Jyothika Venkataswamy Reddy
Jyothika Venkataswamy Reddy has a total of 19 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Abhishek Kumar Mariswamy Arun Kumar
Department of Internal Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45458, USA
3 shared publications - Antony Arumairaj
Woodhull Medical Center, NYU Langone, Brooklyn, NY 11206, USA
3 shared publications - Dili Dhanani
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
3 shared publications - Divya Korpu
Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, WI 54703, USA
3 shared publications - Jayesh Mittal
Asante Rogue Regional Medical Center, Medford, OR 97504, USA
3 shared publications - Poojaben Dhorajiya
The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, United States; University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, United States; The University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, USA, USA
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 17 October 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Healthcare
- Vol. 14 (20) , 3490
Complications and Hospital Resource Utilization Associated with ECMO in COVID-19 ARDS with Acute Kidney Injury: Insights from United States National Inpatient Sample, 2020–2022
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), yet the impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on outcomes in this high-risk population remains unclear. Methods: We performed a retrospective, survey-weighted study using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2020–2022 to compare outcomes among adults hospitalized with COVID-19-associated ARDS and AKI managed with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) alone versus IMV and ECMO. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while secondary outcomes included renal replacement therapy (RRT), complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), and healthcare utilization. Results: Among 198,395 hospitalizations with COVID-19 ARDS complicated by AKI, 4730 received IMV and ECMO. ECMO use was not associated with statistically significantly lower adjusted in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.96, 95% CI 0.81–1.12). However, ECMO was associated with greater odds of RRT, intracranial hemorrhage, disseminated intravascular coagulation, cardiogenic shock, vasopressor use, tracheostomy, acute liver failure, deep vein thrombosis, ischemic stroke and ICU-acquired weakness. ECMO was also associated with longer LOS and higher hospitalization charges. Conclusions: Among hospitalizations with COVID-19-associated ARDS and AKI, ECMO was not associated with statistically significantly lower adjusted in-hospital mortality but was associated with markedly higher complication burden, longer hospitalization, and substantially greater healthcare resource utilization.
- 17 October 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Healthcare
- Vol. 14 (20) , 3490
Open AccessComplications and Hospital Resource Utilization Associated with ECMO in COVID-19 ARDS with Acute Kidney Injury: Insights from United States National Inpatient Sample, 2020–2022
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), yet the impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on outcomes in this high-risk population remains unclear. Methods: We performed a retrospective, survey-weighted study using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2020–2022 to compare outcomes among adults hospitalized with COVID-19-associated ARDS and AKI managed with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) alone versus IMV and ECMO. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while secondary outcomes included renal replacement therapy (RRT), complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), and healthcare utilization. Results: Among 198,395 hospitalizations with COVID-19 ARDS complicated by AKI, 4730 received IMV and ECMO. ECMO use was not associated with statistically significantly lower adjusted in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.96, 95% CI 0.81–1.12). However, ECMO was associated with greater odds of RRT, intracranial hemorrhage, disseminated intravascular coagulation, cardiogenic shock, vasopressor use, tracheostomy, acute liver failure, deep vein thrombosis, ischemic stroke and ICU-acquired weakness. ECMO was also associated with longer LOS and higher hospitalization charges. Conclusions: Among hospitalizations with COVID-19-associated ARDS and AKI, ECMO was not associated with statistically significantly lower adjusted in-hospital mortality but was associated with markedly higher complication burden, longer hospitalization, and substantially greater healthcare resource utilization.
- Open Access
- 11 August 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Complications and Hospital Resource Utilization Associated with ECMO in COVID-19 ARDS with Acute Kidney Injury: Insights from United States National Inpatient Sample, 2020–2022
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), yet the impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on outcomes in this high-risk population remains unclear. : Methods:We performed a retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2020–2022 to compare outcomes among adults hospitalized with COVID-19-associated ARDS and AKI managed with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) alone versus IMV and ECMO. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while secondary outcomes included renal replacement therapy (RRT), complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), and healthcare utilization. Results: Among 198,395 patients with COVID-19 ARDS complicated by AKI, 4,730 received IMV and ECMO. ECMO was not associated with reduced mortality after multivariable adjustment (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.96, 95% CI 0.81-1.12). However, ECMO was associated with greater odds of RRT, intracranial hemorrhage, disseminated intravascular coagulation, cardiogenic shock, vasopressor use, tracheostomy, acute liver failure, deep vein thrombosis, ischemic stroke and ICU-acquired weakness. ECMO was also associated with longer LOS and higher hospitalization costs. Conclusion: Among patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS and AKI, ECMO was not associated with a clear adjusted mortality benefit but was associated with markedly higher complication burden, longer hospitalization, and substantially greater healthcare resource utilization.
- 11 August 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Open AccessComplications and Hospital Resource Utilization Associated with ECMO in COVID-19 ARDS with Acute Kidney Injury: Insights from United States National Inpatient Sample, 2020–2022
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), yet the impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on outcomes in this high-risk population remains unclear. : Methods:We performed a retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2020–2022 to compare outcomes among adults hospitalized with COVID-19-associated ARDS and AKI managed with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) alone versus IMV and ECMO. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while secondary outcomes included renal replacement therapy (RRT), complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), and healthcare utilization. Results: Among 198,395 patients with COVID-19 ARDS complicated by AKI, 4,730 received IMV and ECMO. ECMO was not associated with reduced mortality after multivariable adjustment (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.96, 95% CI 0.81-1.12). However, ECMO was associated with greater odds of RRT, intracranial hemorrhage, disseminated intravascular coagulation, cardiogenic shock, vasopressor use, tracheostomy, acute liver failure, deep vein thrombosis, ischemic stroke and ICU-acquired weakness. ECMO was also associated with longer LOS and higher hospitalization costs. Conclusion: Among patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS and AKI, ECMO was not associated with a clear adjusted mortality benefit but was associated with markedly higher complication burden, longer hospitalization, and substantially greater healthcare resource utilization.
- Open Access
- 24 July 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Clinical Outcomes and Hospital Resource Utilization Among Patients with Septic Shock and COVID-19 Infection: Insights from United States National Inpatient Sample Analysis 2020–2022
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes a hyperinflammatory state, endothelial injury, microvascular thrombosis and myocardial dysfunction, which may lead to worsening circulatory failure in septic shock. Using a large National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2020 to 2022, we aimed to compare in-hospital mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury (AKI), need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), cardiac arrest, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), tracheostomy, acute liver failure, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), hospital length of stay (LOS), and total hospital charges in septic shock hospitalizations with and without COVID-19. A total of 2,175,619 adult septic shock hospitalizations were identified, of which 378,635 (17.4%) had COVID-19 infection. Hospitalizations with COVID-19 had significantly higher mortality (60.3% vs. 32.2%; aOR 3.43, 95% CI 3.35–3.50), increased need for non-invasive ventilation, invasive ventilation, and higher incidence of AKI, RRT, cardiac arrest, ARDS, ECMO use, and tracheostomy. Additionally, hospital LOS and total hospital charges were also significantly higher in hospitalizations with COVID-19. There was no significant difference in acute liver failure or DIC. In conclusion, COVID-19 infection was independently associated with worse outcomes and increased hospital resource utilization in adult septic shock hospitalizations.
- 24 July 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Open AccessClinical Outcomes and Hospital Resource Utilization Among Patients with Septic Shock and COVID-19 Infection: Insights from United States National Inpatient Sample Analysis 2020–2022
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes a hyperinflammatory state, endothelial injury, microvascular thrombosis and myocardial dysfunction, which may lead to worsening circulatory failure in septic shock. Using a large National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2020 to 2022, we aimed to compare in-hospital mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury (AKI), need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), cardiac arrest, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), tracheostomy, acute liver failure, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), hospital length of stay (LOS), and total hospital charges in septic shock hospitalizations with and without COVID-19. A total of 2,175,619 adult septic shock hospitalizations were identified, of which 378,635 (17.4%) had COVID-19 infection. Hospitalizations with COVID-19 had significantly higher mortality (60.3% vs. 32.2%; aOR 3.43, 95% CI 3.35–3.50), increased need for non-invasive ventilation, invasive ventilation, and higher incidence of AKI, RRT, cardiac arrest, ARDS, ECMO use, and tracheostomy. Additionally, hospital LOS and total hospital charges were also significantly higher in hospitalizations with COVID-19. There was no significant difference in acute liver failure or DIC. In conclusion, COVID-19 infection was independently associated with worse outcomes and increased hospital resource utilization in adult septic shock hospitalizations.
- Open Access
- 31 October 2024
- Published by Biomedical Informatics in Bioinformation
- Vol. 20 (10) , 1287-1290
The ctDNA revolution: Insights on cancer care: A narrative review
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a revolutionary tool in the detection and monitoring of cancer: a minimally invasive, highly sensitive approach to analysing tumor-specific DNA in the bloodstream. Therefore, it is of interest to explore the current and evolving landscape of cancer genomics as precision tools in quantifying tumor dynamics. Thus, the role of ctDNA in tracking minimum residual disease, relapse, recurrence and the tailoring of therapeutic strategies for effective management of tumours is reviewed.
- 31 October 2024
- Published by Biomedical Informatics in Bioinformation
- Vol. 20 (10) , 1287-1290
Open AccessThe ctDNA revolution: Insights on cancer care: A narrative review
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a revolutionary tool in the detection and monitoring of cancer: a minimally invasive, highly sensitive approach to analysing tumor-specific DNA in the bloodstream. Therefore, it is of interest to explore the current and evolving landscape of cancer genomics as precision tools in quantifying tumor dynamics. Thus, the role of ctDNA in tracking minimum residual disease, relapse, recurrence and the tailoring of therapeutic strategies for effective management of tumours is reviewed.