JDJannis Duhn

Jannis Duhn

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Jannis Duhn has a total of 61 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Tobias Keck

    Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany

    7 shared publications
  • Andrea Sackmann

    Hessian Cancer Registry, Frankfurt on the Main, Germany

    4 shared publications
  • Bianca Franke

    Association of German Tumor Centers (ADT), Network for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology, Berlin, Germany

    4 shared publications
  • Fabian Reinwald

    Cancer Registry of Rhineland-Palatinate in the Institute for Digital Health Data, Mainz, Germany

    4 shared publications
  • Lennart von Fritsch

    Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany

    4 shared publications
  • Louisa Bolm

    Department of Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany

    4 shared publications

Latest Publications

  • Outcomes following adjuvant chemotherapy for distal bile duct carcinoma—A real-world data analysis from German Cancer Registries

    by Jannis Duhn, Lennart von Fritsch, Kim C. Honselmann, Rüdiger Braun, Lars Peters, Julia Strässer, Kees Kleihues-Van Tol, Constanze Schneider, Fabian Reinwald, Andrea Sackmann, et al.

  • Open Access

    Octogenarians and Pancreatic Cancer: Is Surgery Always the Right Choice?

    by Lennart von Fritsch, Dina Abual Naaj, Jannis Duhn, Kim C. Honselmann, Louisa Bolm, Rüdiger Braun, Hryhoriy Lapshyn, Stanislav Litkevych, Constanze Schneider, Fabian Reinwald, et al.

    Background: Demographic change is leading to an increasing portion of octogenarians with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Surgery remains a central component of curative-intent treatment. Nevertheless, it carries a risk of potentially life-threatening complications and high morbidity. Whether octogenarians benefit from surgery remains unclear. Methods: Using data from the clinical cancer registries of the 10th National Oncology Quality Conference of the ADT, we divided all patients with PDAC diagnosed between 2015 and 2023 into three age groups (≤65 years, n = 944; 66–79 years, n = 1535; ≥80 years, n = 537) and compared demographics, histopathology, treatment patterns, and survival data. Results: We observed an increasing proportion of octogenarians over the years from 15% in 2015 to 32% in 2023. While they were diagnosed with more favorable tumor stages, they more often received palliative chemotherapy (28% vs. 18%/19% in the younger cohorts). Only 24% of octogenarians who underwent surgery received adjuvant chemotherapy. Octogenarians had a worse overall and disease-free survival and 90-day mortality than the younger age groups. Furthermore, octogenarians with surgery or chemotherapy with curative intent alone had survival rates comparable to patients with palliative care. Conclusions: Octogenarians largely do not benefit from surgery alone. As only a quarter of octogenarians received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery, neoadjuvant concepts might be useful for selecting patients who are fit enough to undergo and benefit from multimodal treatment.


  • Open Access

    Oncologic outcomes and prognostic factors of colloid carcinoma of the pancreas – a retrospective real-world data analysis from the German cancer registry group of the society of German tumor centers

    by Jannis Duhn, Lennart von Fritsch, Kim C. Honselmann, Louisa Bolm, Christoph Gerling, Kees Kleihues-Van Tol, Maria Elena Lacruz, Constanze Schneider, Fabian Reinwald, Andrea Sackmann, et al.

    Background: Colloid carcinoma (CC) is a rare subtype of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) characterized by mucin pools in over 80% of the tumor. This study compares the histopathology and outcomes of CC and not-otherwise specified PDAC (PDAC-NOS, referring to “classical” PDAC) using pooled data retrieved from regional cancer registries participating in the Clinical Cancer Registry Group of the Association of German Tumor Centers (GCRG/ADT). Materials and methods: Data from patients within the pooled dataset of the GCRG/ADT with pancreatic cancer (diagnosed between 2000 and 2023) were analyzed. Histological subtypes were identified by ICD-O3 histology code. Epidemiology, histopathology and survival rates were compared between surgically resected CC and PDAC-NOS. Prognostic impacts were assessed using uni- and multivariable regression analyses in R. Results: The study included 474 CC and 21,360 PDAC-NOS patients. CC patients presented more often without lymph node metastases (pN0: 44.0 vs. 31.5%, p < 0.001), lower grading and less lymphatic and blood vessel invasion (each p < 0.001). The R0 resection rate was similar in both groups. CC patients had superior OS compared to PDAC-NOS (median OS: 24.8 vs. 17.3 months, p < 0.001). Importantly, CC histology was an independent positive prognostic factor for OS. Grading, lymph- and blood-vessel invasion were independent prognostic factors for CC patients. Adjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival in UICC IIB CC patients. Conclusion: CC patients showed better oncological outcomes after surgical resection compared to PDAC-NOS. Thereby, CC-subtype is an independent positive prognostic factor for OS, associated with lower tumor stages, fewer lymph node metastases, and less vascular invasion.

  • Open Access

    Adjuvant Chemotherapy Is Associated with Improved Survival in Advanced Ampullary Adenocarcinoma—A Population-Based Analysis by the German Cancer Registry Group

    by Jannis Duhn, Julia Strässer, Lennart von Fritsch, Rüdiger Braun, Kim C. Honselmann, Markus Kist, Thaer S. A. Abdalla, Kees Kleihues-Van Tol, Bianca Franke, Fabian Reinwald, et al.

    Introduction: Ampullary adenocarcinomas (AMPACs) represent rare malignant neoplasms arising in the Ampulla of Vater. Due to a lack of prospective studies and heterogeneous results from retrospective analyses, the outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in AMPAC are unclear. Methods: Pooled, pseudonymized data were retrieved from clinical cancer registries participating in the German Cancer Registry Group of the Association of German Tumor Centers (GCRG/ADT). Patients who underwent surgical resection of AMPACs (ICD-10: C24.1) with subsequent follow-up or AC were included. Patients with 90-day postoperative mortality were excluded. The epidemiologic and histopathologic features as well as the overall survival and recurrences were compared in both groups using R statistics. Results: In total, 830 patients with AMPACs were identified, of which 184 (22.2%) received AC. The surgery + AC patients showed more advanced tumor stages and more pronounced locoregional invasion as compared to the group undergoing surgery alone. AC was independently associated with an improved overall survival (OS) in a multivariable analysis (HR 0.57, p < 0.001), where pT3-4 status, lymph node metastases, vascular invasion, and advanced grading remained independent prognostic factors for OS. In the subgroup analyses, AC was associated with improved OS in the patients with pT3-4 tumors, lymph node metastases, lymphovascular invasion, and advanced grading, or UICC stage III, whereas no association with the OS was observed in the other subgroups. AC was also associated with superior disease-free survival (DFS) in a multivariable analysis. Conclusions: We provide a large-scale population-based analysis of AMPAC patients, showing an association of AC with improved OS in patients with advanced-staged disease or signs of locoregional invasion as compared to surgery alone.


  • Open Access

    Perioperative and oncologic outcomes after total pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma—A propensity score–matched analysis from the German Cancer Registry Group

    by Jannis Duhn, Lennart von Fritsch, Louisa Bolm, Rüdiger Braun, Kim Honselmann, Stanislav Litkevych, Markus Kist, Steffen Deichmann, Kees Kleihues-Van Tol, Bianca Franke, et al.


  • Open Access

    An R0 resection margin does improve overall survival after PDAC resection– real-world evidence from 6.000 cases from the German Cancer Registry Group

    by Lennart von Fritsch, Jannis Duhn, Thaer S.A. Abdalla, Kim C. Honselmann, Louisa Bolm, Rüdiger Braun, Markus Kist, Hryhoriy Lapshyn, Sylke Ruth Zeissig, Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke, et al.


  • Open Access

    Oncological Outcomes and Patterns of Recurrence after the Surgical Resection of an Invasive Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm versus Primary Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: An Analysis from the German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers

    by Thaer S. A. Abdalla, Jannis Duhn, Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke, Sylke Ruth Zeissig, Kees Kleihues-Van Tol, Kim C. Honselmann, Rüdiger Braun, Markus Kist, Louisa Bolm, Lennart von Fritsch, et al.

    Background: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are premalignant cystic neoplasms of the pancreas (CNPs), which can progress to invasive IPMN and pancreatic cancer. The available literature has shown controversial results regarding prognosis and clinical outcomes after the resection of invasive IPMN. Aims: This study aims to characterize the oncologic outcomes and metastatic progression pattern after the resection of non-metastatic invasive IPMN. Methods: Data were obtained from 24 clinical cancer registries participating in the German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers (ADT). Patients with invasive IPMN (n = 217) as well as PDAC (n = 5794) between 2000 and 2021 were included and compared regarding oncological outcomes. Results: Invasive IPMN was significantly smaller in size (p < 0.001) and of a lower tumor grade (p < 0.001), with fewer lymph node metastases (p < 0.001), lymphangiosis (p < 0.001), and consequently a higher R0 resection rate (88 vs. 74%) compared to PDAC. Moreover, invasive IPMN was associated with fewer local (11 vs. 15%) and distant recurrences (29 vs. 46%) and metastasized more frequently in the lungs only (26% vs. 14%). Invasive IPMN was associated with a longer median OS (29 vs. 19 months) and DFS (31 vs. 15 months) compared to PDAC and stayed independently prognostic in multivariable analyses. These survival differences were most pronounced in early tumor stages. Interestingly, postoperative chemotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival in surgically resected invasive IPMN. Conclusions: Invasive IPMN is a rare pancreatic entity with increasing incidence in Germany. It is associated with favorable histopathological features at the time of resection and longer OS and DFS compared to PDAC, particularly before the locoregional spread has occurred. Invasive IPMNs are associated with lung-only metastasis. The benefit of postoperative chemotherapy after the resection of invasive IPMN remains uncertain.