Ana Julia Hidalgo-Bravo has a total of 19 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    3D Printing and Virtual Surgical Planning in Craniofacial and Thoracic Surgery: Applications to Personalised Medicine

    by Freddy Patricio Moncayo-Matute, Jhonatan Heriberto Vázquez-Albornoz, Efrén Vázquez-Silva, Ana Julia Hidalgo-Bravo, Paúl Bolívar Torres-Jara, Diana Patricia Moya-Loaiza

    Background/Objectives: The application of additive manufacturing in medicine, and specifically in personalised medicine, has achieved notable development. This article aims to present the results and benefits of applying a comprehensive methodology to simulate, plan, and manufacture customised three-dimensional medical prosthetic devices for use in surgery to restore bone structures with congenital and acquired malformations. Methods: To digitally reconstruct a bone structure in three dimensions from a medical image, a segmentation process is developed to correlate the anatomical model. Then, this model is filtered using a post-processing step to generate stereolithography (STL) files, which are rendered using specialised software. The segmentation of tomographic images is achieved by the specific intensity selection, facilitating the analysis of compact and soft tissues within the anatomical region of interest. With the help of a thresholding algorithm, a three-dimensional digital model of the anatomical structure is obtained, ready for printing the required structure. Results: The described cases demonstrate that the use of anatomical test models, cutting guides, and customised prostheses reduces surgical time and hospital stay, and achieves better aesthetic and functional results. Using materials such as polylactic acid (PLA) for presurgical models, appropriate resins for cutting guides, and biocompatible materials such as polyether ether ketone (PEEK) or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) for prostheses, the described improvements are achieved. Conclusions: The achievements attained demonstrate the feasibility of applying these techniques, their advantages and their accessibility in Ecuador. They also reinforce the ideas of personalised medicine in the search for medical treatments and procedures tailored to the needs of each patient.


  • Open Access

    3D Printing and Virtual Surgical Planning in Craniofacial and Thoracic Surgery: Success Cases

    by Freddy Patricio Moncayo-Matute, Jhonatan Heriberto Vázquez-Albornoz, Efrén Vázquez-Silva, Ana Julia Hidalgo-Bravo, Paúl Bolívar Torres-Jara, Diana Patricia Moya-Loaiza

    This paper describes the results and benefits of applying a comprehensive methodology for simulating and planning surgeries related to the restoration of bone structures damaged by various types of pathologies, through seven clinical success cases. Pre-surgery simulations are performed using 3D printed anatomical test models. In addition, restorations or bone transformations are supported by customised implants manufactured for each case, including customised cutting guides as well. Appropriate polymeric materials are used, and Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) is applied as the main additive manufacturing technique to obtain the medical devices. The results demonstrate the feasibility of applying such techniques, their advantages and the possibilities of access to them in Ecuador.


  • Next Generation Phenotyping and Synthetic Faces in Coffin Siris Syndrome

    by Quentin Hennocq, Olivier Lienhard, Dipesh Rao, Jeanne Amiel, Ludovic Benichou, Thomas Bongibault, Ana‐Julia Bravo Hidalgo, Valérie Cormier‐Daire, Stanislas Lyonnet, Arnaud Picard, et al.

    Diagnostic wandering and delayed management are major issues in rare diseases. Here, we report a new Next‐Generation Phenotyping (NGP) model for diagnosing Coffin Siris syndrome (CSS) on clinical photographs among controls and distinguish the different genotypes. This retrospective and prospective study, conducted from 1998 to 2023, included frontal and lateral pictures of confirmed CSS. After automatic placement of landmarks, geometric features extraction using procrustes superimposition, and textural features using a gray‐level co‐occurrence matrix (GLCM), we incorporated age, gender, and ethnicity and used XGboost (eXtreme Gradient Boosting) for classification. An independent validation set of confirmed CSS cases from centers in Bangalore (India) and Tbilissi (Georgia) was used. We then tested for differences between genotype groups. Finally, we introduced a new approach for generating synthetic faces of children with CSS. The training set included over 196 photographs from our center, corresponding to 58 patients (29 controls, 29 CSS). We distinguished CSS from controls in the independent validation group with an accuracy of 90.0% (73.5%–97.9%, p = 0.001). We found no facial shape difference between the different genotypes.