Ahmet Burak Satılmış

Background and Objectives: This study compares the biomechanical performance of a new-generation implant designed for patella fracture fixation with the traditional tension band method. Its goal is to assess fracture fixation’s stability and the new implant’s potential advantages in reducing complications such as skin irritation, pain, and implant failure. Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, 20 calf patellae were divided into two groups. The first group was treated with the traditional tension band method, while the second group received the new-generation implant, designed using finite element analysis (FEA) for optimization. Both groups underwent biomechanical testing with axial forces at a 45° flexion angle to simulate real-life load conditions. The maximum forces at which mechanical insufficiency occurred were recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS for statistical comparison. Results: Finite element analysis revealed that the new-generation implant provided better fracture line stability than the tension band method under applied forces. In the biomechanical tests, the maximum force at which mechanical insufficiency occurred was significantly higher in the new-generation implant group (1130 ± 222 N) compared to the tension band method group (680.5 ± 185.4 N), with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.008). The new implant demonstrated superior fixation, with better resistance to distraction forces. Conclusions: The new-generation implant offers enhanced biomechanical stability compared to the traditional tension band method, particularly regarding fixation strength under applied forces. This study supports the potential of the new implant to improve fixation stability and reduce common complications associated with patella fracture surgeries. Further testing in more extensive human cadaver studies is recommended to confirm these findings and assess long-term clinical outcomes.

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in adult patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) presents unique surgical challenges due to altered hip anatomy and biomechanics. One of the most critical factors influencing surgical success is correcting femoral anteversion. This study evaluates the effects of different anteversion corrections (increased, unchanged, and decreased) during THA on clinical outcomes in adult Crowe type 3-4 DDH patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 130 patients who underwent THA with anteversion correction between 2008 and 2017 at a tertiary university hospital. Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 (increased anteversion), Group 2 (unchanged anteversion), and Group 3 (decreased anteversion). Clinical outcomes were assessed using AOFAS and Lysholm scores, Q-angle measurements, and physical examinations, while radiological evaluations were performed to determine implant stability and complications. Results: Postoperative assessments show that increased anteversion is associated with higher rates of instability, knee dysfunction, and pain. Group 1 had significantly lower AOFAS scores (p < 0.001) and fell due to rotational deformity (25.6%). Group 2 exhibited the best clinical outcomes, with the lowest rates of instability and the highest functional scores. Group 3 had moderate functional improvements but a higher dislocation rate (17.1%) than Group 2. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that excessive changes in femoral anteversion during THA, remarkably increasing it, may negatively impact clinical outcomes by causing instability and pain. Preserving the anteversion angle as much as possible is the most favorable approach for optimizing functional recovery and implant stability. Further large-scale, long-term studies are required to confirm these findings and refine surgical strategies for DDH patients undergoing THA.

Background and Objectives: Shoulder pain, mainly involving rotator cuff tears, is a common type of musculoskeletal pain that significantly impairs quality of life. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has become the gold standard for treating symptomatic, full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Double-row repair techniques are widely used because of their superior fixation and healing results. However, fewer implants may reduce treatment costs and raise questions about the impact on clinical outcomes and re-tear rates. This study compares the functional outcomes and re-tear rates of two transosseous-like double-row repair techniques: one anchor and one push lock (Group 1), and two anchors and two push locks (Group 2). Materials and Methods: A prospective, randomized, single-blind study was conducted on 53 patients undergoing arthroscopic repair for crescent-shaped rotator cuff tears (3–5 cm). Before surgery and 24 months after surgery, patients were evaluated for shoulder function using Constant–Murley scores and shoulder abduction angles. MRI was used to assess re-tear rates. Results: Both groups showed significant postoperative improvement in Constant scores (Group 1: 84.1; Group 2: 84.0; p > 0.05). Re-tear rates were slightly higher in Group 1 (23.1%) than in Group 2 (18.5%), but this was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Shoulder abduction angles improved similarly between groups, with no significant difference in outcome. Despite higher costs and longer operative times, the two-anchor technique provided more stable fixation, but its functional outcomes were comparable to the single-anchor method. Conclusions: Using fewer implants in a double-row repair provides comparable functional outcomes and re-tear rates, and offers surgeons a cost-effective alternative, especially at the beginning of their learning curve. However, the two-anchor technique may be more beneficial in cases requiring improved mechanical stability. These findings provide valuable information to balance cost and effectiveness in rotator cuff repair.

Lateral humeral condyle (LHC) fractures are frequent elbow injuries in children, and if neglected or inadequately managed, they can lead to complications such as cubitus valgus deformity, ulnar nerve issues, and instability of the elbow joint. This case report presents a 20-year-old male with bilateral neglected LHC nonunion, leading to severe cubitus valgus deformity (45° on the left, 41° on the right) and ulnar neuropathy. The patient underwent a combination of 35° closed wedge osteotomy and anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve (ATUN) using a posterior approach. Fixation was achieved with locking plates. Postoperatively, significant improvement in ulnar nerve function, full elbow motion, and satisfactory cosmetic results were observed. Complete osteotomy healing occurred at nine months, with preparations for contralateral surgery underway. The presence of fractures in both elbows with identical deformities makes this case unique in the literature. This case highlights the efficacy of combining closed wedge osteotomy with ATUN in a single procedure, offering a practical, less complex solution for neglected LHC nonunion with favorable outcomes in deformity correction and nerve function restoration.

Background and Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate a newly designed semicircular implant for the fixation of Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. To determine its strength and clinical applicability, the new implant was compared biomechanically with conventional fixation methods, such as lateral locking plate fixation and a plate combined with cerclage wires. Materials and Methods: Fifteen synthetic femur models were used in this biomechanical study. A Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic fracture was simulated by osteotomy 5 mm distal to the femoral stem. The models were divided into three groups: Group I (lateral locking plate fixation), Group II (lateral locking plate with cerclage wires), and Group III (new semicircular implant system). All fixation methods were subjected to axial loading, lateral bending, and torsional force testing using an MTS biomechanical testing device. Failure load and displacement were measured to assess stability. Results: The semicircular implant (Group III) demonstrated a significantly higher failure load (778.8 ± 74.089 N) compared to the lateral plate (Group I: 467 ± 68.165 N) and plate with cerclage wires (Group II: 652.4 ± 65.474 N; p < 0.001). The new implant also exhibited superior stability under axial, lateral bending, and torsional forces. The failure load for Group III was more robust, with fractures occurring at the screw level rather than plate or screw detachment. Conclusions: Compared to traditional fixation methods, the newly designed semicircular implant demonstrated superior biomechanical performance in stabilizing Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures. It withstood higher physiological loads, offered better structural stability, and could be an alternative to existing fixation systems in clinical practice. Further studies, including cadaveric and in vivo trials, are recommended to confirm these results and assess the long-term clinical outcomes.