MBMark F. A. Bierhuizen

Mark F. A. Bierhuizen

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Mark F. A. Bierhuizen has a total of 17 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Atrial electrophysiological properties of normothermic ex-situ perfused hearts donated after circulatory death

    by Mark F.A. Bierhuizen, Hongxian Xiang, Mathijs van Schie, Jorik H. Amesz, Sanne J.J. Langmuur, Paul Knops, Olivier C. Manintveld, Jolanda Kluin, Yannick J.H.J. Taverne, Natasja M.S. de Groot

  • Open Access

    Electrical conditioning strategies in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury

    by Mark F.A. Bierhuizen, Jorik H. Amesz, Olivier C. Manintveld, Jolanda Kluin, Natasja M.S. de Groot, Yannick J.H.J. Taverne


  • Open Access

    Acute Biomechanical Effects of Cardiac Contractility Modulation in Living Myocardial Slices from End-Stage Heart Failure Patients

    by Mark F. A. Bierhuizen, Jorik H. Amesz, Sanne J. J. Langmuur, Bobby Lam, Paul Knops, Kevin M. Veen, Olivier C. Manintveld, Jolanda Kluin, Natasja M. S. de Groot, Yannick J. H. J. Taverne

    Proof-of-concept to determine the direct biomechanical effects of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) on living myocardial slices (LMS) from patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). Left ventricular LMS from patients with end-stage HF were produced and cultured in a biomimetic system with mechanical loading and electrical stimulation. CCM stimulation (80 mA, 40 ms delay, 21 ms duration) enhanced maximum contractile force (CCM: 1229 µN (587–2658) vs. baseline: 1066 µN (529–2128), p = 0.05) and area under the contractile curve (CCM: 297 (151–562) vs. baseline: 243 (129–464), p = 0.05) but did not significantly impact contractile duration, time to peak, or time to relaxation. Increasing CCM stimulation delay, duration, and amplitude resulted in a higher fraction of LMS with a positive inotropic response. Furthermore, CCM attenuated the negative force-frequency relationship in HF-LMS. CCM stimulation enhanced contractile force in HF-LMS. The fraction of LMS exerting a positive inotropic response to CCM increased with increasing delay, duration, and amplitude settings, suggesting that personalizing stimulation parameters could optimize the beneficial effects of CCM. CCM is a novel device-based therapy that may improve contractile function, ejection fraction, functional outcomes, and quality of life in patients with heart failure. However, continuous efforts are needed to identify true responders to CCM therapy, understand the exact mechanisms, and optimize the contractile response to CCM stimulation. The present study revealed that CCM enhanced the contractile force of HF-LMS in a stimulation setting-dependent manner, reaching a larger fraction of the myocardium while increasing delay, duration, and amplitude. This understanding may contribute to the individualization of CCM stimulation settings.


  • Open Access

    Acute Biomechanical Effects of Cardiac Contractility Modulation in Living Myocardial Slices From End- Stage Heart Failure Patients

    by Mark F.A. Bierhuizen, Jorik H. Amesz, Sanne J.J. Langmuur, Bobby Lam, Paul Knops, Kevin M. Veen, Olivier C. Manintveld, Jolanda Kluin, Natasja M.S. de Groot, Yannick J.H.J. Taverne

    1.1 Aims: Proof-of-concept to determine the direct biomechanical effects of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) on living myocardial slices (LMS) from patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). 1.2 Methods and results: Left ventricular LMS from patients with end-stage HF were produced and cultured in a biomimetic system with mechanical loading and electrical stimulation. CCM stimulation (80 mA, 40 ms delay, 21 ms duration) enhanced maximum contractile force (CCM: 1229 µN (587 – 2658) vs. baseline: 1066 µN (529 – 2128), p = 0.05) and area under the contractile curve (CCM: 297 (151 – 562) vs. baseline: 243 (129 – 464), p = 0.05), but did not significantly impact contractile duration, time to peak or time to relaxation. Increasing CCM stimulation delay, duration and amplitude resulted in a higher fraction of LMS with a positive inotropic response. Furthermore, CCM attenuated the negative force-frequency relationship in HF-LMS. 1.3 Conclusion: CCM stimulation enhanced contractile force in HF-LMS. The fraction of LMS exerting a positive inotropic response to CCM increased with increasing delay, duration and amplitude settings, suggesting that personalizing stimulation parameters could optimize the beneficial effects of CCM. 1.4 Translational perspective CCM is a novel device-based therapy that may improve contractile function, ejection fraction, functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with heart failure. However, continuous efforts are needed to identify true responders to CCM therapy, understand the exact mechanisms and to optimize the contractile response to CCM stimulation. The present study revealed that CCM enhanced contractile force of HF-LMS in a stimulation setting dependent manner, reaching a larger fraction of the myocardium while increasing delay, duration and amplitude. This understanding may contribute to the individualization of CCM stimulation settings.