Amobichukwu Chukwudi Amanambu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Amobichukwu Chukwudi Amanambu has a total of 16 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ali Rashed Alruzuq
Department of Geography and Geographic Information Systems,Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University,Riyadh,Saudi Arabia, Saudi Arabia
2 shared publications - Audrey Culver Smith
Department of Geography, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
1 shared publication - Bewuket B. Tefera
Department of Geography, 3141 Turlington Hall, 330 Newell Dr., University of Florida, 32611-7315, USA
1 shared publication - Charles Nathan Jones
Biological Sciences University of Alabama Tuscaloosa AL USA
1 shared publication - Christina Lynn Staudhammer
Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA
1 shared publication - Hazhir Karimi
Department of Geography and the Environment, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 December 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Acta Geophysica
- Vol. 74 (1) , 11
Morphodynamics and riverbed elevation changes in the lower Apalachicola River: a study of large lowland river systems
- 1 December 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Acta Geophysica
- Vol. 74 (1) , 11
Morphodynamics and riverbed elevation changes in the lower Apalachicola River: a study of large lowland river systems
- Open Access
Mapping Tradeoffs and Synergies in Ecosystem Services as a Function of Forest Management
The spatial variation of forest ecosystem services at regional scales remains poorly understood, and few studies have explicitly analyzed how ecosystem services are distributed across different forest management types. This study assessed the spatial overlap between forest management types and ecosystem service hotspots in the Southeastern United States (SEUS) and the Pacific Northwest (PNW) forests. We used the InVEST suite of tools and GIS to quantify carbon storage and water yield. Carbon storage was estimated, stratified by forest group and age class, and literature-based biomass pool values were applied. Average annual water yield and its temporal changes (2001–2020) were modeled using the annual water yield model, incorporating precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, vegetation type, and soil characteristics. Ecosystem service outputs were classified to identify hotspot zones (top 20%) and to evaluate the synergies and tradeoffs between these services. Hotspots were then overlaid with forest management maps to examine their distribution across management types. We found that only 2% of the SEUS and 11% of the PNW region were simultaneous hotspots for both services. In the SEUS, ecological and preservation forest management types showed higher efficiency in hotspot allocation, while in PNW, production forestry contributed relatively more to hotspot areas. These findings offer valuable insights for decision-makers and forest managers seeking to preserve the multiple benefits that forests provide at regional scales.
Open AccessMapping Tradeoffs and Synergies in Ecosystem Services as a Function of Forest Management
The spatial variation of forest ecosystem services at regional scales remains poorly understood, and few studies have explicitly analyzed how ecosystem services are distributed across different forest management types. This study assessed the spatial overlap between forest management types and ecosystem service hotspots in the Southeastern United States (SEUS) and the Pacific Northwest (PNW) forests. We used the InVEST suite of tools and GIS to quantify carbon storage and water yield. Carbon storage was estimated, stratified by forest group and age class, and literature-based biomass pool values were applied. Average annual water yield and its temporal changes (2001–2020) were modeled using the annual water yield model, incorporating precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, vegetation type, and soil characteristics. Ecosystem service outputs were classified to identify hotspot zones (top 20%) and to evaluate the synergies and tradeoffs between these services. Hotspots were then overlaid with forest management maps to examine their distribution across management types. We found that only 2% of the SEUS and 11% of the PNW region were simultaneous hotspots for both services. In the SEUS, ecological and preservation forest management types showed higher efficiency in hotspot allocation, while in PNW, production forestry contributed relatively more to hotspot areas. These findings offer valuable insights for decision-makers and forest managers seeking to preserve the multiple benefits that forests provide at regional scales.
- 5 February 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Environmental Management
- Vol. 376, 124323
Combining deep learning and machine learning techniques to track air pollution in relation to vegetation cover utilizing remotely sensed data
- 5 February 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Environmental Management
- Vol. 376, 124323
Combining deep learning and machine learning techniques to track air pollution in relation to vegetation cover utilizing remotely sensed data