DFDuo Fang

Duo Fang

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Duo Fang has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Hao Wu

    Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang, China

    1 shared publication
  • Lun Yao

    Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control Agents for Animal Bacteriosis, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China

    1 shared publication
  • Ping Zhou

    Hubei Institute of Veterinary Drug Control, Wuhan, China

    1 shared publication
  • Xinhua Zhang

    Kingsino Agricultural Industry Research Institute, Shenzhen Kingsino Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China

    1 shared publication
  • Yulin Zhan

    School of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China

    1 shared publication
  • Yumei Fu

    Kingsino Agricultural Industry Research Institute, Shenzhen Kingsino Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Establishment of an RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a-based diagnostic method for the detection of fowl adenovirus serotype 4 virus in chickens and wild birds

    by Xinhua Zhang, Yulin Zhan, Hao Wu, Ping Zhou, Yumei Fu, Lun Yao, Duo Fang

    Fowl adenovirus (FAdV) serotype 4, recognized as the causative agent of hydropericardium syndrome (HPS) in chickens, causes substantial economic losses in poultry farming. To develop a simple, rapid, and reliable diagnostic method for the timely detection of FAdV-4 nucleic acid, we integrated the CRISPR/Cas12a system with recombinase-aided amplification (RAA). This approach enables visual detection of FAdV-4 with a sensitivity of one genome copy. The results can be obtained within 40 to 50 min without the need for complex instrumentation, making it ideal for remote field applications. Using this method, we investigated the prevalence of FAdV-4 in both common farm poultry and wild birds. Our results indicated that the FAdV-4-positive rate in wild birds was 51.19%, suggesting that wild birds may serve as specific reservoirs for this virus. In summary, we present a sensitive, swift, accurate, and inexpensive detection method for FAdV-4, along with an investigation of its epidemic situation in birds. Our study advances the detection and epidemiological understanding of FAdV-4 transmission among farm poultry and wild birds.