Isabel Monte-Tablada
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Isabel Monte-Tablada has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Bart Vogelaar
Developmental and Educational Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
2 shared publications - Francisca Serrano
The Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC) University of Granada (UGR) Granada Spain
2 shared publications - Sara Mata
The Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC) University of Granada (UGR) Granada Spain
2 shared publications - Macarena De Los Santos-Roig
The Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC) University of Granada (UGR) Granada Spain
1 shared publication - Sergio Moreno-Ríos
The Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center at University of Granada (CIMCYC-UGR), Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 10 March 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Acta Psychologica
- Vol. 264, 106559
The Spanish version of the computerized dynamic test of analogical reasoning
- 10 March 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Acta Psychologica
- Vol. 264, 106559
Open AccessThe Spanish version of the computerized dynamic test of analogical reasoning
Dynamic Assessment for Literacy: Utility in Children With Difficulties of Different Socioeconomic Status
Although children who grow up in a low socioeconomic situation present deficits in literacy skills, the present research aimed to shed light on the skills they possess and how detecting them can help improve their development. A total of 439 children were analysed for their literacy skills, learning potential in reading‐ and writing‐related skills as determined by dynamic assessment methodology, and behaviour during the test situation. Participants belonged to three groups: children with socioeconomic disadvantage, children with literacy difficulties and children with typical development. Results showed that children with socioeconomic disadvantage and those with literacy difficulties showed similar results in traditional reading and writing tests. Nonetheless, children with socioeconomic disadvantage showed higher learning potential in these skills than children with literacy difficulties. This result supports the accuracy of dynamic assessment for classification. In addition, the behavioural profile in a test situation differed between the groups. The study conclusions relate to the importance of developing intervention programmes in reading and writing skills for children at risk of learning difficulties, considering not only their initial level but also their learning potential and behavioural profiles.
Dynamic Assessment for Literacy: Utility in Children With Difficulties of Different Socioeconomic Status
Although children who grow up in a low socioeconomic situation present deficits in literacy skills, the present research aimed to shed light on the skills they possess and how detecting them can help improve their development. A total of 439 children were analysed for their literacy skills, learning potential in reading‐ and writing‐related skills as determined by dynamic assessment methodology, and behaviour during the test situation. Participants belonged to three groups: children with socioeconomic disadvantage, children with literacy difficulties and children with typical development. Results showed that children with socioeconomic disadvantage and those with literacy difficulties showed similar results in traditional reading and writing tests. Nonetheless, children with socioeconomic disadvantage showed higher learning potential in these skills than children with literacy difficulties. This result supports the accuracy of dynamic assessment for classification. In addition, the behavioural profile in a test situation differed between the groups. The study conclusions relate to the importance of developing intervention programmes in reading and writing skills for children at risk of learning difficulties, considering not only their initial level but also their learning potential and behavioural profiles.