Sedin Kobašlija
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Sedin Kobašlija has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Damir Duratbegović
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry with Dental Clinical Center, University of Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
2 shared publications - Nedim Pervan
Department of Mechanical Design, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
2 shared publications - Selma Jakupović
Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
2 shared publications - Enis Muratović
Department of Mechanical Design, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 shared publication - Vedran Jakupović
Department of Community Healthcare, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Evaluation of the Effect of Different Light-Curing Protocols on the Microhardness of Contemporary Bulk-Fill Resin Composites
Background: The study investigates newly developed composite materials with advanced filler technology and modified resin matrices, designed to enhance esthetic quality, clinical efficiency, and mechanical properties. This study evaluated the effect of two light-curing protocols—a conventional low-voltage (LV) protocol (10 s at 1200 mW/cm2) and a high-voltage (HV) protocol (3 s at 3000 mW/cm2)—on the microhardness (MH), bottom/top MH ratio, and the correlation between filler content (wt%, vol%) and MH of bulk-fill resin-based composites (RBCs). Four RBCs were tested: Tetric PlusFill (TPF), Tetric Plus Flow(TPFW), Tetric PowerFill (PFL), and Tetric PowerFlow (PFW). Materials and Methods: Samples were fabricated in the laboratory using specially designed cylindrical molds (diameter = 8 mm, height = 4 mm). Initial MH was measured on the top and bottom surfaces of composite specimens 24 h after light curing using a digital microhardness tester (QNESS 60 M EVO, ATM Qness GmbH, Mammelzen, Germany). The correlation between the filler content (wt%, vol%) and the MH of the RBCs was tested. For the calculation of depth-dependent curing effectiveness, the bottom/top ratio for initial MH was used. Conclusions: The MH of bulk-fill RBCs was found to be influenced by both material composition and the applied light-curing protocol. An increase in filler content resulted in higher MH values under both protocols, with the filler volume fraction exhibiting a stronger correlation than the weight fraction. While both flowable and sculptable Tetric Plus composites exhibited higher MH values under the HV protocol, Tetric Power composites demonstrated greater initial hardness under LV protocol. The flowable composite PFW showed the most pronounced reduction in MH under HV curing. The bottom/top MH ratio exceeded 80% in all tested materials, confirming adequate polymerization throughout the composite layers.
Open AccessEvaluation of the Effect of Different Light-Curing Protocols on the Microhardness of Contemporary Bulk-Fill Resin Composites
Background: The study investigates newly developed composite materials with advanced filler technology and modified resin matrices, designed to enhance esthetic quality, clinical efficiency, and mechanical properties. This study evaluated the effect of two light-curing protocols—a conventional low-voltage (LV) protocol (10 s at 1200 mW/cm2) and a high-voltage (HV) protocol (3 s at 3000 mW/cm2)—on the microhardness (MH), bottom/top MH ratio, and the correlation between filler content (wt%, vol%) and MH of bulk-fill resin-based composites (RBCs). Four RBCs were tested: Tetric PlusFill (TPF), Tetric Plus Flow(TPFW), Tetric PowerFill (PFL), and Tetric PowerFlow (PFW). Materials and Methods: Samples were fabricated in the laboratory using specially designed cylindrical molds (diameter = 8 mm, height = 4 mm). Initial MH was measured on the top and bottom surfaces of composite specimens 24 h after light curing using a digital microhardness tester (QNESS 60 M EVO, ATM Qness GmbH, Mammelzen, Germany). The correlation between the filler content (wt%, vol%) and the MH of the RBCs was tested. For the calculation of depth-dependent curing effectiveness, the bottom/top ratio for initial MH was used. Conclusions: The MH of bulk-fill RBCs was found to be influenced by both material composition and the applied light-curing protocol. An increase in filler content resulted in higher MH values under both protocols, with the filler volume fraction exhibiting a stronger correlation than the weight fraction. While both flowable and sculptable Tetric Plus composites exhibited higher MH values under the HV protocol, Tetric Power composites demonstrated greater initial hardness under LV protocol. The flowable composite PFW showed the most pronounced reduction in MH under HV curing. The bottom/top MH ratio exceeded 80% in all tested materials, confirming adequate polymerization throughout the composite layers.
- Open Access
The Effects of Intensity, Exposure Time, and Distance of Polymerization Light on Vickers Microhardness and Temperature Rise of Conventional Resin-Based Composite
(1) Background: This study investigates the effects of curing light intensity, exposure time, and distance on the Vickers microhardness (VMH), hardness bottom-to-top ratio (HR), and temperature rise (TR) of conventional dental resin-based composite (RBC). (2) Materials and Methods: Specimens of one conventional RBC (Tetric EvoCeram, Ivoclar Vivadent) were cured with 12 different curing protocols (CPs), created with three different light intensities (Quartz Tungsten Halogen 300 mW/cm2, LED 650 mW/cm2, LED 1100 mW/cm2), two exposure times (20 and 40 s), and two distances of curing tip (0 and 8 mm). The VMH of top (VMH-T) and bottom (VMH-B) surfaces was measured. The hardness bottom-to-top ratio (HR) was calculated from VMH-B and VMH-T. The HR below 80% was rated as inadequate polymerization. The TR at the depth of 2 mm within the RBC was measured using a K-type thermocouple. Data were analyzed using Levene’s test and the multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. (3) Results: Exposure time and distance significantly influenced VMH-B and HR. Increased distance significantly reduced VMH-B, HR, and TR. CPs 300 mW/cm2/8 mm/20 s and 650 mW/cm2/8 mm/20 s produced inadequate polymerization (HR < 80%). Prolonged exposure time produced higher values of VMH-B and HR. The TR was significantly influenced by light intensity and distance. (4) Conclusions: Suboptimal light intensity (2) can produce inadequate polymerization at the lower side of the composite layer when used from a distance. Prolonged irradiation can improve the polymerization to a certain extent. Clinicians are advised to monitor the intensity of the LCUs in order to optimize the photopolymerization process. Caution is required when polymerizing with high-intensity curing light in direct contact with the RBC with longer exposure times than recommended.
Open AccessThe Effects of Intensity, Exposure Time, and Distance of Polymerization Light on Vickers Microhardness and Temperature Rise of Conventional Resin-Based Composite
(1) Background: This study investigates the effects of curing light intensity, exposure time, and distance on the Vickers microhardness (VMH), hardness bottom-to-top ratio (HR), and temperature rise (TR) of conventional dental resin-based composite (RBC). (2) Materials and Methods: Specimens of one conventional RBC (Tetric EvoCeram, Ivoclar Vivadent) were cured with 12 different curing protocols (CPs), created with three different light intensities (Quartz Tungsten Halogen 300 mW/cm2, LED 650 mW/cm2, LED 1100 mW/cm2), two exposure times (20 and 40 s), and two distances of curing tip (0 and 8 mm). The VMH of top (VMH-T) and bottom (VMH-B) surfaces was measured. The hardness bottom-to-top ratio (HR) was calculated from VMH-B and VMH-T. The HR below 80% was rated as inadequate polymerization. The TR at the depth of 2 mm within the RBC was measured using a K-type thermocouple. Data were analyzed using Levene’s test and the multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. (3) Results: Exposure time and distance significantly influenced VMH-B and HR. Increased distance significantly reduced VMH-B, HR, and TR. CPs 300 mW/cm2/8 mm/20 s and 650 mW/cm2/8 mm/20 s produced inadequate polymerization (HR < 80%). Prolonged exposure time produced higher values of VMH-B and HR. The TR was significantly influenced by light intensity and distance. (4) Conclusions: Suboptimal light intensity (2) can produce inadequate polymerization at the lower side of the composite layer when used from a distance. Prolonged irradiation can improve the polymerization to a certain extent. Clinicians are advised to monitor the intensity of the LCUs in order to optimize the photopolymerization process. Caution is required when polymerizing with high-intensity curing light in direct contact with the RBC with longer exposure times than recommended.