Jingyuan Chen
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Jingyuan Chen has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Junpei Huang
Department of Physical Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
1 shared publication - Junpei Huang
School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
1 shared publication - Ni Chen
Department of Physical Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
1 shared publication - Tianfeng Lu
Sports and Health Research Center, Department of Physical Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
1 shared publication - Yue Han
Department of Physical Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 24 February 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 15 (5) , 2434
The Effects of Velocity- Versus Percentage-Based Resistance Training on Lower Limb Explosive Power and Footwork Movement Speed in Elite University Badminton Players
Purpose: Footwork speed is closely linked to explosive strength, and both percentage- (PBRT) and velocity-based resistance training (VBRT) are popular methods for developing muscle strength. This study aimed to compare the effects of PBRT and VBRT on lower limb explosive power and footwork movement speed in elite university badminton players over a 6-week training period. Methods: A total of 20 elite badminton players (12 males, 8 females) from Tongji University were randomly divided into VBRT (n = 10) and PBRT groups (n = 10). The VBRT group trained with loads determined by target speed and velocity loss, while the PBRT participants used fixed loads based on a percentage of their one-repetition maximum (1RM). Both the groups performed free-weight back squats with relative loads ranging from 65% to 95% of 1RM over 6 weeks. The pre- and post-training measurements included back squat 1RM; countermovement (CMJ), squat (SJ), and standing long jumps (SLJs); self-weighted squat jump speed (SJS); left and right touch line (LRF), full-field four-point (FF), and front and back touch net footwork (FBF). Results: (1) The baseline measurements showed no significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05). (2) Post-training, both VBRT and PBRT improved the participants’ lower limb explosive power and footwork movement (p < 0.05). (3) The VBRT group demonstrated significantly greater improvements than the PBRT group in all the measures (p < 0.05). Conclusions: VBRT was superior to PBRT in boosting lower limb explosive power and footwork speed in badminton players over 6 weeks, leading to more significant strength–related and neural adaptations.
- 24 February 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 15 (5) , 2434
Open AccessThe Effects of Velocity- Versus Percentage-Based Resistance Training on Lower Limb Explosive Power and Footwork Movement Speed in Elite University Badminton Players
Purpose: Footwork speed is closely linked to explosive strength, and both percentage- (PBRT) and velocity-based resistance training (VBRT) are popular methods for developing muscle strength. This study aimed to compare the effects of PBRT and VBRT on lower limb explosive power and footwork movement speed in elite university badminton players over a 6-week training period. Methods: A total of 20 elite badminton players (12 males, 8 females) from Tongji University were randomly divided into VBRT (n = 10) and PBRT groups (n = 10). The VBRT group trained with loads determined by target speed and velocity loss, while the PBRT participants used fixed loads based on a percentage of their one-repetition maximum (1RM). Both the groups performed free-weight back squats with relative loads ranging from 65% to 95% of 1RM over 6 weeks. The pre- and post-training measurements included back squat 1RM; countermovement (CMJ), squat (SJ), and standing long jumps (SLJs); self-weighted squat jump speed (SJS); left and right touch line (LRF), full-field four-point (FF), and front and back touch net footwork (FBF). Results: (1) The baseline measurements showed no significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05). (2) Post-training, both VBRT and PBRT improved the participants’ lower limb explosive power and footwork movement (p < 0.05). (3) The VBRT group demonstrated significantly greater improvements than the PBRT group in all the measures (p < 0.05). Conclusions: VBRT was superior to PBRT in boosting lower limb explosive power and footwork speed in badminton players over 6 weeks, leading to more significant strength–related and neural adaptations.