Asem Al-Salemi
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Asem Al-Salemi has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Fadl Alfarawan
Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
1 shared publication - Maximilian Bockhorn
Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
1 shared publication - Nader El-Sourani
Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, University of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 12 March 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Hernia
- Vol. 29 (1) , 1-10
Early postoperative outcomes in a retrospective propensity score-matched comparison of robotic extended totally extraperitoneal (r-eTEP) and extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) repair for ventral hernia
Background: The extended totally extraperitoneal technique (eTEP) is a novel approach for ventral hernia repair. This technique has been recently advanced using robotics (r-eTEP). The aim of this study is to perform a comprehensive analysis of the initial results of r-eTEP and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique compared to the eTEP technique. Methods: This is a monocentric retrospective study of patients with ventral hernias who underwent surgery via eTEP or r-eTEP in our department between 2019 and 2023. Propensity score matching was applied to compare the groups. Preoperative patient and hernia characteristics, intraoperative findings, and postoperative outcomes were subsequently analysed. Results: Patient demographics were comparable between the groups. The r-eTEP group had a significantly greater proportion of M3 hernias ( p = 0.006), M4 hernias ( p = 0.020), incisional hernias ( p = 0.002), and hernias with rectus diastasis ( p < 0.001). The r-eTEP group had a significantly larger hernia defect ( p = 0.003) and larger mesh size ( p = 0.015). The r-eTEP group had a shorter hospital stay ( p < 0.001) and shorter operative time, though not statistically significant ( p = 0.211). Intraoperative and postoperative complications, as well as postoperative pain, were comparable between the groups. Conclusion: The findings of the present study show that the r-eTEP technique may offer potential benefits as the overall hospital stay was shorter while intraoperative and postoperative complications were comparable for both techniques.
- 12 March 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Hernia
- Vol. 29 (1) , 1-10
Open AccessEarly postoperative outcomes in a retrospective propensity score-matched comparison of robotic extended totally extraperitoneal (r-eTEP) and extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) repair for ventral hernia
Background: The extended totally extraperitoneal technique (eTEP) is a novel approach for ventral hernia repair. This technique has been recently advanced using robotics (r-eTEP). The aim of this study is to perform a comprehensive analysis of the initial results of r-eTEP and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique compared to the eTEP technique. Methods: This is a monocentric retrospective study of patients with ventral hernias who underwent surgery via eTEP or r-eTEP in our department between 2019 and 2023. Propensity score matching was applied to compare the groups. Preoperative patient and hernia characteristics, intraoperative findings, and postoperative outcomes were subsequently analysed. Results: Patient demographics were comparable between the groups. The r-eTEP group had a significantly greater proportion of M3 hernias ( p = 0.006), M4 hernias ( p = 0.020), incisional hernias ( p = 0.002), and hernias with rectus diastasis ( p < 0.001). The r-eTEP group had a significantly larger hernia defect ( p = 0.003) and larger mesh size ( p = 0.015). The r-eTEP group had a shorter hospital stay ( p < 0.001) and shorter operative time, though not statistically significant ( p = 0.211). Intraoperative and postoperative complications, as well as postoperative pain, were comparable between the groups. Conclusion: The findings of the present study show that the r-eTEP technique may offer potential benefits as the overall hospital stay was shorter while intraoperative and postoperative complications were comparable for both techniques.