Bernard I'ONs
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Bernard I'ONs has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Bethany Growns
1 shared publication- David Charles Mangham
Department of Histopathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
1 shared publication - Gary Edmond
School of Law, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
1 shared publication - Gianni Ribeiro
School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
1 shared publication Jason Chin
1 shared publication- Kristy A. Martire
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 30 April 2025
- Published by Center for Open Science in MetaArXiv
Systematic review: The reliability of indicators that may differentiate between suicidal, homicidal, and accidental sharp force wounds [peer reviewed]]
This protocol aims to address two metaresearch questions: what do we know about the science underlying impactful legal decisions and how can we assess this evidence efficiently and accurately, such that it is usable for courts? To do so, this protocol describes our plan for a systematic review of the literature underlying whether there are reliable indicators of the manner of death in stab wound cases. Evidence of nature was recently found admissible at the High Court of Australia in Lang v The Queen. However, despite the High Court uncritically accepting this evidence, there has never been a systematic review that critically appraises the relevant literature. Beyond the review itself, we will fully document our process and all of the time-saving tools we rely on to provide knowledge about whether systematic reviews of this nature can be efficiently deployed in legal proceedings.
- 30 April 2025
- Published by Center for Open Science in MetaArXiv
Open AccessSystematic review: The reliability of indicators that may differentiate between suicidal, homicidal, and accidental sharp force wounds [peer reviewed]]
This protocol aims to address two metaresearch questions: what do we know about the science underlying impactful legal decisions and how can we assess this evidence efficiently and accurately, such that it is usable for courts? To do so, this protocol describes our plan for a systematic review of the literature underlying whether there are reliable indicators of the manner of death in stab wound cases. Evidence of nature was recently found admissible at the High Court of Australia in Lang v The Queen. However, despite the High Court uncritically accepting this evidence, there has never been a systematic review that critically appraises the relevant literature. Beyond the review itself, we will fully document our process and all of the time-saving tools we rely on to provide knowledge about whether systematic reviews of this nature can be efficiently deployed in legal proceedings.
- 17 February 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
- Vol. 111, 102835
Skull fractures or accessory sutures: A case report
- 17 February 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
- Vol. 111, 102835
Skull fractures or accessory sutures: A case report