Shuting Li
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Shuting Li has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Beate Sodian
Department of Psychology Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München Munich Germany
2 shared publications - Jörg Meinhardt
Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
2 shared publications - Barbara C. N. Müller
Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
1 shared publication - Daoyang Wang
Zhejiang Philosophy and Social Science Key Laboratory for Research in Early Development and Childcare Hangzhou Normal University Hangzhou China
1 shared publication - Sha Tao
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning Beijing Normal University Beijing China
1 shared publication Yang Gao
Zhejiang Philosophy and Social Science Key Laboratory for Research in Early Development and Childcare Hangzhou Normal University Hangzhou China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 19 October 2026
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Adolescence
Gender Differences in the Development of Growth and Fixed Mindsets Among Chinese Adolescents: A Cross‐Lagged Panel Network Analysis
Introduction: Students' mindsets about the malleability of their abilities shape their academic performance, social adaptation, and psychological well‐being, making it important to track how these beliefs change during adolescence. Although mindsets undergo substantial change in this period, most studies have used latent variable models that ignore the dynamic interactions among mindset items. Examining how specific items change over time can thus reveal how mindsets develop and whether this process differs between boys and girls. Methods: This study examined the temporal links among the 10 growth mindset items and the 10 fixed mindset items, identifying the central beliefs within each network, in 15,386 students (40% girls; = 16.73 years) from 31 secondary vocational schools in China, followed annually over 3 years. Mixed‐design ANOVA and cross‐lagged panel network (CLPN) analysis were used to compare mindset development between genders. Results: Boys consistently reported higher aggregate scores on both growth and fixed mindsets than girls, though these differences were small. The CLPN analysis showed gender‐specific trajectories: girls showed earlier and more pronounced changes in the growth mindset network, whereas boys showed slower integration of growth‐related beliefs. By contrast, the fixed mindset networks developed similarly across genders. Item‐level cross‐lagged associations were small, and network comparisons were descriptive. Conclusions: Conceptualizing mindsets as interconnected networks, this study identifies gender‐specific developmental patterns in mindset organization among Chinese vocational students, showing how mindset items co‐develop over time and suggesting candidate targets for gender‐sensitive interventions in the future.
- 19 October 2026
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Adolescence
Gender Differences in the Development of Growth and Fixed Mindsets Among Chinese Adolescents: A Cross‐Lagged Panel Network Analysis
Introduction: Students' mindsets about the malleability of their abilities shape their academic performance, social adaptation, and psychological well‐being, making it important to track how these beliefs change during adolescence. Although mindsets undergo substantial change in this period, most studies have used latent variable models that ignore the dynamic interactions among mindset items. Examining how specific items change over time can thus reveal how mindsets develop and whether this process differs between boys and girls. Methods: This study examined the temporal links among the 10 growth mindset items and the 10 fixed mindset items, identifying the central beliefs within each network, in 15,386 students (40% girls; = 16.73 years) from 31 secondary vocational schools in China, followed annually over 3 years. Mixed‐design ANOVA and cross‐lagged panel network (CLPN) analysis were used to compare mindset development between genders. Results: Boys consistently reported higher aggregate scores on both growth and fixed mindsets than girls, though these differences were small. The CLPN analysis showed gender‐specific trajectories: girls showed earlier and more pronounced changes in the growth mindset network, whereas boys showed slower integration of growth‐related beliefs. By contrast, the fixed mindset networks developed similarly across genders. Item‐level cross‐lagged associations were small, and network comparisons were descriptive. Conclusions: Conceptualizing mindsets as interconnected networks, this study identifies gender‐specific developmental patterns in mindset organization among Chinese vocational students, showing how mindset items co‐develop over time and suggesting candidate targets for gender‐sensitive interventions in the future.
- Open Access
- 15 July 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Infant Behavior and Development
- Vol. 80, 102106
Neural correlates of false belief understanding in 33- to 36-month-old infants
- 15 July 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Infant Behavior and Development
- Vol. 80, 102106
Open AccessNeural correlates of false belief understanding in 33- to 36-month-old infants
- Open Access
- 20 February 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Brain Research
- Vol. 1853, 149523
Resting-state EEG alpha asymmetry predicts false belief understanding during early childhood: An exploratory longitudinal study
- 20 February 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Brain Research
- Vol. 1853, 149523
Open AccessResting-state EEG alpha asymmetry predicts false belief understanding during early childhood: An exploratory longitudinal study