Chunyu Kao
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Chunyu Kao has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Gaofeng Zong
School of Statistics and Mathematics, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China
1 shared publication - Jiayi Peng
School of Finance and Business, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
1 shared publication - Liang Hao
School of Finance and Business, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
1 shared publication - Po Ning
School of Finance and Business, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
1 shared publication - Yuetong Zhang
School of Mathematics, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
1 shared publication - Yuping Song
School of Finance and Business, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 11 April 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Mathematics
- Vol. 13 (8) , 1260
Transformer-Based Downside Risk Forecasting: A Data-Driven Approach with Realized Downward Semi-Variance
Realized downward semi-variance (RDS) has been realized as a key indicator to measure the downside risk of asset prices, and the accurate prediction of RDS can effectively guide traders’ investment behavior and avoid the impact of market fluctuations caused by price declines. In this paper, the RDS rolling prediction performance of the traditional econometric model, machine learning model, and deep learning model is discussed in combination with various relevant influencing factors, and the sensitivity analysis is further carried out with the rolling window length, prediction length, and a variety of evaluation methods. In addition, due to the characteristics of RDS, such as aggregation and jumping, this paper further discusses the robustness of the model under the impact of external events, the influence of emotional factors on the prediction accuracy of the model, and the results and analysis of the hybrid model. The empirical results show that (1) when the rolling window is set to 20, the overall prediction effect of the model in this paper is the best. Taking the Transformer model under SSE as an example, compared with the prediction results under the rolling window length of 5, 10, and 30, the RMSE improvement ratio reaches 24.69%, 15.90%, and 43.60%, respectively. (2) The multivariable Transformer model shows a better forecasting effect. Compared with traditional econometric, machine learning, and deep learning models, the average increase percentage of RMSE, MAE, MAPE, SMAPE, MBE, and SD indicators is 52.23%, 20.03%, 62.33%, 60.33%, 37.57%, and 18.70%, respectively. (3) In multi-step prediction scenarios, the DM test statistic of the Transformer model is significantly positive, and the prediction accuracy of the Transformer model remains stable as the number of prediction steps increases. (4) Under the impact of external events of COVID-19, the Transformer model has stability, and the addition of emotional factors can effectively improve the prediction accuracy. In addition, the model’s prediction performance and generalization ability can be further improved by stacked prediction models. An in-depth study of RDS forecasting is of great value to capture the characteristics of downside risks, enrich the financial risk measurement system, and better evaluate potential losses.
- 11 April 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Mathematics
- Vol. 13 (8) , 1260
Open AccessTransformer-Based Downside Risk Forecasting: A Data-Driven Approach with Realized Downward Semi-Variance
Realized downward semi-variance (RDS) has been realized as a key indicator to measure the downside risk of asset prices, and the accurate prediction of RDS can effectively guide traders’ investment behavior and avoid the impact of market fluctuations caused by price declines. In this paper, the RDS rolling prediction performance of the traditional econometric model, machine learning model, and deep learning model is discussed in combination with various relevant influencing factors, and the sensitivity analysis is further carried out with the rolling window length, prediction length, and a variety of evaluation methods. In addition, due to the characteristics of RDS, such as aggregation and jumping, this paper further discusses the robustness of the model under the impact of external events, the influence of emotional factors on the prediction accuracy of the model, and the results and analysis of the hybrid model. The empirical results show that (1) when the rolling window is set to 20, the overall prediction effect of the model in this paper is the best. Taking the Transformer model under SSE as an example, compared with the prediction results under the rolling window length of 5, 10, and 30, the RMSE improvement ratio reaches 24.69%, 15.90%, and 43.60%, respectively. (2) The multivariable Transformer model shows a better forecasting effect. Compared with traditional econometric, machine learning, and deep learning models, the average increase percentage of RMSE, MAE, MAPE, SMAPE, MBE, and SD indicators is 52.23%, 20.03%, 62.33%, 60.33%, 37.57%, and 18.70%, respectively. (3) In multi-step prediction scenarios, the DM test statistic of the Transformer model is significantly positive, and the prediction accuracy of the Transformer model remains stable as the number of prediction steps increases. (4) Under the impact of external events of COVID-19, the Transformer model has stability, and the addition of emotional factors can effectively improve the prediction accuracy. In addition, the model’s prediction performance and generalization ability can be further improved by stacked prediction models. An in-depth study of RDS forecasting is of great value to capture the characteristics of downside risks, enrich the financial risk measurement system, and better evaluate potential losses.
- Open Access
- 24 February 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Mathematics
- Vol. 13 (5) , 728
Borel–Cantelli Lemma for Capacities
In this paper, we investigate the second Borel–Cantelli lemma for capacity without the assumption of independence for events. We obtain a sufficient condition under which the second Borel–Cantelli lemma for capacity holds. Our results are natural extensions of the classical Borel–Cantelli lemma. However, the proof is different from the existing literature.
- 24 February 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Mathematics
- Vol. 13 (5) , 728
Open AccessBorel–Cantelli Lemma for Capacities
In this paper, we investigate the second Borel–Cantelli lemma for capacity without the assumption of independence for events. We obtain a sufficient condition under which the second Borel–Cantelli lemma for capacity holds. Our results are natural extensions of the classical Borel–Cantelli lemma. However, the proof is different from the existing literature.