ABAngelo Barbato

Angelo Barbato

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Angelo Barbato has a total of 21 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Correction: Multiparametric ultrasound for non‑invasive evaluation of kidney graft function

    by Maria Irene Bellini, Sergio Angeletti, Daniele Fresilli, Mattia Di Segni, Gian Marco Lo Conte, Raponi Flavia, Manuela Garofalo, Renzo Pretagostini, Corrado De Vito, Patrizia Pacini, et al.

  • Open Access

    Multiparametric ultrasound for non-invasive evaluation of kidney graft function

    by Maria Irene Bellini, Sergio Angeletti, Daniele Fresilli, Mattia Di Segni, Gian Marco Lo Conte, Raponi Flavia, Manuela Garofalo, Renzo Pretagostini, Corrado De Vito, Patrizia Pacini, et al.

    Background: Renal transplant (RT) remains the optimal treatment for end-stage renal disease and early complications might be detected in the postoperative period to improve long-term outcomes. To this regard, contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) could be utilized to evaluate RT functional recovery and potentially detect acute rejection (AR) and/or renal ischemia signs. Materials and methods: Observational study of 107 consecutive patients waitlisted for RT. Participants underwent conventional ultrasound (CUS) and color-doppler-ultrasound (CDUS) to evaluate resistive index of segmental and interlobar arteries and quantitative CEUS techniques recording the following perfusion parameters: peak intensity (PI-c), rising time (RT-c), area under (AUC-c) the time intensity curve (TIC), time to peak (TTP-c) and mean transit time (MTT-c). Results: CEUS parameters sensibility and specificity to predict AR in the early post-operative period resulted in: 90% and 69% for PI-c, 95% and 64% for RT-c, 85% and 65% for AUC-c. The overall diagnostic performance of these three CEUS parameters in comparison to the same in CUS and CDUS resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 49%, versus 85% and 46%, respectively, therefore CEUS examination with the analysis of PI-c, RT-c and AUC-c values increases the diagnostic sensitivity in predicting AR by approximately 15–20% compared to CDUS and by 30–40% compared to CUS. Conclusion: CEUS could be routinely included in RT follow-up, as it shows to be a non-invasive helpful diagnostic tool for early detection of renal graft complications, selecting patients eventually in need of further confirmation.


  • Open Access

    A Machine Learning Model Based on Thyroid US Radiomics to Discriminate Between Benign and Malignant Nodules

    by Antonino Guerrisi, Elena Seri, Vincenzo Dolcetti, Ludovica Miseo, Fulvia Elia, Gianmarco Lo Conte, Giovanni Del Gaudio, Patrizia Pacini, Angelo Barbato, Emanuele David, et al.

    Background/Objectives: Thyroid nodules are a very common finding, mostly benign but sometimes malignant, and thus require accurate diagnosis. Ultrasound and fine needle biopsy are the most widely used and reliable diagnostic methods to date, but they are sometimes limited in addressing benign from malignant nodules, mainly with regard to ultrasound, by the operator’s experience. Radiomics, quantitative feature extraction from medical images and machine learning offer promising avenues to improve diagnosis. The aim of this work was to develop a machine learning model based on thyroid ultrasound images to classify nodules into benign and malignant classes. Methods: For this purpose, images of ultrasonography from 142 subjects were collected. Among these subjects, 40 patients (28.2%) belonged to the class “malignant” and 102 patients (71.8%) belonged to the class “benign”, according to histological diagnosis from fine-needle aspiration. This image set was used for the training, cross-validation and internal testing of three different machine learning models. A robust radiomic approach was applied, under the hypothesis that the radiomic feature could capture the disease heterogeneity among the two groups. Three models consisting of four ensembles of machine learning classifiers (random forests, support vector machines and k-nearest neighbor classifiers) were developed for the binary classification task of interest. The best performing model was then externally tested on a cohort of 21 new patients. Results: The best model (ensemble of random forest) showed Receiver Operating Characteristic-Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) (%) of 85 (majority vote), 83.7 ** (mean) [80.2–87.2], accuracy (%) of 83, 81.2 ** [77.1–85.2], sensitivity (%) of 70, 67.5 ** [64.3–70.7], specificity (%) of 88, 86.5 ** [82–91], positive predictive value (PPV) (%) of 70, 66.5 ** [57.9–75.1] and negative predictive value (NPV) (%) of 88, 87.1 ** [85.5–88.8] (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005) in the internal test cohort. It achieved an accuracy of 90.5%, a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 86.7%, a PPV of 75% and an NPV of 100% in the external testing cohort. Conclusions: The model constituted of four ensembles of random forest classifiers could identify all the malignant nodes and the consistent majority of benign in the external testing cohort.