Tina Rastegar Lari
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Tina Rastegar Lari has a total of 14 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Enno Schmidt
Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
3 shared publications - Nina van Beek
Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Venerologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland
3 shared publications - Shirin Emtenani
Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
3 shared publications - Charlotte Kiehne
Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
2 shared publications - Hasan Onur Dikmen
Department of Dermatology University of Lübeck Lübeck Germany
2 shared publications - Imke Weyers
Institute of Anatomy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 23 January 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomolecules
- Vol. 16 (2) , 182
Selective Complement Inhibition in Anti-p200 Pemphigoid: Immune Infiltrate Profiles and Therapeutic Implications Compared to Bullous Pemphigoid
Anti-p200 pemphigoid is an autoimmune blistering disease (AIBD) caused by autoantibodies against laminin β4 and/or γ1, and clinically resembles bullous pemphigoid (BP) as well as the inflammatory variant of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA). All three diseases show IgG and/or C3 deposition along the cutaneous basement membrane zone (BMZ). Although complement activation is central to BP and EBA pathogenesis, its role in anti-p200 pemphigoid remains unclear. To investigate this, we analyzed inflammatory infiltrates in lesional and perilesional skin from anti-p200 pemphigoid patients (n = 11), revealing a neutrophil-predominant pattern, with mixed neutrophil–eosinophil infiltrates in 81% of cases, which contrasted with the eosinophil-rich infiltrates typical of BP. Infiltrating neutrophils expressed C5aR1 and C5aR2. Complement fixation test (CFT) of patient sera demonstrated C3c deposition at the BMZ in 40% (20/50) of anti-p200 pemphigoid cases and 87% (13/15) of BP cases. Patients in both cohorts could be stratified into high, mild, and non-complement-fixating groups. Pharmacological inhibition of C1s (sutimlimab), C3 (compstatin), C5 (tesidolumab), or C5aR1 (avacopan) significantly blocked C3c or C5 deposition in vitro. These findings indicate that selective blockade of the classical, alternative, or terminal complement pathways effectively prevents BMZ complement deposition, highlighting pathway-specific complement inhibition as a potential therapeutic strategy for anti-p200 pemphigoid.
- 23 January 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomolecules
- Vol. 16 (2) , 182
Open AccessSelective Complement Inhibition in Anti-p200 Pemphigoid: Immune Infiltrate Profiles and Therapeutic Implications Compared to Bullous Pemphigoid
Anti-p200 pemphigoid is an autoimmune blistering disease (AIBD) caused by autoantibodies against laminin β4 and/or γ1, and clinically resembles bullous pemphigoid (BP) as well as the inflammatory variant of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA). All three diseases show IgG and/or C3 deposition along the cutaneous basement membrane zone (BMZ). Although complement activation is central to BP and EBA pathogenesis, its role in anti-p200 pemphigoid remains unclear. To investigate this, we analyzed inflammatory infiltrates in lesional and perilesional skin from anti-p200 pemphigoid patients (n = 11), revealing a neutrophil-predominant pattern, with mixed neutrophil–eosinophil infiltrates in 81% of cases, which contrasted with the eosinophil-rich infiltrates typical of BP. Infiltrating neutrophils expressed C5aR1 and C5aR2. Complement fixation test (CFT) of patient sera demonstrated C3c deposition at the BMZ in 40% (20/50) of anti-p200 pemphigoid cases and 87% (13/15) of BP cases. Patients in both cohorts could be stratified into high, mild, and non-complement-fixating groups. Pharmacological inhibition of C1s (sutimlimab), C3 (compstatin), C5 (tesidolumab), or C5aR1 (avacopan) significantly blocked C3c or C5 deposition in vitro. These findings indicate that selective blockade of the classical, alternative, or terminal complement pathways effectively prevents BMZ complement deposition, highlighting pathway-specific complement inhibition as a potential therapeutic strategy for anti-p200 pemphigoid.
- Open Access
Localization of Lesions in Autoimmune Blistering Diseases Is Independent of Site-Specific Target Antigen Expression
Autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs) involve autoantibodies targeting proteins in the epidermal/epithelial desmosome (pemphigus) or basement membrane zone (pemphigoid). Despite widespread antigen distribution, lesions exhibit a scattered involvement pattern. This study maps the frequency/severity of AIBD lesions on various body parts and investigates whether differential antigen expression contributes to specific predilection sites. We analyzed affected sites presenting blisters/erosions, erythematous/urticarial lesions, and mucosal lesions in bullous pemphigoid (BP-cohort 1, n = 65; BP-cohort 2, n = 119), pemphigus vulgaris (PV, n = 67), and pemphigus foliaceus (PF, n = 20) patients. To assess antigen expression, we conducted indirect immunofluorescence (IF) staining of 11 AIBD antigens from 13 anatomical sites of 10 body donors without AIBD. In BP, blisters/erosions and erythematous/urticarial lesions predominantly affected arms and legs, while PV/PF patients exhibited frequent involvement of buccal mucosa and back, respectively. IF staining identified significant regional differences in BP180, BP230, and integrin β4 expression, although these variations did not correlate with a higher lesion frequency/severity. Other antigens showed consistent expression across all regions. Our findings suggest that predilection sites for BP and PV/PF are largely unaffected by regional variations in antigen expression but may be influenced by factors like microbiota, mechanical stress, sunlight exposure, local immunity, or genetics.
Open AccessLocalization of Lesions in Autoimmune Blistering Diseases Is Independent of Site-Specific Target Antigen Expression
Autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs) involve autoantibodies targeting proteins in the epidermal/epithelial desmosome (pemphigus) or basement membrane zone (pemphigoid). Despite widespread antigen distribution, lesions exhibit a scattered involvement pattern. This study maps the frequency/severity of AIBD lesions on various body parts and investigates whether differential antigen expression contributes to specific predilection sites. We analyzed affected sites presenting blisters/erosions, erythematous/urticarial lesions, and mucosal lesions in bullous pemphigoid (BP-cohort 1, n = 65; BP-cohort 2, n = 119), pemphigus vulgaris (PV, n = 67), and pemphigus foliaceus (PF, n = 20) patients. To assess antigen expression, we conducted indirect immunofluorescence (IF) staining of 11 AIBD antigens from 13 anatomical sites of 10 body donors without AIBD. In BP, blisters/erosions and erythematous/urticarial lesions predominantly affected arms and legs, while PV/PF patients exhibited frequent involvement of buccal mucosa and back, respectively. IF staining identified significant regional differences in BP180, BP230, and integrin β4 expression, although these variations did not correlate with a higher lesion frequency/severity. Other antigens showed consistent expression across all regions. Our findings suggest that predilection sites for BP and PV/PF are largely unaffected by regional variations in antigen expression but may be influenced by factors like microbiota, mechanical stress, sunlight exposure, local immunity, or genetics.
- Open Access
- 12 December 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Localization of Lesions in Autoimmune Blistering Diseases Is Independent of Site-Specific Target Antigen Expression
Autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBD) involve autoantibodies targeting proteins in the epidermal/epithelial desmosome (pemphigus) or basement membrane zone (pemphigoid). Despite widespread antigen distribution, lesions exhibit a scattered involvement pattern. This study maps the frequency/severity of AIBD lesions in various body parts and investigates whether differential antigen expression contributes to specific predilection sites. We analyzed affected sites presenting blisters/erosions, erythematous/urticarial lesions, and mucosal lesions in bullous pemphigoid (BP-cohort 1, n=65; BP-cohort 2, n=119), pemphigus vulgaris (PV, n=67), and pemphigus foliaceus (PF, n=20) patients. To assess antigen expression, we conducted indirect immunofluorescence (IF) staining of 11 AIBD antigens from 13 anatomical sites of 10 body donors without AIBD. In BP, blisters/erosions and erythematous/urticarial lesions predominantly affected arms and legs, while PV/PF patients exhibited frequent involvement of buccal mucosa and back, respectively. IF staining identified significant regional differences in BP180, BP230, and integrin β4 expression, although these variations did not correlate with a higher lesion frequency/severity. Other antigens showed consistent expression across all regions. Our findings suggest that predilection sites for BP and PV/PF are largely unaffected by regional variations in antigen expression but may be influenced by factors like microbiota, mechanical stress, sunlight exposure, local immunity, or genetics.
- 12 December 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Open AccessLocalization of Lesions in Autoimmune Blistering Diseases Is Independent of Site-Specific Target Antigen Expression
Autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBD) involve autoantibodies targeting proteins in the epidermal/epithelial desmosome (pemphigus) or basement membrane zone (pemphigoid). Despite widespread antigen distribution, lesions exhibit a scattered involvement pattern. This study maps the frequency/severity of AIBD lesions in various body parts and investigates whether differential antigen expression contributes to specific predilection sites. We analyzed affected sites presenting blisters/erosions, erythematous/urticarial lesions, and mucosal lesions in bullous pemphigoid (BP-cohort 1, n=65; BP-cohort 2, n=119), pemphigus vulgaris (PV, n=67), and pemphigus foliaceus (PF, n=20) patients. To assess antigen expression, we conducted indirect immunofluorescence (IF) staining of 11 AIBD antigens from 13 anatomical sites of 10 body donors without AIBD. In BP, blisters/erosions and erythematous/urticarial lesions predominantly affected arms and legs, while PV/PF patients exhibited frequent involvement of buccal mucosa and back, respectively. IF staining identified significant regional differences in BP180, BP230, and integrin β4 expression, although these variations did not correlate with a higher lesion frequency/severity. Other antigens showed consistent expression across all regions. Our findings suggest that predilection sites for BP and PV/PF are largely unaffected by regional variations in antigen expression but may be influenced by factors like microbiota, mechanical stress, sunlight exposure, local immunity, or genetics.