Margret Selting
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Margret Selting has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Auli Hakulinen
1 shared publication- Dagmar Barth-Weingarten
University of Potsdam
1 shared publication - Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
University of Helsinki
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 13 August 2024
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company
- p. 1-18
Introducing new perspectives in interactional linguistic research
Since Interactional Linguistics (IL) is still a relatively recent approach to the study of language in talk-in-interaction, this introduction will first briefly outline how IL came about, what its current state is, and what it is characterized by. Then we will go into more detail on the new research perspectives that are highlighted by the contributions to this collection.
- 13 August 2024
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company
- p. 1-18
Introducing new perspectives in interactional linguistic research
Since Interactional Linguistics (IL) is still a relatively recent approach to the study of language in talk-in-interaction, this introduction will first briefly outline how IL came about, what its current state is, and what it is characterized by. Then we will go into more detail on the new research perspectives that are highlighted by the contributions to this collection.
- 30 November 2011
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company
- p. 131-159
Prosody and unit-construction in an ethnic style
This paper presents some results of the projects on Turkish German that we have carried out at the University of Potsdam, Germany, starting from 2004. Our empirical data from telephone conversations between young people of Turkish-German background from Berlin show that prosody plays an important role in the constitution of their ethnic style. In particular, prosodic phrasing is used for the construction of short turn-constructional units (TCUs) and/or the separation of longer syntactic-semantic units into several short prosodic units. The latter is achieved both by pre- and post-positioning syntactic constituents in relation to their host syntactic clauses as well as by juxtapositioning short clauses and phrases. In many cases, information that in colloquial German would be phrased in one single turn-constructional unit, with co-occurring syntactic and prosodic units, is split up into several short prosodic units in Turkish German. While the phonetic and prosodic cues that make the beginning of new units recognizable for the recipient seem to be identical for colloquial and Turkish German, prosodic units in Turkish German have a relation to syntactic and semantic units or domains that is different from colloquial German. The analyses that I present in my paper have been attained on the basis of natural data that have been subjected to a combination of research methods: auditory and acoustic phonetic analysis as well as conversation analysis and interactional-linguistic description. I will present both a structural and a functional analysis of selected utterances and data extracts. The features that I will describe are some of the most important ones to constitute Turkish German as a style of speaking. This style, however, is not displayed throughout the conversations, but only realized in particular sequential environments. It is used as a discourse-pragmatic focussing strategy and, in particular, for the contextualization of the dramatization and the high points/climaxes in story tellings.
- 30 November 2011
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company
- p. 131-159
Prosody and unit-construction in an ethnic style
This paper presents some results of the projects on Turkish German that we have carried out at the University of Potsdam, Germany, starting from 2004. Our empirical data from telephone conversations between young people of Turkish-German background from Berlin show that prosody plays an important role in the constitution of their ethnic style. In particular, prosodic phrasing is used for the construction of short turn-constructional units (TCUs) and/or the separation of longer syntactic-semantic units into several short prosodic units. The latter is achieved both by pre- and post-positioning syntactic constituents in relation to their host syntactic clauses as well as by juxtapositioning short clauses and phrases. In many cases, information that in colloquial German would be phrased in one single turn-constructional unit, with co-occurring syntactic and prosodic units, is split up into several short prosodic units in Turkish German. While the phonetic and prosodic cues that make the beginning of new units recognizable for the recipient seem to be identical for colloquial and Turkish German, prosodic units in Turkish German have a relation to syntactic and semantic units or domains that is different from colloquial German. The analyses that I present in my paper have been attained on the basis of natural data that have been subjected to a combination of research methods: auditory and acoustic phonetic analysis as well as conversation analysis and interactional-linguistic description. I will present both a structural and a functional analysis of selected utterances and data extracts. The features that I will describe are some of the most important ones to constitute Turkish German as a style of speaking. This style, however, is not displayed throughout the conversations, but only realized in particular sequential environments. It is used as a discourse-pragmatic focussing strategy and, in particular, for the contextualization of the dramatization and the high points/climaxes in story tellings.
- 10 December 2010
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company
- p. 3-40
Prosody in interaction
This paper gives an overview of the field of prosody in interaction, classifying research areas and questions as they have developed since the start of the field in the mid 1980s. The overview is organized by the following questions:1. What is prosody?2. Why should scholars and students concerned with the analysis of conversation or interaction study prosody?3. Why should phoneticians and phonologists study the forms and uses and/or functions of prosody in interaction?4. Who studies prosody in interaction currently in what way?5. What are our current research questions and our future tasks in research in prosody?6. What are the challenges of research in prosody and interaction that we still need to come to terms with?
- 10 December 2010
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company
- p. 3-40
Prosody in interaction
This paper gives an overview of the field of prosody in interaction, classifying research areas and questions as they have developed since the start of the field in the mid 1980s. The overview is organized by the following questions:1. What is prosody?2. Why should scholars and students concerned with the analysis of conversation or interaction study prosody?3. Why should phoneticians and phonologists study the forms and uses and/or functions of prosody in interaction?4. Who studies prosody in interaction currently in what way?5. What are our current research questions and our future tasks in research in prosody?6. What are the challenges of research in prosody and interaction that we still need to come to terms with?
- 28 September 2005
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company
- p. 17-44
Syntax and prosody as methods for the construction and identification of turn-constructional units in conversation
- 28 September 2005
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company
- p. 17-44
Syntax and prosody as methods for the construction and identification of turn-constructional units in conversation
- 30 November 2004
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company
- p. 201-231
The 'upward' staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacular
- 30 November 2004
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company
- p. 201-231
The 'upward' staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacular
- 1 January 2001
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company
- p. 229-258
Fragments of units as deviant cases of unit production in conversational talk
- 1 January 2001
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company
- p. 229-258
Fragments of units as deviant cases of unit production in conversational talk
- 1 January 2001
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company
- p. 1-22
Introducing Interactional Linguistics
- 1 January 2001
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company
- p. 1-22
Introducing Interactional Linguistics