of the same FFPE block; 2) GeoMx data contained mixtures of cell types, even when pre-selecting areas with cell type-specific markers; 3) high-throughput spot-level (Visium) or cell-level (Chromium) data enabled the identification of tumor heterogeneity within and between patients, which could be used to identify targeted therapies. Our data support the use of Visium and Chromium for high-throughput and discovery-driven projects, while the GeoMx platform could be suited for addressing specialized questions on targeted regions. All data generated from this study, including GeoMx, Visium, Chromium, H&E, and expert annotations are publicly available.
Open AccessTranscriptome Analysis of Archived Tumor Tissues by Visium, GeoMx DSP, and Chromium Methods Reveals Inter- and Intra-Patient Heterogeneity
Recent advancements in probe-based, full-transcriptome, high-resolution technologies for Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) tissues, such as Visium CytAssist, Chromium Flex (10X Genomics), and GeoMx DSP (Nanostring), have opened new opportunities for studying decades-old archival samples in biobanks, facilitating the generation of data from extensive cohorts. However, the experimental protocols can be labor-intensive and costly; therefore, it is thus essential for researchers to carefully evaluate the strengths and limitations of each technology in relation to their specific research objectives. Here, we report the results of a comparative analysis of the three methods mentioned above on FFPE archival tumor samples from four non-small cell lung cancer, four breast cancer and six diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. We highlight some relative advantages and disadvantages of each method in the context of operational challenges, bioinformatic analysis and biological discovery. Our results show that: 1) all three methods yielded good-quality, highly reproducible transcriptomic data from serial sections of the same FFPE block; 2) GeoMx data contained mixtures of cell types, even when pre-selecting areas with cell type-specific markers; 3) high-throughput spot-level (Visium) or cell-level (Chromium) data enabled the identification of tumor heterogeneity within and between patients, which could be used to identify targeted therapies. Our data support the use of Visium and Chromium for high-throughput and discovery-driven projects, while the GeoMx platform could be suited for addressing specialized questions on targeted regions. All data generated from this study, including GeoMx, Visium, Chromium, H&E, and expert annotations are publicly available.