Elysandra Marie Solis

Implantable microelectrode arrays (MEAs) enable the recording of electrical activity from cortical neurons for applications that include brain–machine interfaces. However, MEAs show reduced recording capabilities under chronic implantation conditions. This has largely been attributed to the brain’s foreign body response, which is marked by neuroinflammation and gliosis in the immediate vicinity of the MEA implantation site. This has prompted the development of novel MEAs with either coatings or architectures that aim to reduce the tissue response. The present study examines the comparative performance of multi-shank planar, silicon-based devices and low-flexural-rigidity amorphous silicon carbide (a-SiC) MEAs that have a similar architecture but differ with respect to the shank cross-sectional area. Data from a-SiC arrays were previously reported in a prior study from our group. In a manner consistent with the prior work, larger cross-sectional area silicon-based arrays were implanted in the motor cortex of female Sprague-Dawley rats and weekly recordings were made for 16 weeks after implantation. Single unit metrics from the recordings were compared over the implantation period between the device types. Overall, the expression of single units measured from a-SiC devices was significantly higher than for silicon-based MEAs throughout the implantation period. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated reduced neuroinflammation and gliosis around the a-SiC MEAs compared to silicon-based devices. Our findings demonstrate that the a-SiC MEAs with a smaller shank cross-sectional area can record single unit activity with more stability and exhibit a reduced inflammatory response compared to the silicon-based device employed in this study.

Implantable microelectrode arrays (MEAs) enable the recording of electrical activity from cortical neurons for applications that include brain machine interfaces. However, MEAs show reduced recording capabilities under chronic implantation conditions. This has largely been attributed to the brain’s foreign body response, which is marked by neuroinflammation and gliosis in the immediate vicinity of the MEA implantation site. This has prompted the development of novel MEAs with either coatings or architectures that aim to reduce the tissue response. The present study examines the comparative performance of multi-shank planar, silicon-based devices and low flexural rigidity amorphous silicon carbide (a-SiC) MEAs that have a similar architecture but differ with respect to shank cross-sectional area. Data from a-SiC arrays were previously reported in a prior study from our group. In a manner consistent with the prior work, larger cross-sectional area silicon-based arrays were implanted in the motor cortex of female Sprague-Dawley rats and weekly recordings were made for 16 weeks after implantation. Single unit metrics from the recordings were compared over the implantation period between the device types. Overall, the expression of single units measured from a-SiC devices was significantly higher than for silicon-based MEAs throughout the implantation period. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated reduced neuroinflammation and gliosis around the a-SiC MEAs compared to silicon-based devices. Our findings demonstrate that the a-SiC MEAs with smaller shank cross-sectional area can record single unit activity with more stability and exhibit a reduced inflammatory response compared to the silicon-based device employed in this study.