Anusha Agarwal

Solid-organ malignancies represent a significant disease burden and remain one of the leading causes of death globally. In the past few decades, the rapid evolution of imaging modalities has shifted the paradigm towards image-based precision medicine, especially in the care of patients with solid-organ malignancies. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) is one such semi-quantitative parameter obtained from positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) that has been shown to have significant implications in the clinical oncology setting. Across various solid tumor malignancies, including lung cancer, head and neck cancer, breast cancer, esophageal cancer, and colorectal cancer, the current literature has demonstrated an association between MTV and various clinical outcomes. MTV may be used in conjunction with several existing and established clinical parameters to help inform risk stratification and treatment strategies and predict outcomes in cancer. Optimizing such volumetric parameters is paramount for advancing efforts to advance cancer care for our patients. While such advancements are made, it is important to investigate and address the limitations of MTV, including variability in terms of measurement methods, a lack of standardized cut-off values, and the impact of inherent tumor heterogeneity. Despite these limitations, which can precipitate challenges in standardization, MTV as a prognostic factor has great potential and opens an avenue for the future integration of technology into an image-based precision medicine model of care for cancer patients. This article serves as a narrative review and explores the utility and limitations of PET-MTV in various settings of solid-organ malignancy.