Nada Eldawy

Background: This study on US adult cancer risk perceptions aims to explore the relationship between an individual’s perceived risk of developing cancer and the extent to which they engage in preventative behaviors, such as nutrition and physical activity. Methods: Data were obtained from the 2025 Health Information National Trends Survey 7 (HINTS 7). Descriptive statistics were generated to explore participants’ sociodemographic characteristics and cancer risk perceptions. Multinomial regression analysis was used to examine associations between cancer beliefs and consumption of alcohol, fruit, and vegetables. Results: Using multinomial logistic regression, significant associations (p < 0.001) were reported across all cancer beliefs and daily intake of 1–5 drinks per day, as well as ≥6 drinks per day. Significant associations (p < 0.001) were also reported across all cancer beliefs and daily intake of fruits and vegetables, which was further broken down into <½ cup per day to 1 cup, 1 to <2 cups, 2 to <4 cups, and greater than 4 cups. Conclusions: Our findings support the need for greater cancer knowledge dissemination and awareness in communities.

Objective: The objective of this retrospective cross-sectional study is to explore how caregiver social determinants of health, appraisal of healthcare provider effectiveness, and insurance coverage influence caregiver ability to have their adolescent child access vision care, including completion of annual vision screening, visiting an ophthalmologist or optometrist, and completion of recommended additional screenings. Study Design: We used National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) data for 12–17-year-old adolescents for the years 2022 and 2023 (n = 37,425). Summary statistics for the selected sample were generated and binary logistic regressions were conducted. Outcome variables were the type of vision screening that occurred or not. Covariates were socioeconomic and demographic data of the adolescent’s primary caregiver. Independent variables were insurance coverage and healthcare provider’s skill and effectiveness. Results: Significant associations were reported between visiting an ophthalmologist or optometrist and each of spending enough time with patients; listening carefully to patients; and making patients feel like care is a partnership. Additionally, significant associations were reported between insurance coverage and both successful completion of vision screening and visiting an eye doctor. Conclusions: This study underscores the substantial impact of effectiveness of eye doctors in delivering annual vision exams and insurance adequacy on adolescent vision care engagement. Our results will inform the development of future evidence-based educational interventions to raise awareness on the importance of annual vision screenings in US adolescents and emphasize the need for screening mandates to advocate for this important public health issue.

Background: The United States (US) continues to face a substantial burden of cervical cancer, which has been the focus of many policies and public health prevention agendas. Of the numerous risk factors associated with cervical cancer, human papillomavirus (HPV) infection remains the leading and most preventable cause of this chronic disease. Therefore, one major public health prevention strategy to decrease cervical cancer cases is HPV vaccination. Another screening tool that enables cervical cancer prevention and early intervention is the Pap smear, the primary method of screening for abnormal cervical cells. However, barriers such as social determinants of health and ineffective patient–provider communication hinder access to such critical preventive measures. The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of the knowledge level of US female adults, aged 21–65 years, concerning HPV infection and cervical cancer prevention using the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) database. Additionally, it assessed associations between patient–provider communication and the completion of Pap smear tests. Methods: Descriptive statistics were computed to explore the sociodemographic characteristics of female survey participants as well as to gather frequency and percentages of responses related to knowledge of HPV, awareness of the HPV vaccine, and history of Pap smear. Chi-squared tests were carried out to examine the associations between awareness of a cervical cancer vaccine or HPV shot and whether the participant has had a Pap smear, heard of the HPV vaccine, and knowledge of HPV’s association with cervical cancer. Next, binary logistic regression models were built to determine the size and direction of the association between patient–provider communication metrics and measures of (1) having had a Pap smear, (2) participant knowledge of HPV, (3) participant awareness of causality between HPV and cervical cancer, and (4) participant knowledge of HPV vaccine and cervical cancer prevention measures. Results: A substantial majority of participants (81.8%) reported having heard of HPV. Among them, 72.1% recognized that HPV could cause cervical cancer. Awareness of the HPV vaccine was reported by 88.1%, suggesting a relatively high reach of effective public health messaging. Regarding Pap tests, 43.3% of participants had undergone testing within the past year, but 12.6% had not been tested in over five years, and 3.6% have never been tested. Bivariate analysis using chi-squared tests revealed significant associations between participants’ history of Pap smears and their knowledge of HPV infection, its role in cervical cancer, and HPV vaccination as a prevention tool. Participants who had undergone a Pap test were more likely to have heard of HPV (p < 0.001), were knowledgeable of the HPV vaccine (p < 0.001), and were more aware of the HPV vaccine (p < 0.001). Participants reporting “never” for certain communication criteria significantly had an increased risk of having lower knowledge levels about the HPV vaccine and other cervical cancer prevention measures. They also had almost twice the risk of having lower knowledge levels about HPV prevention measures when reporting “never” (RR = 1.997, 95% CI (1.018–3.916) for “spending enough time with patients” compared to those selecting “always”. Additionally, participants responding “sometimes” (RR = 1.889, 95% CI (1.187–3.005) rather than “always” to feeling involved in healthcare decisions had a significantly higher risk of being unaware of the vaccine or other cervical cancer prevention measures. Conclusions: Strengthening provider communication and education skills not only encourages greater patient knowledge and adherence to preventative measures, such as HPV and cervical cancer screening, but also reduces disparities in healthcare stemming from limited health literacy.

Background: Patient-centered communication is a critical process in high-quality healthcare that emphasizes the reciprocal sharing of information between providers and patients to ensure care aligns with the patient’s needs, preferences, and personal values. A significant challenge arises from the healthcare provider’s time constraints during clinical encounters and the lack of adequate training on how to adopt a patient-centered communication style that addresses patient concerns, making it difficult to foster an environment conducive to shared decision making. These issues are further exacerbated by cultural and language barriers, along with low levels of health literacy and social determinants of health (SDoHs), which complicate efforts to deliver patient-centered care. Objective: This study examined quality criteria for patient–provider communication (PPC) and their associations with sociodemographic characteristics and SDoHs on housing, transportation, and food insecurity. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed data from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS-6) national dataset. Associations between PPC and sociodemographic variables were tested using the chi-squared test. Binary logistic regression was carried out to examine the association between three PPC criteria and each of the sociodemographic characteristics and patient comfort in disclosing information on SDoHs. Results: Bivariate analyses showed statistically significant associations for age, occupation status, marital status, Hispanic origin, and race across all three PPC criteria. Significant associations were reported for education and income for the two criteria related to being given the chance to ask questions and being involved in healthcare decisions. Finally, significant associations were reported for all PPC criteria and patient comfort levels in discussing SDoHs. Conclusions: Findings from this paper provide insight for enhancing the quality of PCC in underserved populations, particularly when it comes to informing the design of evidence-based cervical cancer screening interventions which are culturally centered around the patients’ needs and that integrate PPC as a foundational component.

Background: This study examines nationwide prevalence of US childhood behavioral, mental, and developmental problems in the 6–11 age group category between 2019 and 2022, and several key metrics related to caregiver social determinants of health. Methods: We used NSCH data for 6–11-year-old children for the years 2019–2022. Summary statistics for the selected sample were generated and binary logistic regressions were conducted for each severity level binary variable for each study year with caregiver mental or emotional health as a covariate. Results: Our study found significant associations between severe childhood anxiety and “fair” or “poor” caregiver rankings of mental and emotional health for both the 2020 and 2022 survey years. Our study also found that caregiver mental and emotional health may play a role in childhood ADD and ADHD prevalence rates as caregivers who ranked their mental health as “fair” or “good” had significantly higher odds of having a child with severe ADD or ADHD than caregivers who reported “excellent” mental and emotional health. Conclusion: These findings support prospects of an increase in the need for developmental health services, thus necessitating efforts towards effective allocation and focus of developmental treatment programs tailored to children and pediatric population groups.