Jing Zhu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Jing Zhu has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Anh Vu Vo
School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
1 shared publication - Debra F. Laefer
Department of Civil and Urban Engineering, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA
1 shared publication - Evan O'Keeffe
Center for Urban Science + Progress, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA
1 shared publication - Kim Hertz
Department of Civil and Urban Engineering, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA
1 shared publication - Kshitij Chandna
Center for Urban Science + Progress, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA
1 shared publication - Michela Bertolotto
School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 9 February 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Remote Sensing
- Vol. 17 (4) , 592
Low-Cost, LiDAR-Based, Dynamic, Flood Risk Communication Viewer
This paper proposes a flood risk visualization method that is (1) readily transferable (2) hyperlocal, (3) computationally inexpensive, and (4) geometrically accurate. This proposal is for risk communication, to provide high-resolution, three-dimensional flood visualization at the sub-meter level. The method couples a laser scanning point cloud with algorithms that produce textured floodwaters, achieved through compounding multiple sine functions in a graphics shader. This hyper-local approach to visualization is enhanced by the ability to portray changes in (i) watercolor, (ii) texture, and (iii) motion (including dynamic heights) for various flood prediction scenarios. Through decoupling physics-based predictions from the visualization, a dynamic, flood risk viewer was produced with modest processing resources involving only a single, quad-core processor with a frequency around 4.30 GHz and with no graphics card. The system offers several major advantages. (1) The approach enables its use on a browser or with inexpensive, virtual reality hardware and, thus, promotes local dissemination for flood risk communication, planning, and mitigation. (2) The approach can be used for any scenario where water interfaces with the built environment, including inside of pipes. (3) When tested for a coastal inundation scenario from a hurricane, 92% of the neighborhood participants found it to be more effective in communicating flood risk than traditional 2D mapping flood warnings provided by governmental authorities.
- 9 February 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Remote Sensing
- Vol. 17 (4) , 592
Open AccessLow-Cost, LiDAR-Based, Dynamic, Flood Risk Communication Viewer
This paper proposes a flood risk visualization method that is (1) readily transferable (2) hyperlocal, (3) computationally inexpensive, and (4) geometrically accurate. This proposal is for risk communication, to provide high-resolution, three-dimensional flood visualization at the sub-meter level. The method couples a laser scanning point cloud with algorithms that produce textured floodwaters, achieved through compounding multiple sine functions in a graphics shader. This hyper-local approach to visualization is enhanced by the ability to portray changes in (i) watercolor, (ii) texture, and (iii) motion (including dynamic heights) for various flood prediction scenarios. Through decoupling physics-based predictions from the visualization, a dynamic, flood risk viewer was produced with modest processing resources involving only a single, quad-core processor with a frequency around 4.30 GHz and with no graphics card. The system offers several major advantages. (1) The approach enables its use on a browser or with inexpensive, virtual reality hardware and, thus, promotes local dissemination for flood risk communication, planning, and mitigation. (2) The approach can be used for any scenario where water interfaces with the built environment, including inside of pipes. (3) When tested for a coastal inundation scenario from a hurricane, 92% of the neighborhood participants found it to be more effective in communicating flood risk than traditional 2D mapping flood warnings provided by governmental authorities.