Fotios Papadogiannis
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Fotios Papadogiannis has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Aristea Batsali
Haemopoiesis Research Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece
1 shared publication - Athanasios Mantalaris
Biological Systems Engineering Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
1 shared publication - Michail E. Klontzas
Artificial Intelligence and Translational Imaging (ATI) Lab, Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
1 shared publication - Nicki Panoskaltsis
Department of Haematology, Imperial College London, London, UK
1 shared publication - Spyros I. Vernardis
The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 5 December 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Functional Biomaterials
- Vol. 15 (12) , 367
Machine Learning and Metabolomics Predict Mesenchymal Stem Cell Osteogenic Differentiation in 2D and 3D Cultures
Stem cells have been widely used to produce artificial bone grafts. Nonetheless, the variability in the degree of stem cell differentiation is an inherent drawback of artificial graft development and requires robust evaluation tools that can certify the quality of stem cell-based products and avoid source-tissue-related and patient-specific variability in outcomes. Omics analyses have been utilised for the evaluation of stem cell attributes in all stages of stem cell biomanufacturing. Herein, metabolomics in combination with machine learning was utilised for the benchmarking of osteogenic differentiation quality in 2D and 3D cultures. Metabolomics analysis was performed with the use of gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). A set of 11 metabolites was used to train an XGboost model which achieved excellent performance in distinguishing between differentiated and undifferentiated umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells (UCB MSCs). The model was benchmarked against samples not present in the training set, being able to efficiently capture osteogenesis in 3D UCB MSC cultures with an area under the curve (AUC) of 82.6%. On the contrary, the model did not capture any differentiation in Wharton’s Jelly MSC samples, which are well-known underperformers in osteogenic differentiation (AUC of 56.2%). Mineralisation was significantly correlated with the levels of fumarate, glycerol, and myo-inositol, the four metabolites found most important for model performance (R2 = 0.89, R2 = 0.94, and R2 = 0.96, and p = 0.016, p = 0.0059, and p = 0.0022, respectively). In conclusion, our results indicate that metabolomics in combination with machine learning can be used for the development of reliable potency assays for the evaluation of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products.
- 5 December 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Functional Biomaterials
- Vol. 15 (12) , 367
Open AccessMachine Learning and Metabolomics Predict Mesenchymal Stem Cell Osteogenic Differentiation in 2D and 3D Cultures
Stem cells have been widely used to produce artificial bone grafts. Nonetheless, the variability in the degree of stem cell differentiation is an inherent drawback of artificial graft development and requires robust evaluation tools that can certify the quality of stem cell-based products and avoid source-tissue-related and patient-specific variability in outcomes. Omics analyses have been utilised for the evaluation of stem cell attributes in all stages of stem cell biomanufacturing. Herein, metabolomics in combination with machine learning was utilised for the benchmarking of osteogenic differentiation quality in 2D and 3D cultures. Metabolomics analysis was performed with the use of gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). A set of 11 metabolites was used to train an XGboost model which achieved excellent performance in distinguishing between differentiated and undifferentiated umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells (UCB MSCs). The model was benchmarked against samples not present in the training set, being able to efficiently capture osteogenesis in 3D UCB MSC cultures with an area under the curve (AUC) of 82.6%. On the contrary, the model did not capture any differentiation in Wharton’s Jelly MSC samples, which are well-known underperformers in osteogenic differentiation (AUC of 56.2%). Mineralisation was significantly correlated with the levels of fumarate, glycerol, and myo-inositol, the four metabolites found most important for model performance (R2 = 0.89, R2 = 0.94, and R2 = 0.96, and p = 0.016, p = 0.0059, and p = 0.0022, respectively). In conclusion, our results indicate that metabolomics in combination with machine learning can be used for the development of reliable potency assays for the evaluation of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products.