Konstantina Soultana Kitsou

Coronavirus anxiety is defined as a psychological contrast characterized by excessive fear, obsessive thoughts, and reassurance-seeking behaviors associated with COVID-19. As current scales have been tested primarily in North American populations, we aimed to translate and culturally adapt three measures of dysfunctional coronavirus anxiety—the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS), the Obsession with COVID-19 Scale (OCS), and the Coronavirus Reassurance-Seeking Behaviors Scale (CRBS)—for the first time in Greek-speaking populations. To translate existing scales, we followed best practices for cross-cultural comparisons using forward translation (English to Greek) and backward translation (Greek to English) with expert translation review, prior to conducting pilot testing and confirmatory factor analysis in a bespoke survey population. A total of 405 adults from Cyprus participated in this study. The results indicated that the Greek versions of these measures demonstrated adequate reliability (Cronbach’s alphas > 0.70) and strong factor structure, as supported through confirmatory factor analysis. However, only the CAS exhibited evidence of both convergent and divergent validity. Our study makes several innovative contributions which have broad implications for crisis preparedness, including providing a framework for mental health interventions in future pandemics or Black Swan events.

Introduction: The implementation and accessibility of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs), which ensure equal opportunities for health professionals to participate, are fundamental to the functioning of any national health system. Aim: This study aims to describe the main characteristics of MDTMs and assess the opinions and experiences of healthcare professionals who participated in these meetings. Materials and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of health professionals who participated in MDTMs at tertiary referral health centers within the Greek national health system. We employed a simple random sampling methodology, and the questionnaires were completed automatically. The survey was conducted from February to April 2022. Results: Ninety-eight questionnaires were distributed, and 72 complete responses were returned (response rate: 73.5%). The mean age of respondents was 47.2 ± 7.4 years. Sixty-five participants (90.3%) were specialized doctors, and thirty-nine (54.17%) stated that the time allocated for MDTM sessions was insufficient. Meanwhile, the majority agreed that MDTMs improved patient treatment allocation (n=59, 82%), were beneficial for healthcare professionals’ education (n=60, 83.4%), and enhanced the practical and educational skills of medical interns (n=57, 79.2%). Regarding case discussions in MDTMs, participants agreed that comorbidities (n=67, 93.1%), social-psychological factors (n=59, 82%), and patients’ preferences (n=62, 86.1%) should always be considered during meetings. The primary challenges in achieving a complete therapeutic plan were identified as inadequate teamwork (n=11, 15.3%), complexity of referred cases (n=9, 12.5%), and time constraints (n=9, 12.5%). Conclusions: Weaknesses in the healthcare system have emerged, necessitating action to address areas requiring improvement. Differences in the conceptual framework of MDTM functionality, particularly regarding specialists' specific roles and responsibilities, have been observed. Since the Greek national health system lacks specific protocols for the universal implementation of MDTMs, this study underscores the need for structured MDTM protocols in Greece to enhance healthcare professionals’ participation and optimize patient care.