Thomas Unger
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Thomas Unger has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Dario Vangi
University of Florence
2 shared publications - Giovanni Zonfrillo
University of Florence
2 shared publications - Michelangelo-Santo Gulino
University of Florence
2 shared publications - Peter Miklis
Verkehrsunfallforschung an der TU Dresden Gmbh, Semperstraße 2a, 01069 Dresden, Germany
2 shared publications - Susanna Papini
Department of Industrial Engineering, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Via di Santa Marta 3, 50139 Florence, Italy
2 shared publications - Angela Schubert
VUFO - Traffic Accident Research Institute at TU Dresden
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
A Safety-Based Approach for the Design of an Innovative Microvehicle
The growing popularity of Personal Light Electric Vehicles (PLEVs), such as e-scooters, has revolutionized urban mobility by offering compact, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly transportation solutions. However, safety concerns, including inadequate infrastructure, poor protective measures, and high accident rates, remain critical challenges. This paper presents the design and development of an innovative self-balancing microvehicle under the H2020 LEONARDO project, which aims to address these challenges through advanced engineering and user-centric design. The vehicle combines features of monowheels and e-scooters, integrating cutting-edge technologies to enhance safety, stability, and usability. The design adheres to European regulations, including Germany’s eKFV standards, and incorporates user preferences identified through representative online surveys of 1500 PLEV users. These preferences include improved handling on uneven surfaces, enhanced signaling capabilities, and reduced instability during maneuvers. The prototype features a lightweight composite structure reinforced with carbon fibers, a high-torque motorized front wheel, and multiple speed modes tailored to different conditions, such as travel in pedestrian areas, use by novice riders, and advanced users. Braking tests demonstrate deceleration values of up to 3.5 m/s2, comparable to PLEV market standards and exceeding regulatory minimums, while smooth acceleration ramps ensure rider stability and safety. Additional features, such as identification plates and weight-dependent motor control, enhance compliance with local traffic rules and prevent misuse. The vehicle’s design also addresses common safety concerns, such as curb navigation and signaling, by incorporating large-diameter wheels, increased ground clearance, and electrically operated direction indicators. Future upgrades include the addition of a second rear wheel for enhanced stability, skateboard-like rear axle modifications for improved maneuverability, and hybrid supercapacitors to minimize fire risks and extend battery life. With its focus on safety, regulatory compliance, and rider-friendly innovations, this microvehicle represents a significant advancement in promoting safe and sustainable urban mobility.
Open AccessA Safety-Based Approach for the Design of an Innovative Microvehicle
The growing popularity of Personal Light Electric Vehicles (PLEVs), such as e-scooters, has revolutionized urban mobility by offering compact, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly transportation solutions. However, safety concerns, including inadequate infrastructure, poor protective measures, and high accident rates, remain critical challenges. This paper presents the design and development of an innovative self-balancing microvehicle under the H2020 LEONARDO project, which aims to address these challenges through advanced engineering and user-centric design. The vehicle combines features of monowheels and e-scooters, integrating cutting-edge technologies to enhance safety, stability, and usability. The design adheres to European regulations, including Germany’s eKFV standards, and incorporates user preferences identified through representative online surveys of 1500 PLEV users. These preferences include improved handling on uneven surfaces, enhanced signaling capabilities, and reduced instability during maneuvers. The prototype features a lightweight composite structure reinforced with carbon fibers, a high-torque motorized front wheel, and multiple speed modes tailored to different conditions, such as travel in pedestrian areas, use by novice riders, and advanced users. Braking tests demonstrate deceleration values of up to 3.5 m/s2, comparable to PLEV market standards and exceeding regulatory minimums, while smooth acceleration ramps ensure rider stability and safety. Additional features, such as identification plates and weight-dependent motor control, enhance compliance with local traffic rules and prevent misuse. The vehicle’s design also addresses common safety concerns, such as curb navigation and signaling, by incorporating large-diameter wheels, increased ground clearance, and electrically operated direction indicators. Future upgrades include the addition of a second rear wheel for enhanced stability, skateboard-like rear axle modifications for improved maneuverability, and hybrid supercapacitors to minimize fire risks and extend battery life. With its focus on safety, regulatory compliance, and rider-friendly innovations, this microvehicle represents a significant advancement in promoting safe and sustainable urban mobility.
- Open Access
- 1 November 2024
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Traffic Injury Prevention
- Vol. 25 (sup1) , S105-S115
Bridging the gap: Mechanistic-based cyclist injury risk curves using two decades of crash data
Injury risk curves are vital in quantifying the relative safety consequences of real-world collisions. Previous injury risk curves for bicycle-passenger vehicle crashes have predominantly focused on frontal impacts. This creates a gap in cyclist injury risk assessment for other geometric crash configurations. The goal of this study was to create an "omnidirectional" injury risk model, informed by known injury causing mechanisms, that is applicable to most geometric configurations. We used data from years 1999-2022 of the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS). We describe the pattern of injuries for cyclists involved in collisions with passenger vehicles, and we developed injury risk functions at various AIS levels for these collisions. A mechanistic-based approach accounting for biomechanically-relevant variables was used to select model parameters a priori. Cyclist age (including children) and sex were regarded as relevant predictors of injury risk. Speed and impact geometry were captured through a novel predictor, Effective Collision Speed, which transforms the vehicle and cyclist speeds into a single value and incorporates frictional considerations observed during side engagements. Cyclist engagement with the vehicle was captured with a variable demonstrating the potential for a normal projection. We additionally present analyses weighted toward German nationwide data. We identified 6,576 cyclists involved in collisions with passenger vehicles. AIS3+ cyclist injuries occurred most often in the head, thorax, and lower extremities. Effective Collision Speed was a strong predictor of injury risk. Collisions with a potential for a normal projection were associated with increased risk, though this was only significant at the MAIS2+F severity level. Younger children had slightly higher injury risk compared to young adults, while elderly cyclists had the highest risk of AIS3+ injury. Sex was a significant predictor only for the MAIS2+F injury risk curves. U.S. cyclist fatalities increased 55% from 2010 to 2021. To reduce injuries and fatalities, it is crucial to understand cyclist injury risk. This study builds on previous analyses by including children, incorporating additional mechanistic predictors, broadening the scope of included crashes, and using weighting to generalize these estimates toward national German statistics.
- 1 November 2024
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Traffic Injury Prevention
- Vol. 25 (sup1) , S105-S115
Open AccessBridging the gap: Mechanistic-based cyclist injury risk curves using two decades of crash data
Injury risk curves are vital in quantifying the relative safety consequences of real-world collisions. Previous injury risk curves for bicycle-passenger vehicle crashes have predominantly focused on frontal impacts. This creates a gap in cyclist injury risk assessment for other geometric crash configurations. The goal of this study was to create an "omnidirectional" injury risk model, informed by known injury causing mechanisms, that is applicable to most geometric configurations. We used data from years 1999-2022 of the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS). We describe the pattern of injuries for cyclists involved in collisions with passenger vehicles, and we developed injury risk functions at various AIS levels for these collisions. A mechanistic-based approach accounting for biomechanically-relevant variables was used to select model parameters a priori. Cyclist age (including children) and sex were regarded as relevant predictors of injury risk. Speed and impact geometry were captured through a novel predictor, Effective Collision Speed, which transforms the vehicle and cyclist speeds into a single value and incorporates frictional considerations observed during side engagements. Cyclist engagement with the vehicle was captured with a variable demonstrating the potential for a normal projection. We additionally present analyses weighted toward German nationwide data. We identified 6,576 cyclists involved in collisions with passenger vehicles. AIS3+ cyclist injuries occurred most often in the head, thorax, and lower extremities. Effective Collision Speed was a strong predictor of injury risk. Collisions with a potential for a normal projection were associated with increased risk, though this was only significant at the MAIS2+F severity level. Younger children had slightly higher injury risk compared to young adults, while elderly cyclists had the highest risk of AIS3+ injury. Sex was a significant predictor only for the MAIS2+F injury risk curves. U.S. cyclist fatalities increased 55% from 2010 to 2021. To reduce injuries and fatalities, it is crucial to understand cyclist injury risk. This study builds on previous analyses by including children, incorporating additional mechanistic predictors, broadening the scope of included crashes, and using weighting to generalize these estimates toward national German statistics.