Magdiel Acaz de Oliveira Teixeira
Research Subjects
Magdiel Acaz de Oliveira Teixeira has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Antônio Carlos Rodrigues Guimarães
Department of Fortification and Construction Engineering, Military Institute of Engineering-IME, Praça General Tibúrcio, 80, Urca, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, Brazil
1 shared publication - Fábio Grisolia de Ávila
Department of Fortification and Construction, Military Institute of Engineering-IME, Praça General Tibúrcio, 80, Urca, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, Brazil
1 shared publication - Lidiane Hellen dos Santos Santana
Department of Fortification and Construction, Military Institute of Engineering-IME, Praça General Tibúrcio, 80, Urca, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, Brazil
1 shared publication - Lisley Madeira Coelho
Department of Fortification and Construction Engineering, Military Institute of Engineering-IME, Praça General Tibúrcio, 80, Urca, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, Brazil
1 shared publication - Sergio Neves Monteiro
Department of Materials Science, Military Institute of Engineering—IME, Praça General Tibúrcio, 80, Praia Vermelha, Urca, Rio de Janeiro CEP 22290-270, RJ, Brazil
1 shared publication - William Wilson dos Santos
Department of Fortification and Construction, Military Institute of Engineering-IME, Praça General Tibúrcio, 80, Urca, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, Brazil
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 6 March 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Construction Materials
- Vol. 5 (1) , 13
Influence of Ballast and Sub-Ballast Thickness on Structural Behavior of Heavy-Haul Railway Platform Determined by Using Finite Element Modeling
This study investigates the influence of ballast and sub-ballast thicknesses on the structural behavior of a heavy-haul railway platform by using finite element modeling with SysTrain software (v. 1.84) A parametric analysis was conducted to assess how variations in layer thickness affect key performance parameters, including total deflection, bending moments in the rails, and vertical stresses within the railway track. The results indicate that reducing ballast thickness increases deflection and vertical stresses, while excessive thickness elevates system stiffness, reducing its ability to dissipate stresses. This condition can intensify the transmission of dynamic loads to track components, accelerating rail and sleeper wear and requiring more frequent corrective interventions, thereby increasing maintenance costs. Deflections remained within the 6.35 mm limit established by AREMA, except for one case (6.85 mm), where an excessive ballast thickness (160 cm) combined with low material stiffness resulted in non-compliance. Vertical stresses in the substructure ranged from 106.9 kPa to 155.9 kPa, staying within admissible limits. Additionally, the study highlights the significant role of material properties, particularly the resilient modulus, in the overall track performance. The findings enhance the understanding of how ballast and sub-ballast geometry affect railway structural behavior, demonstrating how numerical modeling with SysTrain can support decision-making in track design and maintenance strategies.
- 6 March 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Construction Materials
- Vol. 5 (1) , 13
Open AccessInfluence of Ballast and Sub-Ballast Thickness on Structural Behavior of Heavy-Haul Railway Platform Determined by Using Finite Element Modeling
This study investigates the influence of ballast and sub-ballast thicknesses on the structural behavior of a heavy-haul railway platform by using finite element modeling with SysTrain software (v. 1.84) A parametric analysis was conducted to assess how variations in layer thickness affect key performance parameters, including total deflection, bending moments in the rails, and vertical stresses within the railway track. The results indicate that reducing ballast thickness increases deflection and vertical stresses, while excessive thickness elevates system stiffness, reducing its ability to dissipate stresses. This condition can intensify the transmission of dynamic loads to track components, accelerating rail and sleeper wear and requiring more frequent corrective interventions, thereby increasing maintenance costs. Deflections remained within the 6.35 mm limit established by AREMA, except for one case (6.85 mm), where an excessive ballast thickness (160 cm) combined with low material stiffness resulted in non-compliance. Vertical stresses in the substructure ranged from 106.9 kPa to 155.9 kPa, staying within admissible limits. Additionally, the study highlights the significant role of material properties, particularly the resilient modulus, in the overall track performance. The findings enhance the understanding of how ballast and sub-ballast geometry affect railway structural behavior, demonstrating how numerical modeling with SysTrain can support decision-making in track design and maintenance strategies.