Seungwon Ihm
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Seungwon Ihm has a total of 22 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Abdallatif Satti Abdalrhman
Water Technologies Innovation Institute and Research Advancement (WTIIRA), Saudi Water Authority (SWA), Al-Jubail 31951, Saudi Arabia
2 shared publications - Christopher Michael Fellows
University of New England
2 shared publications - Aron K. Beke
Advanced Membranes and Porous Materials Center, Physical Science and Engineering Division (PSE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
1 shared publication - Dong Suk Han
Center for Advanced Materials, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
1 shared publication Eslam Alwaznani
1 shared publication- Eslam S. B. Alwaznani
Water Technologies Innovation Institute and Research Advancement (WTIIRA), Saudi Water Authority (SWA), Al-Jubail 31951, Saudi Arabia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 May 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Desalination and Water Treatment
- Vol. 326
Transforming seawater brine into resources: A circular economy approach at the Haql brine mining plant
- 1 May 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Desalination and Water Treatment
- Vol. 326
Open AccessTransforming seawater brine into resources: A circular economy approach at the Haql brine mining plant
- Open Access
- 3 December 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Desalination and Water Treatment
- Vol. 325
Fuel efficiency and cost optimization in combined cycle power plant (CCPP)-integrated desalination systems: A comparative study of MSF, MED, and SWRO
- 3 December 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Desalination and Water Treatment
- Vol. 325
Open AccessFuel efficiency and cost optimization in combined cycle power plant (CCPP)-integrated desalination systems: A comparative study of MSF, MED, and SWRO
- Open Access
Process Simulation of High-Pressure Nanofiltration (HPNF) for Membrane Brine Concentration (MBC): A Pilot-Scale Case Study
The growing demand for sustainable water management solutions has prompted the development of membrane brine concentration (MBC) technologies, particularly in the context of desalination and minimum liquid discharge (MLD) applications. This study presents a simple model of high-pressure nanofiltration (HPNF) for MBC. The model integrates reverse osmosis (RO) transport equations with mass balance equations, thereby enabling acceptable predictions of water flux and total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration. Considering the limitations of the pilot plant data, the model showed reasonable accuracy in predicting flux and TDS, with R2 values above 0.99. The simulation results demonstrated that an increase in feed flow rate improves flux but raises specific energy consumption (SEC) and reduces recovery. In contrast, an increase in feed pressure results in an increased recovery and brine concentration. Increasing feed TDS decreases flux, recovery, and final brine TDS and increases SEC. Response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to optimize process performance across multiple criteria, optimizing flux, SEC, recovery, and final brine concentration. The optimal feed flow rate and pressure vary depending on the criteria in the improvement scenarios, underscoring the importance of systematic process improvement.
Open AccessProcess Simulation of High-Pressure Nanofiltration (HPNF) for Membrane Brine Concentration (MBC): A Pilot-Scale Case Study
The growing demand for sustainable water management solutions has prompted the development of membrane brine concentration (MBC) technologies, particularly in the context of desalination and minimum liquid discharge (MLD) applications. This study presents a simple model of high-pressure nanofiltration (HPNF) for MBC. The model integrates reverse osmosis (RO) transport equations with mass balance equations, thereby enabling acceptable predictions of water flux and total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration. Considering the limitations of the pilot plant data, the model showed reasonable accuracy in predicting flux and TDS, with R2 values above 0.99. The simulation results demonstrated that an increase in feed flow rate improves flux but raises specific energy consumption (SEC) and reduces recovery. In contrast, an increase in feed pressure results in an increased recovery and brine concentration. Increasing feed TDS decreases flux, recovery, and final brine TDS and increases SEC. Response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to optimize process performance across multiple criteria, optimizing flux, SEC, recovery, and final brine concentration. The optimal feed flow rate and pressure vary depending on the criteria in the improvement scenarios, underscoring the importance of systematic process improvement.