Abdullah Al-Taiar

Purpose: Postpartum Depression (PPD) is the most common mental health complication of childbirth, and has short-term and long-term consequences for mother, child, and the entire family. PPD is a function of several factors. Prenatal exposure to nicotine (PEN) by Active Tobacco Smoking (ATS), Secondhand Smoking (SHS), or Electronic Nicotine Products (ENPs) is a major potential risk factor. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to summarize and evaluate all evidence regarding the association between PEN and PPD. Methods: We searched the following databases, PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and CINHAL, for studies published between Jan.1st ,2000&Sep.19th ,2024, with the outcome PPD. Studies quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Pooled Prevalence (PP) was calculated using the Freeman-Tukey Double Arcsine Transformation method. Pooled Odds Ratio (pooled-OR) was estimated using a random-effects model. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the leave-one-out technique. Results: Of 29 studies in the systematic review, 26 included in the meta-analysis. PP of PPD was 0.15,(95% CI[0.12–0.17]; I ² = 99.80%, p < 0.001). Pooled-OR for ATS 1.96,(95%CI[1.59–2.41]; Z = 6.46, p < 0.001), 1.22,(95%CI[0.69–2.18], Z = 0.69, p = 0.49) for SHS, and 1.14,(95%CI[0.82–1.58,Z = 0.78, p = 0.43) for ENPs. While the overall Pooled-OR for all PEN was 1.74,(95%CI[1.44–2.12]; Z = 5.59, p < 0.001), funnel plots and Egger test showed no evidence of publication bias. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the findings. Conclusion: This meta-analysis reveals that the accumulated evidence shows a significant association between prenatal PEN and PPD; though this final finding should be interpreted cautiously due to the high heterogeneity. Therefore, the exposure-stratified estimates represent the principal findings of this meta-analysis. The findings indicates a significant association between prenatal ATS and PPD, but no clear conclusion could be drawn about prenatal SHS or ENPs use due to the limited number of studies. There is a need for future studies that prospectively assess the impact of SHS and ENP on PPD.

The effect of treating periodontal disease (PD) during pregnancy on adverse birth outcomes, such as preterm birth (PTB) and/or low birth weight (LBW), remains unclear. This is partially due to the fact that Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) have used different combinations of treatment approaches to test this hypothesis. In this meta-analysis of RCTs, we assessed the impact of treating PD during pregnancy with scaling and root planning (SRP) and mouthwash use on PTB and LBW. A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy was employed across electronic databases, including PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 Tool. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effect models. Out of 133 initially identified reports, 9 RCTs involving 3,985 pregnant women met the inclusion criteria. Periodontal treatment with SRP and mouthwash use in pregnancy was associated with a lower risk of PTB and LBW in meta-analysis with random effects models (pooled RR for PTB = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22–0.88) and (pooled RR for LBW = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.13–0.84). Substantial heterogeneity was observed among studies (I2 = 91% and 90% for PTB and LBW, respectively), with sensitivity analysis suggesting potential sources of heterogeneity. Funnel plot assessment for publication bias showed evidence of asymmetry. SRP with mouthwash use during pregnancy were associated with significantly lower risks of PTB and LBW. Larger, well-conducted RCTs are warranted to address this issue, as existing trials are small and exhibit methodological and statistical heterogeneity.