Wiktoria Rozmarynowska
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Wiktoria Rozmarynowska has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Agnieszka Czerwińska-Osipiak
Department of Obstetric and Gynecological Nursing, Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical University of Gdańsk, M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3 A, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland
2 shared publications - Aleksandra Krawczyk
Department of Obstetric and Gynaecological Nursing, Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical University of Gdansk, Sklodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland
2 shared publications - Anna Weronika Szablewska
Division of Obstetric and Gynaecological Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences With the Institute of Maritime and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk
2 shared publications - Aleksandra Gaworska-Krzemińska
Division on Nursing Management, Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical University of Gdańsk, Sklodowskiej-Curie 3A, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland
1 shared publication - Anna Michalik
Department of Obstetric and Gynaecological Nursing, Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical University of Gdansk, Sklodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland
1 shared publication - Anna Stefanowicz-Bielska
Division of Internal and Pediatric Nursing, Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences with the Institute of Maritime and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-211 Gdansk, Poland
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 11 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 15 (10) , 3678
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in Pediatric Pain Management: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Polish HUPEDCARE-Q Among Healthcare Students and Professionals
Background/Objectives: Pediatric pain management remains a significant clinical challenge, with contemporary biopsychosocial models increasingly emphasizing humanized care and non-pharmacological strategies. This study aimed to culturally adapt and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Polish version of the HUPEDCARE-Q (Humanisation of Pediatric Care in Pain Management with a Non-Pharmacological Approach) questionnaire among healthcare professionals and students. An additional objective was to explore differences in knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported practices across different age groups and stages of professional development. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted. The cross-cultural adaptation process included independent forward translations, reconciliation, back-translation, and an expert panel review. Data were collected using online surveys. Construct validity was evaluated through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), while internal consistency reliability was assessed using McDonald’s omega coefficient and the Kuder–Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20). Group differences were analyzed utilizing the Mann–Whitney U test. Results: Because the original factor structure exhibited a suboptimal fit to the data, a revised and reduced Polish version was proposed, which demonstrated significantly improved fit indices (CFI = 0.91 for the attitudes and knowledge domains; CFI = 0.99 for the pain management domain). Exploratory bivariate analyses showed higher knowledge and attitudes scores among older participants and working professionals, whereas no statistically significant differences were observed in self-reported pediatric pain management practices. Conclusions: The revised Polish short-form adaptation of the HUPEDCARE-Q showed improved model fit and domain-specific psychometric performance, with strong internal consistency for the pediatric pain management domain, acceptable reliability for the knowledge domain, and moderate reliability for the attitudes domain. Therefore, the instrument should be interpreted as a preliminary screening and assessment tool rather than as a fully established measure with uniformly strong reliability across all domains. The observed discrepancy between higher knowledge and attitude scores and the absence of significant differences in self-reported practices may suggest that knowledge and attitudes alone are not sufficient to explain differences in self-reported pediatric pain management practices.
- 11 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 15 (10) , 3678
Open AccessKnowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in Pediatric Pain Management: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Polish HUPEDCARE-Q Among Healthcare Students and Professionals
Background/Objectives: Pediatric pain management remains a significant clinical challenge, with contemporary biopsychosocial models increasingly emphasizing humanized care and non-pharmacological strategies. This study aimed to culturally adapt and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Polish version of the HUPEDCARE-Q (Humanisation of Pediatric Care in Pain Management with a Non-Pharmacological Approach) questionnaire among healthcare professionals and students. An additional objective was to explore differences in knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported practices across different age groups and stages of professional development. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted. The cross-cultural adaptation process included independent forward translations, reconciliation, back-translation, and an expert panel review. Data were collected using online surveys. Construct validity was evaluated through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), while internal consistency reliability was assessed using McDonald’s omega coefficient and the Kuder–Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20). Group differences were analyzed utilizing the Mann–Whitney U test. Results: Because the original factor structure exhibited a suboptimal fit to the data, a revised and reduced Polish version was proposed, which demonstrated significantly improved fit indices (CFI = 0.91 for the attitudes and knowledge domains; CFI = 0.99 for the pain management domain). Exploratory bivariate analyses showed higher knowledge and attitudes scores among older participants and working professionals, whereas no statistically significant differences were observed in self-reported pediatric pain management practices. Conclusions: The revised Polish short-form adaptation of the HUPEDCARE-Q showed improved model fit and domain-specific psychometric performance, with strong internal consistency for the pediatric pain management domain, acceptable reliability for the knowledge domain, and moderate reliability for the attitudes domain. Therefore, the instrument should be interpreted as a preliminary screening and assessment tool rather than as a fully established measure with uniformly strong reliability across all domains. The observed discrepancy between higher knowledge and attitude scores and the absence of significant differences in self-reported practices may suggest that knowledge and attitudes alone are not sufficient to explain differences in self-reported pediatric pain management practices.
- Open Access
Psychosocial Factors Influencing Breastmilk Production in Mothers After Preterm Birth: The Role of Social Support in Early Lactation Success—A Cross-Sectional Study
Background: Preterm birth is a major global health issue, associated with increased neonatal morbidity and mortality. Mothers of preterm infants face unique challenges, particularly with regard to lactation, due to the complexities of preterm neonatal care. Social support has been recognized as a factor in promoting successful breastfeeding, especially in vulnerable groups such as mothers of preterm infants. Objective: This study aimed to explore the psychosocial factors influencing breastfeeding in mothers following preterm birth, with a particular focus on the role of social support in early lactation success. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted between December 2022 and March 2023 at a tertiary referral hospital in Poland. The study included 130 women (71 mothers of preterm infants and 59 mothers of full-term infants) in the early postpartum period. Data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire and the Polish version of the Berlin Social Support Scales (BSSS). Lactation success was assessed based on the mother’s ability to initiate and maintain breastfeeding or expressed milk production. Statistical analyses included Mann–Whitney U tests, Pearson’s Chi-Square, and logistic regression to determine the association between social support and lactation outcomes. Results: The study revealed that mothers of preterm infants exhibited a greater need for social support compared with those who delivered at term. Social support, particularly perceived emotional and practical support, appeared to be significantly associated with successful early lactation. Women who received adequate social support were more likely to initiate breastfeeding early and maintain lactation. Conclusions: Psychosocial factors, particularly social support, play a critical role in the success of lactation among mothers of preterm infants. These findings underscore the need for comprehensive support systems for mothers of preterm infants to promote breastfeeding and improve neonatal health outcomes.
Open AccessPsychosocial Factors Influencing Breastmilk Production in Mothers After Preterm Birth: The Role of Social Support in Early Lactation Success—A Cross-Sectional Study
Background: Preterm birth is a major global health issue, associated with increased neonatal morbidity and mortality. Mothers of preterm infants face unique challenges, particularly with regard to lactation, due to the complexities of preterm neonatal care. Social support has been recognized as a factor in promoting successful breastfeeding, especially in vulnerable groups such as mothers of preterm infants. Objective: This study aimed to explore the psychosocial factors influencing breastfeeding in mothers following preterm birth, with a particular focus on the role of social support in early lactation success. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted between December 2022 and March 2023 at a tertiary referral hospital in Poland. The study included 130 women (71 mothers of preterm infants and 59 mothers of full-term infants) in the early postpartum period. Data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire and the Polish version of the Berlin Social Support Scales (BSSS). Lactation success was assessed based on the mother’s ability to initiate and maintain breastfeeding or expressed milk production. Statistical analyses included Mann–Whitney U tests, Pearson’s Chi-Square, and logistic regression to determine the association between social support and lactation outcomes. Results: The study revealed that mothers of preterm infants exhibited a greater need for social support compared with those who delivered at term. Social support, particularly perceived emotional and practical support, appeared to be significantly associated with successful early lactation. Women who received adequate social support were more likely to initiate breastfeeding early and maintain lactation. Conclusions: Psychosocial factors, particularly social support, play a critical role in the success of lactation among mothers of preterm infants. These findings underscore the need for comprehensive support systems for mothers of preterm infants to promote breastfeeding and improve neonatal health outcomes.