Raiane Eunice Santos Fernandes
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Raiane Eunice Santos Fernandes has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Caroline Oliveira Gois
The GREAT Group (GRupo de Estudos em ATividade física), Aracaju, Brazil
1 shared publication - Fabio Gomes Rocha
Federal University of Sergipe
1 shared publication - Lino Sérgio Rocha Conceição
Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe (Universidade Federal de Sergipe - UFS), Aracaju, Brazil
1 shared publication - Mansueto Gomes Neto
UFBA
1 shared publication - Marcos Cesar Barbosa dos Santos
Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristovão, Brazil
1 shared publication - Michel dos Santos Soares
Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Brazil
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 5 November 2024
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 519-525
Increasing Test Coverage by Automating BDD Tests in Proofs of Concepts (POCs) using LLM
- 5 November 2024
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 519-525
Open AccessIncreasing Test Coverage by Automating BDD Tests in Proofs of Concepts (POCs) using LLM
- Open Access
- 1 January 2021
- Published by Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular in Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 36 (1) , 86-93
Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Aerobic Capacity and Heart Rate Control of Heart Transplant Recipients: a Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Heart transplantation (HTx) is the gold standard procedure for selected individuals with refractory heart failure. Highintensity interval training (HIIT) is safe and allows patients to exercise in high intensity for longer time when compared to moderateintensity continuous training (MICT). The primary aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis about the effect of HIIT compared to MICT on exercise capacity, peak heart rate, and heart rate reserve in HTx recipients. Secondarily, we pooled data comparing MICT and no exercise training in these patients. This systematic review followed the standardization of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metaanalyses statement and the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. We presented the treatment effects of HIIT on the outcomes of interest as mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Metaanalysis was performed using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method. HIIT improved peak oxygen consumption (peakVO2) (MD = 2.1; 95% CI 1.1, 3.1; P<0.0001), peak heart rate (MD = 3.4; 95% CI 0.8, 5.9; P=0.009), and heart rate reserve (MD = 4.8; 95% CI -0.05, 9.6; P=0.05) compared to MICT. Improvements on peakVO2 (MD = 3.5; 95% CI 2.3, 4.7; P<0.00001) and peak heart rate (MD = 5.6; 95% CI 1.6, 9.6; P=0.006) were found comparing HIIT and no exercise training. Current available evidence suggests that HIIT leads to improvements on peakVO2, peak heart rate, and heart rate reserve compared to MICT in HTx recipients. However, the superiority of HIIT should be tested in isocaloric protocols.
- 1 January 2021
- Published by Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular in Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 36 (1) , 86-93
Open AccessEffect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Aerobic Capacity and Heart Rate Control of Heart Transplant Recipients: a Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Heart transplantation (HTx) is the gold standard procedure for selected individuals with refractory heart failure. Highintensity interval training (HIIT) is safe and allows patients to exercise in high intensity for longer time when compared to moderateintensity continuous training (MICT). The primary aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis about the effect of HIIT compared to MICT on exercise capacity, peak heart rate, and heart rate reserve in HTx recipients. Secondarily, we pooled data comparing MICT and no exercise training in these patients. This systematic review followed the standardization of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metaanalyses statement and the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. We presented the treatment effects of HIIT on the outcomes of interest as mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Metaanalysis was performed using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method. HIIT improved peak oxygen consumption (peakVO2) (MD = 2.1; 95% CI 1.1, 3.1; P<0.0001), peak heart rate (MD = 3.4; 95% CI 0.8, 5.9; P=0.009), and heart rate reserve (MD = 4.8; 95% CI -0.05, 9.6; P=0.05) compared to MICT. Improvements on peakVO2 (MD = 3.5; 95% CI 2.3, 4.7; P<0.00001) and peak heart rate (MD = 5.6; 95% CI 1.6, 9.6; P=0.006) were found comparing HIIT and no exercise training. Current available evidence suggests that HIIT leads to improvements on peakVO2, peak heart rate, and heart rate reserve compared to MICT in HTx recipients. However, the superiority of HIIT should be tested in isocaloric protocols.