Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Matilde Isabel Castillo-Hermoso has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Effectiveness of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Burns in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    by Celia Villalba-Aguilar, Juan Manuel Carmona-Torres, Lucía Villalba-Aguilar, Matilde Isabel Castillo-Hermoso, Rosa María Molina-Madueño, José Alberto Laredo-Aguilera

    Background: Burns represent a public health problem because they generate both physical and psychological damage, especially in the child and adolescent population, and high costs, especially due to the management of scars. Advances in burn care have improved survival and quality of life for this population. New clinical trials have been conducted on the benefits of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), showing that it improves the healing of burns and the appearance of scars. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the efficacy of NPWT both alone and as an adjunct to conventional dressings in pediatric and adolescent patients compared with conventional treatments. Methodology: A systematic search was carried out between December 2023 and the last quarter of 2025 in databases such as PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. This meta-analysis was performed following the PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and was registered in PROSPERO with registration number CRD42024597293. The risk of bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the studies. Quantitative meta-analyses using random-model effects were performed only for variables with sufficient comparable data among studies. For other outcomes, where meta-analysis was not feasible due to lack of comparable data or control groups, results were synthesized qualitatively. Results: A total of seven articles (three clinical trials and four retrospective studies), in which a total of 323 subjects participated, were included. The main results demonstrate the efficacy of NPWT, as it decreases the re-epithelialization time, improves the appearance of scars (MD = −1.25 (95% CI between −1.80 and −0.70)), reduces the probability of skin grafts (OR = 0.17 (95% CI between 0.06 and 0.46)), and therefore, as there is less need for surgery and fewer dressing changes, reduces costs. Conclusions: NPWT offers significant clinical benefits in the treatment of burns in children and adolescents. Although a meta-analysis could not be performed due to the lack of a control group in some studies, studies with larger samples and multicenter designs will be necessary to better assess the relevant clinical outcomes. However, the results of this study show that NPWT is effective in treating burns in children and adolescents and that its use in clinical practice may represent a promising adjunctive therapy.

  • Open Access

    Comparative Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Conventional Treatments in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    by Celia Villalba-Aguilar, José Alberto Laredo-Aguilera, Lucía Villalba-Aguilar, Matilde Isabel Castillo-Hermoso, Ángel López-Fernández-Roldán, Juan Manuel Carmona-Torres

    Background: Diabetic foot syndrome is a common complication of diabetes mellitus, and its incidence is increasing due to increasing rates of overweight and an aging population. Negative pressure wound therapy has been shown to improve wound healing. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of this therapy compared with conventional treatments in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library, and the methodological quality was assessed using the Rob2 scale. This meta-analysis was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: A total of 11 clinical trials involving 1117 subjects. The primary outcome was efficacy, which was measured by the complete healing rate, wound size, time to granulation tissue formation, adverse effects, amputations, hospital stay, and cost. This study demonstrated that this therapy improves healing (OR= −10.39, 95% CI [−14.22, −6.57]) and reduces wound size (OR = −4.11, 95% CI [−7.83, −0.39]) while potentially lowering overall costs. Conclusions: Limitations include heterogeneity and different variables measured in studies. Additionally, there were differences among the trials due to the lack of blinding. Although no significant differences were found in amputations or infections, this therapy reduces pain and decreases the use of antibiotics and analgesics. Its use requires individual and expert assessment to maximize its benefits.


  • Open Access

    Multifaceted Pathophysiology and Secondary Complications of Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: Focus on Pressure Injury

    by Mario Martínez-Torija, Pedro F. Esteban, Angela Santos-De-La-Mata, Matilde Castillo-Hermoso, Eduardo Molina-Holgado, Rafael Moreno-Luna

    Background/Objectives: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a complex medical condition with widespread effects that extend beyond motor and sensory impairments. In addition to nervous system damage, SCI patients experience various secondary complications, including vascular dysfunction, altered body composition, and metabolic disturbances. Among the most common secondary pathologies is the development of pressure injuries (PIs), chronic wounds that significantly affect quality of life and can be challenging to treat. Understanding the physiological and cellular mechanisms behind these complications is crucial for improving care and therapeutic outcomes. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar using keywords related to spinal cord injury, pressure ulcer/pressure injuries, metabolic and vascular dysfunction, biomechanics, and regenerative therapies. Studies were selected based on their relevance to the pathophysiology, risk factors, and novel therapeutic approaches for PIs in SCI patients. Results: Vascular dysfunction, characterized by impaired blood flow and microcirculatory issues, predisposes SCI patients to ischemia and tissue necrosis, particularly in areas subjected to prolonged pressure. Additionally, changes in body composition, such as increased adiposity and muscle atrophy, further compromise tissue integrity and healing capacity. The inflammatory response, mediated by cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α, exacerbates these effects by sustaining a pro-inflammatory environment that delays the transition of macrophages to the M2 phenotype, critical for wound healing. External factors, such as poor nutrition, infections, and immobility, also play a significant role in worsening the wound healing process. Conclusions: Chronic SCI induces a cascade of physiological changes that predispose patients to the development of PIs and complicate their recovery. The intricate interplay of vascular, metabolic, and inflammatory responses creates a hostile environment for wound healing. A deeper understanding of these systemic effects is essential not only for developing targeted therapeutic strategies to improve chronic wound healing but also for refining preventive approaches that minimize their occurrence. Advancing this knowledge will ultimately help enhance the quality of life for individuals with SCI.